The mother brought an urgent motion to permit the parties' six-year-old child to attend a specialized speech and language program at a different school for grade one.
The father opposed the motion, arguing the child's primary issue was hearing, not speech, and that changing schools would be disruptive.
The court found the mother's proposal was logical, child-focused, and supported by professional recommendations.
The court granted the motion, noting that the father's opposition reflected an unfortunate competitiveness that undermined the spirit of their shared parenting arrangement.
