The applicant sought an order quashing a preliminary hearing judge's decision to commit her for trial on five charges, including firearm possession, unlawful transfer, theft of chattels, unlawful entry into a dwelling, and possession of a firearm obtained by crime.
The court reviewed the committal for jurisdictional error, specifically the absence of evidence on essential elements.
The court found sufficient evidence for committal on the firearm charges (Counts 1, 2, 5) and theft (Count 3, limited to money and the firearm).
However, the committal for unlawful entry (Count 4) was quashed because the applicant, as a joint owner of the matrimonial home without an exclusive possession order, had a lawful right to be there.