The applicants sought a declaration that their default judgment against the respondent survived his bankruptcy discharge under s. 178(1)(d) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.
The judgment arose after the respondent's real estate lawyer mistakenly paid him sale proceeds that were supposed to be held in trust to discharge a mortgage.
The respondent misappropriated the funds, spent them on personal items, and later declared bankruptcy without listing the applicants as creditors.
The court granted the application, finding that the respondent acted in a fiduciary capacity regarding the mistakenly received trust funds and that his misappropriation meant the debt survived his bankruptcy.