The applicant condominium corporation sought an order to compel the respondent unit owner to allow the removal and replacement of unauthorized garage and front doors, which were modifications to common elements.
The respondent claimed verbal approval for the modifications and cross-claimed for oppression under section 135 of the Condominium Act.
The court found that the respondent had not obtained proper written approval for the modifications and dismissed the oppression claim, distinguishing the facts from a prior case where oppression was found.
The application was granted, ordering the respondent to provide access for the corporation to replace the doors, with the corporation bearing the cost of the new doors.
