The accused was convicted of sexual assault.
At trial, he challenged the constitutionality of the 'rape shield' provisions in s. 276 of the Criminal Code, which restrict the admissibility of evidence of a complainant's prior sexual activity.
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the constitutionality of the provisions, finding that they do not violate the accused's right to make full answer and defence, the right to a fair trial, or the right against self-incrimination.
The Court held that the provisions properly balance the accused's rights with the need to protect the integrity of the trial process and the privacy of complainants.
