The plaintiff sued the defendant municipality after slipping and falling on ice.
The initial notices of claim provided to the municipality inaccurately described the location of the fall.
The defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing the claim was statute-barred due to the deficient notice.
The court found that while the issue of prejudice to the municipality was a genuine issue for trial, the plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse for the deficient notice, as he did not provide evidence from family members who were present at the time of the fall.
The motion for summary judgment was granted and the action was dismissed.
