Committee of Adjustment
Comité de dérogation
DECISION CONSENT/SEVERANCE
May 1, 2026
Panel:
1 - Urban
File:
D08-01-26/B-00040
Application:
Consent under section 53 of the Planning Act
Applicant:
T. Cassone
Property Address:
318 Duncairn Avenue
Ward:
15 - Kitchissippi
Legal Description
Lot 3 and Part of Lot 2, Registered Plan 362
Zoning By-law:
2008-250
Zoning
R3R [2687] H(8.5)
Heard:
April 22, 2026, in person and by videoconference
APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL AND PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATION
1The Applicant wants to sever the property into two separate lots and build on one of them in the future. The existing house will remain however the detached garage will be demolished.
CONSENT REQUIRED
2The Applicant is requesting the Committee’s consent to sever land. The property is shown on a draft reference plan submitted along with the application, and the resulting separate lots would be as follows:
Table 1 Proposed Parcels
File No.
Frontage
Depth
Area
Part No.
Building
B-00040
6.1 m
36.14 m
220.5 sq. m
3
Future Residential Development
Retained
11.12 m
36.14 m
401.2 sq. m
4
Existing house
318 Duncairn Avenue
3There are no other pending applications regarding the property under the Planning Act.
4For the purposes of the transition and continuation provisions of Zoning By-law 2026-50, this application was deemed complete on March 2, 2026.
PUBLIC HEARING
5At the hearing scheduled for April 7, 2026, the Committee postponed consideration of the application to give the Applicant time to repost the notification sign on the property in accordance with the statutory requirements.
Oral Submissions Summary
6Simran Soor, the Applicant’s agent, provided an overview of the application and answered the Panel’s questions.
7The Committee also heard oral submissions from the following individuals:
T. Gray, Westboro Community Association, raised concerns about the lot sizes and the lack of parking on the retained property.
H. Akanko, a local resident, had no concerns with the application.
8City Planner Dylan Geldart confirmed that the municipality has no concerns with the application.
DECISION AND REASONS OF THE COMMITTEE: APPLICATION GRANTED
Application Must Satisfy Statutory Tests
9Under the Planning Act, the Committee has the power to grant a consent if it is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality. Also, the Committee must be satisfied that an application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, and has regard for matters of provincial interest under section 2 of the Act, as well as the following criteria set out in subsection 51(24):
Criteria
(24) In considering a draft plan of subdivision, regard shall be had, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience, accessibility for persons with disabilities and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality and to,
a) the effect of development of the proposed subdivision on matters of provincial interest as referred to in section 2;
b) whether the proposed subdivision is premature or in the public interest;
c) whether the plan conforms to the official plan and adjacent plans of subdivision, if any;
d) the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided;
d.1) if any affordable housing units are being proposed, the suitability of the proposed units for affordable housing;
e) the number, width, location and proposed grades and elevations of highways, and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and the adequacy of them;
f) the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots;
g) the restrictions or proposed restrictions, if any, on the land proposed to be subdivided or the buildings and structures proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on adjoining land;
h) conservation of natural resources and flood control;
i) the adequacy of utilities and municipal services;
j) the adequacy of school sites;
k) the area of land, if any, within the proposed subdivision that, exclusive of highways, is to be conveyed or dedicated for public purposes;
l) the extent to which the plan’s design optimizes the available supply, means of supplying, efficient use and conservation of energy; and
m) the interrelationship between the design of the proposed plan of subdivision and site plan control matters relating to any development on the land, if the land is also located within a site plan control area designated under subsection 41 (2) of this Act or subsection 114 (2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. 1994, c. 23, s. 30; 2001, c. 32, s. 31 (2); 2006, c. 23, s. 22 (3, 4); 2016, c. 25, Sched. 4, s. 8 (2).
Evidence
10The evidence reviewed by the Committee included any oral statements made during the hearing, as noted above, as well as the following written documents, which may be obtained upon request from the coordinator:
Application and supporting documents, including cover letter, plans, tree information, photo of the posted sign, and a sign posting declaration.
City Planning Report received April 15, 2026, and revised report received April 20, 2026, with no concerns.
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority email dated April 14, 2026, with no objections.
Hydro Ottawa email dated April 14, 2026, with comments.
Effect of Submissions on Decision
11The Committee considered all written and oral submissions relating to the application in making its decision and granted the application.
12The Committee notes that the City’s Planning Report raises “no concerns” regarding the application subject to the requested conditions agreed to by the Applicant’s agent.
13Based on the evidence, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, that promotes building homes, sustaining strong communities; providing infrastructure and public service facilities in an efficient manner while accommodating projected needs; the wise use and management of resources; and, protecting public health and safety.
14The Committee is also satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard to matters of provincial interest, including the orderly development of safe and healthy communities; the appropriate location of growth and development; and the protection of public health and safety.
15Additionally, the Committee is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality.
16Moreover, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard for the criteria specified under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act and is in the public interest.
17THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ORDERS that the application is granted and the provisional consent is to be given, subject to the conditions set out in Appendix A to this decision.
"John Blatherwick"
JOHN BLATHERWICK
ACTING PANEL CHAIR
"Arto Keklikian”
ARTO KEKLIKIAN
MEMBER
"Colin Haskin"
COLIN HASKIN
MEMBER
"Gary Duncan"
GARY DUNCAN
MEMBER
"Sharon Lécuyer"
SHARON LÉCUYER
MEMBER
I certify this is a true copy of the decision of the Ottawa Committee of Adjustment, dated May 1, 2026 “Michel Bellemare” MICHEL BELLEMARE SECRETARY-TREASURER
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
To appeal this decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), a completed appeal form and the filing fee must be submitted via one of the below options and must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on May 21, 2026.
OLT E-FILE SERVICE – An appeal can be filed online through the E-File Portal . First-time users will need to register for a My Ontario Account. Select [Ottawa (City): Committee of Adjustment] as the Approval Authority. To complete the appeal, fill in all the required fields and provide the filing fee by credit card.
BY EMAIL - Appeal packages can be submitted by email to cofa@ottawa.ca. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Land Tribunal. Please indicate on the appeal form that payment will be made by credit card.
IN PERSON – Appeal packages can be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, 101 Centrepointe Drive, 4th floor, Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 5K7. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Land Tribunal. In person payment can be made by certified cheque or money order made payable to the Ontario Minister of Finance, or by credit card. Please indicate on the appeal form if you wish to pay by credit card.
Please note only one of the above options needs to be completed. If your preferred method of appeal is not available at the time of filing, the appeal must be filed with one of the other two options.
The Ontario Land Tribunal has established a filing fee of $400.00 per type of application with an additional filing fee of $25.00 for each secondary application.
Only the applicant, the Minister or a specified person or public body that has an interest in the matter may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. A “specified person” does not include an individual or a community association.
There are no provisions for the Committee of Adjustment or the Ontario Land Tribunal to extend the statutory deadline to file an appeal. If the deadline is not met, the OLT does not have the authority to hold a hearing to consider your appeal.
If you have any questions about the appeal process, please visit File an Appeal | Ontario Land Tribunal
NOTICE TO APPLICANT(S)
Should a Development Agreement be required, such request should be initiated 30 working days prior to lapsing date of the consent and should include all required documentation including that related to transfers, easements, and postponements, and all approved technical studies. If you do not fulfill the conditions of provisional consent within the two-year period, the Planning Act provides that your application “shall be deemed to be refused”.
Ce document est également offert en français.
Committee of Adjustment
City of Ottawa
Ottawa.ca/CommitteeofAdjustment
613-580-2436
Comité de dérogation
Ville d’Ottawa
Ottawa.ca/Comitedederogation
613-580-2436
APPENDIX A
That the Owner(s) provide evidence, to the satisfaction of both the Chief Building Official and the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designates, that both severed and retained parcels have their own independent water, sanitary and storm connection as appropriate, that these services do not cross the proposed severance line and are connected directly to City infrastructure. Further, the Owner(s) shall comply to 7.1.5.4(1) of the Ontario Building Code, O. Reg. 332/12 as amended. If necessary, a plumbing permit shall be obtained from Building Code Services for any required alterations.
That the Owner(s) provide a Fire Flow Adequacy brief/memo, prepared by a Professional Engineer, licensed in the Province of Ontario, that assesses the fire flow demand including boundary conditions. The brief/memo shall be to the satisfaction of Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate.
That the owner(s) submit a QuickSWM Analysis to determine if On-Site Stormwater Management (“SWM”) Measures are required including what storage volume is required to maintain or improve the existing level of service; or alternatively,
a) The owner(s) shall submit a SWM Report/Brief, prepared by a professional civil engineer, licensed in the province of Ontario, based on the current City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines to determine On-Site SWM Measures and what storage volume is to maintain or improve the existing level of service
b) If required through a) The owner shall submit a detailed engineering design based on the results of the QuickSWM Analysis prepared pursuant to Condition 3, or the recommendations of the SWM Brief prepared pursuant to paragraph (a), prepared by a professional civil engineer, licensed in the province of Ontario. The detailed engineering design shall include all required grading, servicing and stormwater management construction design details. In lieu of preparation of on-site stormwater measures required, a development agreement may be required that obligates the measures prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where the QuickSWM Analysis or SWM Brief demonstrates on-site stormwater management measures are not required, the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, shall deem this condition satisfied.
c) If all or a portion of the On-Site SWM Measures include infiltration techniques, then the owner(s) shall submit a Geotechnical Brief, prepared by a geotechnical professional, licensed in the province of Ontario, or a professional geoscientist, licensed in the province of Ontario.
d) If On-Site SWM Measures are required, then the owner(s) may be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City to implement any On-Site SWM Measures including construction of any proposed On-Site SWM works. The Development Agreement may include a requirement to post the securities for certain On-Site SWM works. The Development Agreement will require compliance with the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, Consolidated Linear Infrastructure, Environmental Compliance Approval (CLI-ECA) for any sewers constructed on municipally owned property, as well as any other permits or approvals required by other governments or regulatory agencies. The Development Agreement will stipulate what will be required prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The Committee shall be provided a copy of the Agreement and written confirmation from City Legal Services that it has been registered on title.
e) If On-Site SWM works cross and/or benefit more than one property, then the owner(s) shall apply to the Committee of Adjustment to grant easement(s) for access and maintenance and/or register a Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement on title of the properties, all at the owner(s) costs.
f) All of the above (a) to (f) shall be to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate.
That the Owner(s) provide proof that a grading and drainage plan, prepared by a qualified Civil Engineer, licensed in the Province of Ontario, an Ontario Land Surveyor or a Certified Engineering Technologist, delineating the existing and proposed grades for both the severed and retained lands has been provided to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate.
That the Owner(s) enter into an Agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner(s), which is to be registered on title to deal with the following covenant/notice that shall run with the land and bind future owners on subsequent transfers:
“The property is located next to lands that have an existing source of environmental noise (Major Collector Road) and may therefore be subject to noise and other activities associated with that use.”
The Committee shall be provided a copy of the Agreement and written confirmation from City Legal Services that it has been registered on title.
- That the Owner(s) enter into a Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement, at the expense of the Owner(s), setting forth the obligations between the Owner(s) and the proposed future owners with respect to the joint use and maintenance of all common elements including, but not limited to, the common party walls, common structural elements such as roof, footings, soffits, and foundations.
The Owner shall ensure that the Agreement is binding upon all unit owners and successors in title and shall be to the satisfaction of Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, or City Legal Services. The Committee shall be provided written confirmation that the Agreement is satisfactory to the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, or is satisfactory to City Legal Services, as well as a copy of the Agreement and confirmation that it has been registered on title.
That the Owner(s) provide proof, to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, that the accessory structure has been demolished in accordance with the demolition permit if required or relocated in conformity with the Zoning By-law.
That the Owner/Applicant(s) enter(s) into a Development Agreement that would require a Grading and Servicing Plan/Site Plan/Stormwater Management Plan with the proposed elements/structures (driveways, parking, retaining walls, projections, services, etc.) designed and located based on the least impact to protected trees and tree cover, as well as a revised Tree Information Report provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Committee shall be provided written confirmation that the Agreement is satisfactory to the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, or is satisfactory to City Legal Services, as well as a copy of the Agreement and confirmation that it has been registered on title.
That the Owner/Applicant(s) enter(s) into a Development Agreement that would require the provision of a tree planting plan, prepared to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review All Wards Branch within Planning, Development and Building Services Department, or their designate, showing the location(s) and species or ultimate size of at least one new tree (50 mm caliper) per lot, in addition to any compensation trees required under the Tree Protection By-law.
That the Owner(s) submit a request for municipal addresses for each parcel, as required, to be assigned by the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official, or their designate. Confirmation of the assigned municipal addresses shall be provided in writing from Municipal Addressing, Building Code Services, to the Committee.
That the Owner(s) file with the Committee a copy of the registered Reference Plan prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor registered in the Province of Ontario, and signed by the Registrar, confirming the frontage and area of the severed land. If the Registered Plan does not indicate the lot area, a letter from the Surveyor confirming the area is required. The Registered Reference Plan must conform substantially to the Draft Reference Plan filed with the Application for Consent to the satisfaction of the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment or their designate.
That upon completion of the above conditions, and within the two-year period outlined above, the Owner(s) file with the Committee, the “electronic registration in preparation documents” for a conveyance for which the Consent is required to the satisfaction of the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment or their designate.