Following separation and divorce proceedings, the court adjudicated unresolved issues concerning equalization-related debt, reimbursement of post‑separation house expenses, damage to matrimonial property, and entitlement to spousal support.
The applicant alleged a loan from her father that should be recognized as a debt on the valuation date, sought reimbursement of mortgage and tax payments made after separation, and claimed long‑term spousal support based on alleged disability.
The court accepted evidence that a bona fide loan of $77,902 existed at separation but rejected the claim for reimbursement of house expenses.
It found the respondent responsible for damage to a kitchen countertop occurring after separation.
The court determined the medical evidence did not establish ongoing disability and ordered time‑limited spousal support only to facilitate transition to self‑sufficiency.
