[Indexed as: Thomson v. Thomson]

AMANDA LOUISE THOMSON v. PAUL THOMSON

Supreme Court of Canada Lamer C.J.C., La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. Judgment - January 26, 1994.

Counsel: Martin G. Tadman, for appellant. Jack A. King and Holly D. Penner, for respondent. Graham Garton, Q.C., and Louise Lussier, for intervenor Attorney General of Canada. Joan A. MacPhail, for intervenor Attorney General of Manitoba. Robert H. Ratcliffe and Elizabeth Bucci, for intervenor Attorney General of Ontario.

(Doc. 23794)

January 26, 1994. The judgment of the court was delivered by

LAMER C.J.C. (orally):- The appeal is dismissed on the undertaking made to the Court by respondent through his counsel. Counsel will deposit with the Registrar no later than tomorrow at noon a signed undertaking in the terms before the Court. Madame Justice L'Heureux-Dubé would have agreed with Madame Justice Helper's disposition of the case in reference to the undertaking.

Reasons and determination as to costs to follow.

Appeal dismissed.