The defendants sought leave to appeal an interlocutory order that granted the plaintiff standing to participate in the action.
The motion judge had found the plaintiff had a direct interest, public interest standing, and could be added via a representative order.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for leave to appeal, finding no reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's decision and that neither branch of the test for leave to appeal under Rule 62.02(4) was met.
