Sparling v. Royal Trustco Ltd., 1986 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1986] 2 SCR 537
Royal Trustco Limited, Kenneth Alan White, John Dykes Allan, the Honourable Reginald James Balfour, Robert Gilmour Bentall, George Drummond Birks, Donald Newton Byers, James McIntyre Cameron, Alistair Matheson Campbell, Keith Campbell, Charles Joseph Clark, Henry Collingwood, Fraser Matthews Fell, Eric Lyon Hamilton, Conrad Fetherstonaugh Harrington, Frederick William Pryce Jones, Egerton Warren King, Angus Athole MacNaughton, John Frederick McDougall, the Honourable Maurice Riel, John Merton Scholes, David George Waldon, Allan Walters and Marshall Mackenzie Williams Appellants
v.
Frederick Herbert Sparling, Director appointed under section 253 of the Canada Business Corporations Act Respondent
indexed as: sparling v. royal trustco ltd.
File No.: 18597.
1986: November 3; 1986: November 6.
Present: Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Wilson and La Forest JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario
Corporations ‑‑ Take‑over bids ‑‑ Directors’ circular of offeree corporation failing to meet statutory disclosure requirements ‑‑ Director appointed by Minister under s. 253 of the Canada Business Corporations Act entitled to bring action for compensation on behalf of the aggrieved shareholders ‑‑ Director’s action may be brought against both the offeree corporation and its directors.
Held: The appeal should be dismissed for the reasons given in the Ontario Court of Appeal.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1984), 1984 CanLII 2040 (ON CA), 6 D.L.R. (4th) 682, 24 B.L.R. 145, 45 O.R. (2d) 484, 1 O.A.C. 279, allowing respondent's appeal from a judgment of Trainor J. (1983), 1983 CanLII 3051 (ON SC), 143 D.L.R. (3d) 112, 21 B.L.R. 97, 32 C.P.C. 291, striking out certain portions of respondent's statement of claim. Appeal dismissed.
W. A. Kelly, Q.C., and R. D. Collins, for the appellant Royal Trustco Ltd.
J. J. Robinette, Q.C., and H. C. G. Underwood, for the other appellants.
E. R. Murray, Q.C., and N. Gillespie, for the respondent.
The following is the judgment delivered by
- The Court‑‑Assisted by the concise and comprehensive submissions by all counsel, the Court has concluded that all the issues raised in this appeal were fully and correctly dealt with by the Court of Appeal, speaking through Cory J.A. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with costs.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Solicitors for the appellant Royal Trustco Ltd.: Fasken & Calvin, Toronto.
Solicitors for the other appellants: McCarthy & McCarthy, Toronto.
Solicitors for the respondent: Cassels, Brock & Blackwell, Toronto.
