Committee of Adjustment
Comité de dérogation
DECISION CONSENT/SEVERANCE
Panel: 2 - Suburban
Files: D08-01-26/B-00057, D08-01-26/B-00058
Application: Consent under section 53 of the Planning Act
Applicant: Talen Homes Inc.
Property Address: 2052 Boyer Road
Ward: 2 - Orléans West-Innes
Legal Description: Part of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 2 (Ottawa Front), former Township of Gloucester
Zoning By-law: 2008-250 / 2026-50
Zoning: R2N / N2B
Heard: April 21, 2026, in person and by videoconference
APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL AND PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATIONS
1The Applicant wants to subdivide the property into two separate parcels of land for the construction of two long semi-detached dwellings with two additional dwelling units to each principal dwelling unit, for a total of 12 units. The existing dwelling will be demolished.
CONSENT REQUIRED
2The Applicant seeks the Committee’s consent to sever land and for grants of easements/rights of way. The property is shown as Parts 1 to 4 on a draft reference plan filed with the applications and the separate parcels will be as follows:
Table 1 Proposed Parcels
| File No. | Frontage | Depth | Area | Part No. | Building |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-00057 | 15.24 m | 43.76 m | 683.4 sq. m | 1 and 2 | Proposed long semi-detached dwelling with additional units |
| B-00058 | 15.24 m | 44.50 m | 679.4 sq. m | 3 and 4 | Proposed long semi-detached dwelling with additional units |
3The applications indicate the property is subject to an existing easement as in LT499253.
[4] It is proposed to establish easements/rights of way as follows:
- Over Part 2 in favour of Parts 3 and 4 for access.
- Over Part 3 in favour of Parts 1 and 2 for access.
5The property is not the subject of any other current application under the Planning Act.
6For the purposes of the transition and continuation provisions of Zoning By-law 2026-50, the applications were deemed complete on March 30, 2026.
PUBLIC HEARING
Oral Submissions Summary
7Peter Hume, agent for the Applicant, provided a slide presentation, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary-Treasurer and available from the Committee Coordinator upon request.
8Mr. Hume confirmed that the proposal is compliant with all zoning provisions.
[9] The Committee also heard oral submissions from the following individuals:
- J. Provost and D. Lynn, residents, highlighted concerns about the impact of the proposal on their property and on the neighbourhood. They also expressed concerns regarding stormwater and drainage issues, snow management, waste management, and the removal of trees.
- T. Kriznik, resident, presented a slideshow. She referred to photos highlighting concerns about the damage to infrastructure due to construction in the area, specifically on the public right of way, and its impact on the neighborhood.
- C. Smith, resident, raised concerns regarding intensification on Boyer Road and the impacts on the character of the neighborhood, the removal of mature trees and natural habitats, and the safety of pedestrians.
10City Planner Nick Burnie confirmed that he had no concerns with the application.
11Following the public hearing, the Committee reserved its decision.
DECISION AND REASONS OF THE COMMITTEE: APPLICATIONS GRANTED
Application Must Satisfy Statutory Tests
12Under the Planning Act, the Committee has the power to grant a consent if it is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality. Also, the Committee must be satisfied that an application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, and has regard for matters of provincial interest under section 2 of the Act, as well as the following criteria set out in subsection 51(24):
Criteria
(24) In considering a draft plan of subdivision, regard shall be had, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience, accessibility for persons with disabilities and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality and to,
a) the effect of development of the proposed subdivision on matters of provincial interest as referred to in section 2;
b) whether the proposed subdivision is premature or in the public interest;
c) whether the plan conforms to the official plan and adjacent plans of subdivision, if any;
d) the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided;
d.1) if any affordable housing units are being proposed, the suitability of the proposed units for affordable housing;
e) the number, width, location and proposed grades and elevations of highways, and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and the adequacy of them;
f) the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots;
g) the restrictions or proposed restrictions, if any, on the land proposed to be subdivided or the buildings and structures proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on adjoining land;
h) conservation of natural resources and flood control;
i) the adequacy of utilities and municipal services;
j) the adequacy of school sites;
k) the area of land, if any, within the proposed subdivision that, exclusive of highways, is to be conveyed or dedicated for public purposes;
l) the extent to which the plan’s design optimizes the available supply, means of supplying, efficient use and conservation of energy; and
m) the interrelationship between the design of the proposed plan of subdivision and site plan control matters relating to any development on the land, if the land is also located within a site plan control area designated under subsection 41 (2) of this Act or subsection 114 (2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. 1994, c. 23, s. 30; 2001, c. 32, s. 31 (2); 2006, c. 23, s. 22 (3, 4); 2016, c. 25, Sched. 4, s. 8 (2).
Evidence
13Evidence considered by the Committee included all oral submissions made at the hearing, as highlighted above, and the following written submissions held on file with the Secretary-Treasurer and available from the Committee Coordinator upon request:
- Applications and supporting documents, including cover letter, plans, tree information report, parcel abstract, photo of the posted sign, and a sign posting declaration.
- City Planning Report received April 16, 2026, with no concerns.
- Rideau Valley Conservation Authority email received April 13, 2026, with no objections.
- Hydro Ottawa email received April 13, 2026, with comments.
- T. Kriznik and R. Lucas, residents, email received April 13, 2026, with comments.
- J. Provost, resident, email received April 13, 2026, with comments.
- C. Smith, resident, email received April 20, 2026, opposed.
- D. Smith, resident, email received April 20, 2026, opposed.
Effect of Submissions on Decision
14The Committee considered all written and oral submissions relating to the applications in making its decision and granted the applications.
15The Committee notes that the City’s Planning Report raises “no concerns” regarding the applications, subject to the requested conditions agreed to by the Applicant’s agent.
16Based on the evidence, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, that promotes building homes, sustaining strong communities; providing infrastructure and public service facilities in an efficient manner while accommodating projected needs; the wise use and management of resources; and, protecting public health and safety.
17The Committee is also satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard to matters of provincial interest, including the orderly development of safe and healthy communities; the appropriate location of growth and development; and the protection of public health and safety.
18Additionally, the Committee is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality.
19Moreover, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard for the criteria specified under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act and is in the public interest.
20THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ORDERS that the applications are granted and the provisional consent is to be given, subject to the conditions set out in Appendix A to this decision.
"Fabian Poulin" FABIAN POULIN VICE-CHAIR
"Jay Baltz" JAY BALTZ MEMBER
"George Barrett" GEORGE BARRETT MEMBER
"Heather MacLean" HEATHER MACLEAN MEMBER
Absent JULIANNE WRIGHT MEMBER
"Gary Duncan" GARY DUNCAN MEMBER
I certify this is a true copy of the decision of the Ottawa Committee of Adjustment, dated May 1, 2026. “Michel Bellemare” MICHEL BELLEMARE SECRETARY-TREASURER
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
To appeal this decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), a completed appeal form and the filing fee must be submitted via one of the below options and must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on May 21, 2026.
OLT E-FILE SERVICE – An appeal can be filed online through the E-File Portal . First-time users will need to register for a My Ontario Account. Select [Ottawa (City): Committee of Adjustment] as the Approval Authority. To complete the appeal, fill in all the required fields and provide the filing fee by credit card.
BY EMAIL - Appeal packages can be submitted by email to cofa@ottawa.ca. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Land Tribunal. Please indicate on the appeal form that payment will be made by credit card.
IN PERSON – Appeal packages can be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, 101 Centrepointe Drive, 4th floor, Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 5K7. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Land Tribunal. In person payment can be made by certified cheque or money order made payable to the Ontario Minister of Finance, or by credit card. Please indicate on the appeal form if you wish to pay by credit card.
Please note only one of the above options needs to be completed. If your preferred method of appeal is not available at the time of filing, the appeal must be filed with one of the other two options.
The Ontario Land Tribunal has established a filing fee of $400.00 per type of application with an additional filing fee of $25.00 for each secondary application.
Only the applicant, the Minister or a specified person or public body that has an interest in the matter may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. A “specified person” does not include an individual or a community association.
There are no provisions for the Committee of Adjustment or the Ontario Land Tribunal to extend the statutory deadline to file an appeal. If the deadline is not met, the OLT does not have the authority to hold a hearing to consider your appeal.
If you have any questions about the appeal process, please visit File an Appeal | Ontario Land Tribunal
NOTICE TO APPLICANT(S)
Should a Development Agreement be required, such request should be initiated 30 working days prior to lapsing date of the consent and should include all required documentation including that related to transfers, easements, and postponements, and all approved technical studies. If you do not fulfill the conditions of provisional consent within the two-year period, the Planning Act provides that your application “shall be deemed to be refused”.
Ce document est également offert en français.
Committee of Adjustment City of Ottawa Ottawa.ca/CommitteeofAdjustment cofa@ottawa.ca 613-580-2436
Comité de dérogation Ville d’Ottawa Ottawa.ca/Comitedederogation cded@ottawa.ca 613-580-2436
APPENDIX A
That the Owner(s) provide evidence to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official, or designate, that the house and rear sheds have been demolished or relocated under the authority of a building permit.
That the Owner(s) provide evidence, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards, Planning, Development and Building Services Department, that each existing parcel has its own independent storm, sanitary and water services connected to City infrastructure and that these services do not cross the proposed severance line. If they do cross or are not independent, the Owner(s) will be required, at their own cost, to relocate the existing services or construct new services from the City sewers/watermain. Further, the Owner(s) shall comply with 7.1.5.4(1) of the Ontario Building Code, O. Reg. 163/24 as amended. If necessary, a plumbing permit shall be obtained from Building Code Services for any required alterations. Notice shall be provided in writing to the Committee from the Department confirming this condition has been fulfilled
a) That the owner(s) submit a QuickSWM Analysis to determine if On-Site Stormwater Management (“SWM”) Measures are required including what storage volume is required to maintain or improve the existing level of service; or alternatively,
b) The owner(s) shall submit a SWM Report/Brief, prepared by a professional civil engineer, licensed in the province of Ontario, based on the current City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines to determine On-Site SWM Measures and what storage volume is to maintain or improve the existing level of service.
c) If required through a) The owner shall submit a detailed engineering design based on the results of the QuickSWM Analysis prepared pursuant to paragraph (a), or the recommendations of the SWM Brief prepared pursuant to paragraph (b), prepared by a professional civil engineer, licensed in the province of Ontario. The detailed engineering design shall include all required grading, servicing and stormwater management construction design details. Where the QuickSWM Analysis or SWM Brief demonstrates on-site stormwater management measures are not required, the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, shall deem this condition satisfied.
d) If all or a portion of the On-Site SWM Measures include infiltration techniques, then the owner(s) shall submit a Geotechnical Brief, prepared by a geotechnical professional, licensed in the province of Ontario, or a professional geoscientist, licensed in the province of Ontario.
e) If On-Site SWM Measures are required, then the owner(s) may be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City to implement any On-Site SWM Measures including construction of any proposed On-Site SWM works. The Development Agreement may include a requirement to post the securities for certain On-Site SWM works. The Development Agreement will require compliance with the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, Consolidated Linear Infrastructure, Environmental Compliance Approval (CLI-ECA) for any sewers constructed on municipally owned property, as well as any other permits or approvals required by other governments or regulatory agencies. The Committee shall be provided a copy of the Agreement and written confirmation from City Legal Services that it has been registered on title.
f) If On-Site SWM works cross and/or benefit more than one property, then the owner(s) shall apply to the Committee of Adjustment to grant easement(s) for access and maintenance and/or register a Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement on title of the properties, all at the owner(s) costs.
g) All of the above (a) to (f) shall be to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate.
That the Owner(s) provide proof that a grading and drainage plan, prepared by a qualified Civil Engineer, licensed in the Province of Ontario, an Ontario Land Surveyor or a Certified Engineering Technologist, delineating the existing and proposed grades for both the severed and retained lands has been provided to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate.
The Owner(s) shall:
Prepare a Noise Control Study, in compliance with the City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate. The Owner(s) shall enter into an agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner(s), that requires the Owner(s) to implement any noise control attenuation measures recommended in the approved study. The Agreement shall also deal with any covenants/notices, recommended in the approved study, that shall run with the land and bind future owners on subsequent transfers, warning purchasers and/or tenants of expected noise levels due to the existing source of environmental noise (arterial, highway, airport, etc.). The Committee shall be provided a copy of the Agreement and written confirmation from City Legal Services that it has been registered on title.
or
Design the dwelling units with the provision for adding central air conditioning at the occupant’s discretion and enter into an Agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner, which is to be registered on title to deal with the covenants/ notices that shall run with the land and bind future owners on subsequent transfers, warning purchasers and/or tenants of expected noise levels due to the existing source of environmental noise. The Committee requires a copy of the Agreement and written confirmation from City Legal Services that it has been registered on title. The following two conditions will be included in the above-noted Agreement:
Notices-on-Title respecting noise:
i) “The Purchaser/Lessee for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns acknowledges being advised that this dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting, etc. was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning by the Purchaser/Lessee will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City of Ottawa’s and the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s noise criteria;” and
ii) “The Purchaser/Lessee for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns acknowledges being advised that noise levels due to increasing roadway traffic may be of concern, occasionally interfering with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the outdoor sound level exceeds the City of Ottawa’s and the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s noise criteria.”
That the Owner(s) enter into a Resurfacing Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the Program Manager, Right of Way Branch within the Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, and provide financial security in accordance with the Road Activity By-law, as amended, to install an asphalt overlay over the roadway surface of Insert ROW Name, fronting the subject lands, to the limits shown on the approved Site Servicing Plan. Where the approved Site Servicing Plan demonstrates the resurfacing is not required, based on the City’s Road Cut Resurfacing Policy, the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, shall deem this condition satisfied
That the Owner/Applicant(s) provide a revised Tree Information Report, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate. This report shall be prepared by an Arborist, identifying all trees protected under the City's Tree Protection by-law, and meeting the standards of the City's Tree Information Report Guidelines, including an assessment of impacts related to the current site plan, and specific mitigation measures where work is proposed within the Critical Root Zone of a protected tree.
That the Owner/Applicant(s) provide a tree planting plan, prepared to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, showing the location(s) and species or ultimate size of at least one new tree (50 mm caliper) per lot, in addition to any compensation trees required under the Tree Protection By-law.
That the Owner(s) submit a request for municipal addresses for each parcel, as required, to be assigned by the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official, or their designate. Confirmation of the assigned municipal addresses shall be provided in writing from Municipal Addressing, Building Code Services, to the Committee.
That the Owner(s) file with the Committee a copy of the registered Reference Plan prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor registered in the Province of Ontario, and signed by the Registrar, confirming the frontage and area of the severed land. If the Registered Plan does not indicate the lot area, a letter from the Surveyor confirming the area is required. The Registered Reference Plan must conform substantially to the Draft Reference Plan filed with the Application for Consent to the satisfaction of the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment or their designate.
That upon completion of the above conditions, and within the two-year period outlined above, the Owner(s) file with the Committee, the “electronic registration in preparation documents” for the conveyances and easements for which the consent is required to the satisfaction of the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment or their designate.