The accused was charged with sexual assault and sexual interference against a 12-year-old neighbour in their apartment building hallway.
The court applied the W.(D.) framework to assess credibility, rejecting the accused's testimony as not credible due to implausible memory gaps.
The court accepted the complainant's clear and reliable evidence, which was corroborated by surveillance video.
The accused was found guilty on both counts, with the sexual assault conviction stayed under the Kienapple principle.
