Committee of Adjustment
Comité de dérogation
DECISION
CONSENT/SEVERANCE
May 16, 2025
3 - Rural
D08-01-25/B-00065
Consent under section 53 of the Planning Act
Percy Pyper (1997) Ltd. 5360 Bank Street
20 - Osgoode
Part of Lot 29, Concession 4 (Rideau Front), Geographic Township of Gloucester
RU and ME2 2008-250
May 6, 2025, in person and by videoconference
Panel:
Application:
Applicant:
Property Address:
Ward:
Legal Description:
Zoning:
Zoning By-law:
Heard:
APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL AND PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATION
1The Applicant wants to convey a portion of its property to the abutting property owner to the west, known municipally as 5363 Albion Road.
2On February 10, 2023, the Committee granted provisional consent (File No.: D08- 01- 22/B-00356) to allow a lot line adjustment. However, the conditions of provisional consent were not fulfilled within the statutory time period and the application was deemed to be refused under the Planning Act.
CONSENT REQUIRED
3The Applicant seeks the Committee’s consent for a lot line adjustment.
4The severed land, shown as Parts 1 to 4 on Plan 4R-34411, is landlocked and will contain a lot area of 7.3979 hectares. This parcel is vacant and will be conveyed to the property to the west at 5363 Albion Road.
5The retained land, shown as Part 5 on 4R-34411, will have a frontage of 46.7 metres on Bank Street, an irregular depth, and a lot area of 6.7424 hectares. This parcel contains buildings used for storage and light industrial purposes and will be known municipally as 5360 Bank Street.
6The property is not the subject of any other current application under the Planning Act.
PUBLIC HEARING
Oral Submissions Summary
7Christine McCuaig, agent for the Applicant, and City Planner Luke Teeft were present.
8There were no objections to granting this unopposed application as part of the Panel’s fast-track consent agenda.
DECISION AND REASONS OF THE COMMITTEE: APPLICATION GRANTED
Application Must Satisfy Statutory Tests
9Under the Planning Act, the Committee has the power to grant a consent if it is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality. Also, the Committee must be satisfied that an application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and has regard for matters of provincial interest under section 2 of the Act, as well as the following criteria set out in subsection 51(24):
Criteria
(24) In considering a draft plan of subdivision, regard shall be had, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience, accessibility for persons with disabilities and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality and to,
a) the effect of development of the proposed subdivision on matters of provincial interest as referred to in section 2;
b) whether the proposed subdivision is premature or in the public interest;
c) whether the plan conforms to the official plan and adjacent plans of subdivision, if any;
d) the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided;
d.1) if any affordable housing units are being proposed, the suitability of the proposed units for affordable housing;
e) the number, width, location and proposed grades and elevations of highways, and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and the adequacy of them;
f) the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots;
g) the restrictions or proposed restrictions, if any, on the land proposed to be subdivided or the buildings and structures proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on adjoining land;
h) conservation of natural resources and flood control;
i) the adequacy of utilities and municipal services;
j) the adequacy of school sites;
k) the area of land, if any, within the proposed subdivision that, exclusive of highways, is to be conveyed or dedicated for public purposes;
l) the extent to which the plan’s design optimizes the available supply, means of supplying, efficient use and conservation of energy; and
m) the interrelationship between the design of the proposed plan of subdivision and site plan control matters relating to any development on the land, if the land is also located within a site plan control area designated under subsection 41 (2) of this Act or subsection 114 (2)
of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. 1994, c. 23, s. 30; 2001, c. 32, s. 31 (2); 2006, c. 23, s. 22 (3, 4); 2016, c. 25, Sched. 4, s. 8 (2).
Evidence
10Evidence considered by the Committee included all oral submissions made at the hearing, as highlighted above, and the following written submissions held on file with the Secretary-Treasurer and available from the Committee Coordinator upon request:
Application and supporting documents, including cover letter, plans, parcel abstract, supplemental mineral resource impact assessment, environmental impact statement, photo of the posted sign, and a sign posting declaration.
City Planning Report received May 1, 2025, with no concerns.
South Nation Conservation Authority email received April 29, 2025, with no objections.
Hydro Ottawa email received April 16, 2025, with comments.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation email received April 15, 2025, with no comments.
Effect of Submissions on Decision
11The Committee considered all written and oral submissions relating to the application in making its decision and granted the application.
12The Committee notes that the City’s Planning Report raises “no concerns” regarding the application, subject to the City’s requested conditions agreed to by the Applicant’s agent.
13Based on the evidence, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement that promotes efficient land use and development as well as intensification and redevelopment within built-up areas, based on local conditions.
14The Committee is also satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard to matters of provincial interest, including the orderly development of safe and healthy communities; the appropriate location of growth and development; and the protection of public health and safety.
15Additionally, the Committee is satisfied that a plan of subdivision of the land is not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality.
16Moreover, the Committee is satisfied that the proposal has adequate regard for the criteria specified under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act and is in the public interest.
17THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ORDERS that the application is granted and the provisional consent is to be given, subject to the conditions set out in Appendix A to this decision.
"Terence Otto" TERENCE OTTO VICE-CHAIR
"Gary Duncan" GARY DUNCAN MEMBER
"Beth Henderson" BETH HENDERSON MEMBER
"Martin Vervoort"
MARTIN VERVOORT MEMBER
"Jocelyn Chandler"
JOCELYN CHANDLER MEMBER
I certify this is a true copy of the Decision of the Committee of Adjustment of the City of Ottawa, dated May 16, 2025.
“Michel Bellemare”
MICHEL BELLEMARE SECRETARY-TREASURER
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
To appeal this decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), a completed appeal form and the filing fee must be submitted via one of the below options and must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on June 5, 2025.
OLT E-FILE SERVICE – An appeal can be filed online through the E-File Portal. First-time users will need to register for a My Ontario Account. Select [Ottawa (City): Committee of Adjustment] as the Approval Authority. To complete the appeal, fill in all the required fields and provide the filing fee by credit card.
BY EMAIL - Appeal packages can be submitted by email to cofa@ottawa.ca. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Tribunal. Please indicate on the appeal form that payment will be made by credit card.
IN PERSON – Appeal packages can be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, 101 Centrepointe Drive, 4th floor, Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 5K7. The appeal form is available on the OLT website at Forms | Ontario Land Tribunal. In person payment can be made by certified cheque or money order made payable to the Ontario Minister of Finance, or by credit card. Please indicate on the appeal form if you wish to pay by credit card.
Please note only one of the above options needs to be completed. If your preferred method of appeal is not available at the time of filing, the appeal must be filed with one of the other two options.
The Ontario Land Tribunal has established a filing fee of $400.00 per type of application with an additional filing fee of $25.00 for each secondary application.
Only the applicant, the Minister or a specified person or public body that has an interest in the matter may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. A “specified person” does not include an individual or a community association.
There are no provisions for the Committee of Adjustment or the Ontario Land Tribunal to extend the statutory deadline to file an appeal. If the deadline is not met, the OLT does not have the authority to hold a hearing to consider your appeal.
If you have any questions about the appeal process, please visit File an Appeal | Ontario Land Tribunal
NOTICE TO APPLICANT(S)
Should a Development Agreement be required, such request should be initiated 30 working days prior to lapsing date of the consent and should include all required documentation including that related to transfers, easements, and postponements, and all approved technical studies. If you do not fulfill the conditions of provisional consent within the two-year period, the Planning Act provides that your application “shall be deemed to be refused”.
Ce document est également offert en français.
Committee of Adjustment
City of Ottawa
Ottawa.ca/CommitteeofAdjustment
613-580-2436
Comité de dérogation
Ville d’Ottawa
Ottawa.ca/Comitedederogation
613-580-2436
APPENDIX A
That the Owner(s) convey to the City, at no cost to the City, an unencumbered road widening across the complete 46.75 metres Bank Street frontage of the lands, measuring 20 meters from the existing centerline of pavement/the abutting right-of- way, pursuant to Section 50.1(25)(c) of the Planning Act and Schedule C16 of the City’s new Official Plan. The exact widening must be determined by legal survey. The Owner shall provide a reference plan for registration, indicating the widening, to the City Surveyor for review and approval prior to its deposit in the Land Registry Office. Such reference plan must be tied to the Horizontal Control Network in accordance with the municipal requirements and guidelines for referencing legal surveys. The Owner(s) must provide to the City Surveyor a copy of the Committee of Adjustment Decision and a draft Reference Plan that sets out the required widening. The Committee requires written confirmation from City Legal Services that the transfer of the widening to the City has been registered. All costs shall be borne by the Owner.
That the Owner(s) obtain a Zoning By-law Amendment, at the expense of the Owner(s) and to the satisfaction of the Manager of the Development Review All- Wards branch, or their designate, to be confirmed in writing from the Department to the Committee, which rezones the retained lands such that the property is zoning compliant, with all levels of appeal exhausted.
That the Owner(s) provide evidence to the satisfaction of the Manager of the Development Review All-Wards branch, or their designate, to be confirmed in writing from the Department to the Committee, that all buildings, structures, and services on the retained parcel have the necessary permits and comply with the Site Plan Control By-law.
That the Owner(s) enter into a Development Agreement with the City, at the expense of the Owner(s) and to the satisfaction of the Manager of the Development Review All-Wards branch, or their designate, which includes the recommendations and/or mitigation measures of any report, study, and/or plan required for the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications which are required as conditions of approval for this Consent Application. The Development Agreement is only required if determined through the City’s review of said reports, studies, and/or plan(s).
That the Owner(s) enter into an Agreement with the City, only if required, at the expense of the Owner(s) and to the satisfaction of the Manager of the Development Review All-Wards branch, or their designate, which provides the following covenant/notice that runs with the land and binds future Owner(s) on subsequent transfers:
“The City of Ottawa does not guarantee the quality or quantity of the groundwater. If, at some future date, the quality or the quantity of the groundwater becomes deficient, the City of Ottawa bears no responsibility, financial or otherwise, to provide solutions to the deficiency, such solutions being the sole responsibility of the homeowner.”
The Committee requires a copy of the Agreement and written confirmation from City Legal Services that it has been registered on title.
- That the Owner(s) file with the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment the following:
a. A copy of the reference plan and/or legal description of the severed land and the deed or instrument conveying the severed land to the owner of the abutting property, known municipally as , so that no new lot is being created, in accordance with paragraph (b) below.
b. A Certificate of Official attached to the deed/transfer required by paragraph (a) above containing the following endorsement:
“The lands to be severed are for the purpose of a lot addition only to the abutting lands owned by (insert name) described as PIN (insert property identification number) being Part(s) (insert numbers) on Plan (insert plan number), not for the creation of a new lot, and any subsequent transfer, charge or other transaction involving the lands to be severed shall be subject to compliance with Section 50(3) or Section 50(5) of the Planning Act, as applicable. Neither the lands to be severed nor the abutting lands are to be transferred, charged, or otherwise re-conveyed in the future without the other parcel unless a further consent is obtained.
The owner(s) shall cause the lands to be severed to be consolidated on title with the abutting lands and for this condition to be entered on the parcel register for the consolidated parcel as a restriction.”
c. An undertaking from a solicitor authorized to practice law in the Province of Ontario, and in good standing with the Law Society of Upper Canada, as follows:
“In consideration of, and notwithstanding the issuance of the Certificate under Section 50(12) of the Planning Act in respect to the subject Application for Consent, I undertake on behalf of the Owner, within 30 days of the registration on title of the transfer document containing the endorsement set out in the Certificate of Official issued by the Committee of Adjustment, to file an Application to Consolidate Parcels including the severed land (Part of PIN (insert number) and the abutting land (PIN insert number). This PIN consolidation is intended to reinforce the Planning Act stipulation in the condition outlined above that both parcels have merged on Title and cannot be conveyed separately in the future. I further undertake to forward a copy of the registered Application to Consolidate Parcels and a copy of the Consolidated Parcel abstract page(s) to the Committee office within 21 days of the registration of the Application to Consolidate Parcels”.
d. Where the parcel consolidation stipulated in paragraph (b) and the solicitor’s undertaking in paragraph (c) above cannot be completed because the parcels of land to be merged have different estate qualifiers, an application to annex restrictive covenant under Section 118 of the Land Titles Act must be registered on the title of both the severed lands and on the abutting parcel that is to be merged. The covenant, which is to be to the satisfaction of the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment, shall advise all future purchasers that the parcels must be dealt with together and not separately, and contain wording set out below or similar wording acceptable to the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment:
“These lands have been merged and may not be dealt with separately, without applying for a consent of the Committee of Adjustment.”
In lieu of the undertaking provided in paragraph (c), a replacement undertaking by the solicitor must be filed undertaking on behalf of the owner(s) to register the restrictive covenant on both property titles within 30 days of the registration of the transfer document containing the endorsement of the Certificate of Official issued by the Committee of Adjustment for this application and to file a copy of the registered restrictive covenant with the Committee of Adjustment within 21 days of the registration of the document.
That the Owner(s) file with the Committee a copy of the registered Reference Plan prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor registered in the Province of Ontario, and signed by the Registrar, confirming the frontage and area of the severed land. If the Registered Plan does not indicate the lot area, a letter from the Surveyor confirming the area is required. The Registered Reference Plan must conform substantially to the Draft Reference Plan filed with the Application for Consent.
That upon completion of the above conditions, and within the two-year period outlined above, the Owner(s) file with the Committee, the “electronic registration in preparation documents” for a lot line adjustment for which the consent is required.