The plaintiff was struck by a vehicle and claimed complex injuries including a traumatic brain injury.
The plaintiff served three expert reports and agreed to attend three corresponding defence medical examinations.
The defendant brought a motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to attend a fourth examination with a neurologist.
The court granted the motion, finding that the plaintiff had been treated by multiple neurologists who might be called as participant experts at trial to offer opinions on causation.
To ensure trial fairness and level the playing field, the defendant was entitled to a responding neurological examination.