The parties separated after a 12-year common law relationship.
The mother sought an equitable interest in the father's home and pension based on unjust enrichment, as well as child and spousal support.
The father sought to impute income to the mother, arguing she was intentionally under-employed.
The court dismissed the unjust enrichment claim, finding no economic integration and that the father had solely funded the property and household expenses.
The court found the mother was intentionally under-employed and imputed an income of $50,000 to her.
The father was ordered to pay set-off child support and indefinite compensatory and non-compensatory spousal support.
