The applicant brought a motion to change child support retroactively, alleging the respondent misrepresented his income and falsified financial documents.
The court found the respondent lacked credibility due to a pattern of concealing income and falsifying records.
While most of the respondent's claimed business expenses (mileage allowances, car payments, insurance, cell, internet, gas heating, bookkeeping) were rejected, the court allowed a deduction of one-third of claimed gas and repair expenses.
The respondent's 2014 gross income was also adjusted upwards based on new evidence.
