The accused, an educational aide, was charged with sexual assault and sexual touching of a 12-year-old student.
The Crown's case relied entirely on the testimony of the complainant.
The court found the complainant's testimony to be unreliable and contrived, noting significant inconsistencies regarding the location, timing, and circumstances of the alleged offences, as well as the complainant's history of behavioural challenges and deceitfulness.
The court accepted the accused's denial of wrongdoing as credible and acquitted her of all charges.
