2100 Stagecoach Inc., 2026 CanLII 4295

DECISION CONSENT/SEVERANCE

Date of Decision: January 23, 2026
Panel: 3 - Rural
File: D08-01-25/B-00281
Application: Consent under section 53 of the Planning Act
Applicant: 2100 Stagecoach Inc.
Property Address: 2100 Stagecoach Road
Ward: 20 - Osgoode
Legal Description: Part of Lot 14, Concession 3, Geographic Township of Osgoode
Zoning: RU
Zoning By-law: 2008-250
Heard: January 13, 2026, in person and by videoconference

APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL AND PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATION

1The Applicant wants to subdivide the property into two separate parcels of land to create one new lot for future residential development.

2The Applicant seeks the Committee’s consent to sever land. The property is shown on a sketch and draft 4Rplan. The separate parcels will be as follows:

3The land to be severed, shown as part 1 on the draft 4Rplan, will have a frontage of 111.2 metres, an irregular depth, and a lot area of 3.38 hectares. This parcel is vacant and will be known as 2129 Manotick Station Road.

4The retained land, shown on the sketch, will have a frontage of 199.3 metres, in irregular depth, and a lot area of 38.09 hectares. This parcel is vacant and will be known as 2100 Stagecoach Road.

5The property is not the subject of any other current application under the Planning Act.

PUBLIC HEARING

Oral Submissions Summary

6Alison Clarke, agent for the Applicant, provided a slide presentation, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary-Treasurer and available from the Committee Coordinator upon request.

7Ms. Clarke requested clarification concerning the discrepancy between the setback requirements from City Planning and South Nation Conservation Authority. City Planner Wendy Yang clarified that the 30-metre setback requirement applies to watercourses, while James Holland of the South Nation Conservation Authority explained that the 15-metre setback requirement represents the 100-year floodplain area. Ms. Clarke confirmed she was in agreement with amending the condition requested by City Planning to provide a development envelope to also include approval from the South Nation Conservation Authority.

8Ms. Clarke clarified the zoning of the parcels permits residential development and that no development was proposed on the retained land at this time.

9The Committee also heard oral submissions from the following individuals:

Mrs. C. Vriend, resident, requested additional information on the intended use and zoning of the subject property.
Mr. C. Vriend, resident, raised concerns regarding alterations to the subject property.

DECISION AND REASONS OF THE COMMITTEE: APPLICATION GRANTED

Application Must Satisfy Statutory Tests

10Under the Planning Act, the Committee has the power to grant a consent if it is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality. Also, the Committee must be satisfied that an application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, and has regard for matters of provincial interest under section 2 of the Act, as well as the following criteria set out in subsection 51(24):

Criteria

(24) In considering a draft plan of subdivision, regard shall be had, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience, accessibility for persons with disabilities and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality and to,

a) the effect of development of the proposed subdivision on matters of provincial interest as referred to in section 2;

b) whether the proposed subdivision is premature or in the public interest;

c) whether the plan conforms to the official plan and adjacent plans of subdivision, if any;

d) the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided;

d.1) if any affordable housing units are being proposed, the suitability of the proposed units for affordable housing;

e) the number, width, location and proposed grades and elevations of highways, and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and the adequacy of them;

f) the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots;

g) the restrictions or proposed restrictions, if any, on the land proposed to be subdivided or the buildings and structures proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on adjoining land;

h) conservation of natural resources and flood control;

i) the adequacy of utilities and municipal services;

j) the adequacy of school sites;

k) the area of land, if any, within the proposed subdivision that, exclusive of highways, is to be conveyed or dedicated for public purposes;

l) the extent to which the plan’s design optimizes the available supply, means of supplying, efficient use and conservation of energy; and

m) the interrelationship between the design of the proposed plan of subdivision and site plan control matters relating to any development on the land, if the land is also located within a site plan control area designated under subsection 41 (2) of this Act or subsection 114 (2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. 1994, c. 23, s. 30; 2001, c. 32, s. 31 (2); 2006, c. 23, s. 22 (3, 4); 2016, c. 25, Sched. 4, s. 8 (2).

Evidence

11Evidence considered by the Committee included all oral submissions made at the hearing, as highlighted above, and the following written submissions held on file with the Secretary-Treasurer and available from the Committee Coordinator upon request:

Application and supporting documents, including planning rationale, plans, parcel abstract, correspondence with the City’s Forestry Department, photo of the posted sign, and a sign posting declaration.
City Planning Report received January 8, 2026, with no concerns.
South Nation Conservation Authority email dated January 9, 2026, with no objections.
South Nation Conservation Authority Septic Office email dated January 9, 2026, with no objections.
Hydro Ottawa email dated January 8, 2026, with no comments.

Effect of Submissions on Decision

12The Committee considered all written and oral submissions relating to the application in making its decision and granted the application.

13The Committee notes that the City’s Planning Report raises “no concerns” regarding the application subject to the requested conditions, as amended and agreed to by the Applicant’s agent.

14Regarding the concerns raised by residents about the future use of the subject property and the current alterations to the site, the Committee notes that this application relates only to the subdivision of land for future residential development, and that the concerns raised about current and past activity on the site are outside the Committee’s purview.

15Based on the evidence, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, that promotes building homes, sustaining strong communities; providing infrastructure and public service facilities in an efficient manner while accommodating projected needs; the wise use and management of resources; and, protecting public health and safety.

16The Committee is also satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard to matters of provincial interest, including the orderly development of safe and healthy communities; the appropriate location of growth and development; and the protection of public health and safety.

17Additionally, the Committee is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality.

18Moreover, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard for the criteria specified under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act and is in the public interest.

19THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ORDERS that the application is granted and the provisional consent is to be given, subject to the conditions set out in Appendix A to this decision.

"Terence Otto"
TERENCE OTTO
VICE-CHAIR

Absent
GARY DUNCAN
MEMBER

Absent
BETH HENDERSON
MEMBER

"Martin Vervoort"
MARTIN VERVOORT
MEMBER

"Jocelyn Chandler"
JOCELYN CHANDLER
MEMBER

"Heather MacLean"
HEATHER MACLEAN
MEMBER

"George Barrett"
GEORGE BARRETT
MEMBER

I certify this is a true copy of the Decision of the Committee of Adjustment of the City of Ottawa, dated January 23, 2026

“Michel Bellemare”
MICHEL BELLEMARE
SECRETARY-TREASURER

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

To appeal this decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), a completed appeal form and the filing fee must be submitted via one of the below options and must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on February 12, 2026.

OLT E-FILE SERVICE – An appeal can be filed online through the E-File Portal . First-time users will need to register for a My Ontario Account. Select [Ottawa (City): Committee of Adjustment] as the Approval Authority. To complete the appeal, fill in all the required fields and provide the filing fee by credit card.
BY EMAIL - Appeal packages can be submitted by email to cofa@ottawa.ca. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Land Tribunal. Please indicate on the appeal form that payment will be made by credit card.
IN PERSON – Appeal packages can be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, 101 Centrepointe Drive, 4th floor, Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 5K7. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Land Tribunal. In person payment can be made by certified cheque or money order made payable to the Ontario Minister of Finance, or by credit card. Please indicate on the appeal form if you wish to pay by credit card.

Please note only one of the above options needs to be completed. If your preferred method of appeal is not available at the time of filing, the appeal must be filed with one of the other two options.

The Ontario Land Tribunal has established a filing fee of $400.00 per type of application with an additional filing fee of $25.00 for each secondary application.

Only the applicant, the Minister or a specified person or public body that has an interest in the matter may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. A “specified person” does not include an individual or a community association.

There are no provisions for the Committee of Adjustment or the Ontario Land Tribunal to extend the statutory deadline to file an appeal. If the deadline is not met, the OLT does not have the authority to hold a hearing to consider your appeal.

If you have any questions about the appeal process, please visit File an Appeal | Ontario Land Tribunal

NOTICE TO APPLICANT(S)

Should a Development Agreement be required, such request should be initiated 30 working days prior to lapsing date of the consent and should include all required documentation including that related to transfers, easements, and postponements, and all approved technical studies. If you do not fulfill the conditions of provisional consent within the two-year period, the Planning Act provides that your application “shall be deemed to be refused”.

Ce document est également offert en français.

Committee of Adjustment
City of Ottawa
Ottawa.ca/CommitteeofAdjustment
cofa@ottawa.ca
613-580-2436

Comité de dérogation
Ville d’Ottawa
Ottawa.ca/Comitedederogation
cded@ottawa.ca
613-580-2436

APPENDIX A

That the Owner(s) prepares and submits demonstration of a minimum 0.2-hectare development envelope that is a minimum of 30 metres away from the watercourses and Municipal Drains and outside Natural Heritage System corridor and natural hazards to the satisfaction of the Manager of the Development Review All Wards Branch, or their designate and South Nation Conservation Authority. If accepted, the Owner shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner(s) and to the satisfaction of the Manager of the Development Review All Wards Branch, or their designate to be registered on title, which includes a description of the accepted development envelope, and mitigation measures identified in “2165 Manotick Station Road Scoped Environmental Impact Statement” provided by Parsons and dated November, 2022.
That the Owner(s) provide a Hydrogeological and Terrain Analysis report, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate. The report shall be prepared by a licensed Professional Geoscientist (P.Geo.) or Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) and be in accordance with the City of Ottawa's council-approved Hydrogeological and Terrain Analysis Guidelines (March, 2021), as amended. The reporting must provide sufficient information with the application to demonstrate:

a. That sufficient quantity of groundwater exists on the site to service the development,

b. That the quality of the groundwater meets or exceeds the drinking water standards and guidelines referenced in the City's council-approved Hydrogeological and Terrain Analysis Guidelines (March, 2021), as amended, and

c. That the operation of sewage systems on the lots will not adversely impact on wells to be constructed or on the wells of neighboring properties.

Where groundwater water quantity or quality are considered marginal, as many as one test well per lot may be required to demonstrate the adequacy of the aquifer to support the proposed development. Technical Pre-Consultation with the City's Hydrogeological staff is highly recommended for sites where quantity or quality are marginal, where dug wells are contemplated, or where the site is likely to be hydrogeologically sensitive.

If the accepted report recommends specific mitigation measures or design requirements, the Owner(s) shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner(s), to include those recommendations and such agreement shall be registered on title. In instances where the subject site is hydrogeologically sensitive, the drilling of a well and/or the conveyance of a 30-centimetre reserve may be required to ensure that the measures are implemented in accordance with the recommendations of the approved hydrogeological reporting. Both the report and any required Development Agreement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate.

That the Owner(s) enter into an Agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner(s), which is to be registered on title to deal with the following covenant/notice that shall run with the land and bind future owners on subsequent transfers:

“The City of Ottawa does not guarantee the quality or quantity of the groundwater. If, at some future date, the quality or the quantity of the groundwater becomes deficient, the City of Ottawa bears no responsibility, financial or otherwise, to provide solutions to the deficiency, such solutions being the sole responsibility of the homeowner.”

The Committee shall be provided a copy of the Agreement and written confirmation from City Legal Services that it has been registered on title.

That the Owner(s) enter into an Agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner(s), which is to be registered on title to deal with the following covenant/notice that shall run with the land and bind future owners on subsequent transfers:

“The property is located next to lands that have an existing source of environmental noise (collector road) and may therefore be subject to noise and other activities associated with that use.”