In the Matter of AGF Investments Inc., 2020 CanLII 790

January 13, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF ONTARIO (the Jurisdiction)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AGF INVESTMENTS INC. (the Filer)

DECISION

Background

The principal regulator in the Jurisdiction has received an application (the Application) from the Filer on behalf of existing and future mutual funds of which the Filer or an affiliate of the Filer is, or in the future will be, the investment fund manager and to which National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds (NI 81-102) applies, including AGF U.S. Small-Mid Cap Fund (the Fund),(collectively, the Funds) for a decision under the securities legislation of the Jurisdiction of the principal regulator (the Legislation) for an exemption from the requirements set out in paragraphs 15.3(4)(c) and 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81-102, which provide that a sales communication must not refer to a performance rating or ranking of a mutual fund or asset allocation service unless:

1. the rating or ranking is provided for each period for which standard performance data is required to be given, except the period since the inception of the mutual fund; and

2. the rating or ranking is to the same calendar month end that is:

a) not more than 45 days before the date of the appearance or use of the advertisement in which it is included, and

b) not more than three months before the date of first publication of any other sales communication in which it is included;

(together, the Exemption Sought), to permit the Lipper Awards and Lipper Leader Ratings to be referenced in sales communications relating to the Funds.

Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a passport application):

a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this Application, and

b) the Filer has provided notice that section 4.7(1) of Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System (MI 11-102) is intended to be relied upon in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan and Yukon (together with Ontario, the Jurisdictions).

Interpretation

Terms defined in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions, MI 11-102 and NI 81-102 have the same meanings if used in this decision, unless otherwise defined.

Representations

This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:

The Filer and the Funds

1. The Filer is a corporation amalgamated under the laws of the Province of Ontario with its head office in Toronto, Ontario.

2. The Filer is registered in the categories of (a) exempt market dealer in the Provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Saskatchewan, (b) portfolio manager in each of the Jurisdictions, (c) investment fund manager in the Provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Ontario and Quebec, (d) a mutual fund dealer in the Provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec, and (e) a commodity trading manager in the Province of Ontario.

3. The Filer manages the Funds, each of which is, or will be, a retail mutual fund established under the laws of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada. The securities of each of the Funds of are, or will be, qualified for distribution pursuant to one or more prospectuses or simplified prospectuses, which may be amended or renewed from time to time, prepared and filed in accordance with the securities legislation of each applicable Jurisdiction.

4. Each of the Funds is, or will be, a reporting issuer in each of the Jurisdictions. Each of the Funds is or will be subject to NI 81-102, including Part 15 of NI 81-102, which governs sales communications.

5. Neither the Filer nor the Funds are in default of securities legislation in any of the Jurisdictions.

Lipper Leader Ratings and Lipper Awards

6. The Filer wishes to include in sales communications of the Funds references to the Lipper Leader Ratings (which are performance ratings or rankings for funds issued by Lipper and include the Lipper Ratings for Total Return, Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return, Lipper Ratings for Preservation and the Lipper Ratings for Expense, which are described below) and Lipper Awards (as described below) where such Funds have been awarded a Lipper Award.

7. Lipper, Inc. (Lipper) is a “mutual fund rating entity” as that term is defined in NI 81-102. Lipper is entirely owned by Refinitiv (formerly the Financial and Risk business of Thomson Reuters) and is a supplier of mutual fund information, analytical tools, and commentary. Lipper's fund data and analysis, fund awards designations and ratings information provide valuable insight to advisors, media and individual investors.

8. One of Lipper's programs is the Lipper Fund Awards from Refinitiv program (the Lipper Awards). This program recognizes funds that have excelled in delivering consistently strong risk-adjusted performance relative to peers and also recognizes fund families with high average scores for all funds within a particular asset class or overall. Currently, the Lipper Awards take place in over 20 countries.

9. In Canada, the Lipper Awards include the Lipper Fund Awards and Lipper ETF Awards. For the Lipper Fund Awards, Lipper designates award-winning funds in most individual fund classifications for three, five and ten year periods.

10. The fund classifications used by Lipper for the Lipper Awards in respect of Canadian funds are those maintained by the Canadian Investment Funds Standards Committee (“CIFSC”) (or a successor to the CIFSC), a Canadian organization that is independent of Lipper.

11. The Lipper Awards are based on a proprietary rating methodology prepared by Lipper, the Lipper Leader Rating for Consistent Return. The Lipper Leader Rating System is a toolkit that helps guide investors and their advisors in selecting funds that suit individual investment styles and goals. The Lipper Leaders Rating System uses investor-centered criteria to deliver a simple, clear description of a fund’s success in meeting certain goals, such as preserving capital or building wealth through consistent, strong returns. The strength of Lipper Ratings are their use in conjunction with one another. They can be used together to identify funds that meet the particular characteristics of the investor.

12. In Canada, the Lipper Leader Rating System includes Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return (reflecting funds’ historical risk-adjusted returns relative to funds in the same classification), Lipper Ratings for Total Return (reflecting funds’ historical total return performance relative to funds in the same classification), Lipper Ratings for Preservation (reflecting funds' historical loss avoidance relative to other funds in the same classification) and Lipper Ratings for Expense (reflecting funds' expense minimization relative to funds with similar load structures). In each case, the fund classification used by Lipper for the Lipper Leader Ratings are those maintained by CIFSC (or a successor to CIFSC). Lipper Leader Ratings are measured monthly over 36, 60 and 120 month periods, and an overall rating is also measured, which is an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for each measure over 36, 60 and 120 month periods, if applicable. The highest 20% of funds in each category are named Lipper Leaders for that particular rating, the next 20% receive a score of 4, the middle 20% receive a score of 3, the next 20% receive a score of 2 and the lowest 20% receive a score of 1.

13. The Lipper Awards, awarded annually in Canada, are based on the Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return measure, which, as generally described above, is a risk-adjusted mutual fund return performance measure used by Lipper that takes into account both short- and long-term risk-adjusted performance relative to fund classification. In respect of the Lipper Awards for Canada, the Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return are measured over the 36, 60 and 120 month periods ending at the end of July of each year. As noted above, the highest 20% of funds in each classification are named Lipper Leaders for Consistent Return, and the highest Lipper Leader for Consistent Return in each applicable fund classification over these periods (currently, in the case of the Lipper ETF Awards, over the 36 month period only) wins a Lipper Award.

Sales Communication Disclosure

14. The Lipper Leader Ratings are performance ratings or rankings under NI 81-102 and Lipper Awards may be considered to be performance ratings or rankings under NI 81-102 given that the awards are based on the Lipper Leader Ratings as described above. Therefore, references to Lipper Leader Ratings and Lipper Awards in sales communications relating to the Funds need to meet the applicable requirements in Part 15 of NI 81-102.

15. Section 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 imposes a “matching” requirement for performance ratings or rankings that are included in sales communications for mutual funds. If a performance rating or ranking is referred to in a sales communication, the performance rating or ranking must be provided for, or “match”, each period for which standard performance data is required to be given for the fund except for the period since the inception of the fund.

16. In Canada and elsewhere, Lipper Leader Ratings are calculated only for 36, 60 and 120 month periods and are not calculated for a one year period. This means that a sales communication referencing a Lipper Leader Rating cannot comply with the “matching” requirement contained in paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 because a rating is not available for the one year period. Relief from paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 is therefore required in order for Funds to reference Lipper Leader Ratings in sales communications.

17. In addition, a sales communication referencing the overall Lipper Leader Ratings and the Lipper Awards, which are based on the Lipper Leader Ratings, must disclose the corresponding Lipper Leader Rating for each period for which standard performance data is required to be given. As noted above, because a rating for the one year period is not available for the Lipper Leader Ratings, sales communications referencing the overall Lipper Leader Ratings or Lipper Awards also cannot comply with the matching requirement contained in paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102.

18. The exemption in subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 for references to overall ratings or rankings of funds cannot be relied upon to reference the overall Lipper Leader Ratings or Lipper Awards in sales communications for the Funds because subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 is available only if a sales communication “otherwise complies” with the requirements of subsection 15.3(4) of NI 81-102. As noted above, sales communications referencing the overall Lipper Leader Ratings or Lipper Awards cannot comply with the “matching” requirement in subsection 15.3(4) of NI 81-102 because the underlying Lipper Leader Ratings are not available for the one year period, rendering the exemption in subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 unavailable. Relief from paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 is therefore required in order for the Funds to reference overall Lipper Leader Ratings and the Lipper Awards in sales communications.

19. Paragraph 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81-102 imposes certain restrictions on disclosure in sales communications. The paragraph provides that in order for a rating or ranking such as a Lipper Award to be used in an advertisement, the advertisement must be published within 45 days of the calendar month end to which the rating or ranking applies. Further, in order for the rating or ranking to be used in any other sales communication, the rating or ranking must be published within three months of the calendar month end to which the rating or ranking applies.

20. Because the evaluation of funds for the Lipper Awards will be based on data aggregated until the end of July in any given year and the results will be published in November of that year, by the time a fund receives an award in November, paragraph 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81-102 will prohibit it from publishing news of the award altogether.

21. The Exemption Sought is required in order for Lipper Leader Ratings and Lipper Awards to be referenced in sales communications relating to the Funds.

22. The Filer submits that the Lipper Awards and Lipper Leader Ratings provide important tools for investors, as they provide investors with context when evaluating investment choices. These awards and ratings provide an objective, transparent and quantitative measure of performance that is based on the expertise of Lipper in fund analysis that alleviates any concern that references to them may be misleading and therefore, contrary to paragraph 15.2(1)(a) of NI 81-102.

Decision

The principal regulator is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the principal regulator to make the decision.

The decision of the principal regulator under the Legislation is that the Exemption Sought is granted to permit the Lipper Awards and Lipper Leader Ratings to be referenced in sales communications relating to a Fund, provided that:

1. the sales communication complies with Part 15 of NI 81-102, other than as set out herein, and contains the following disclosure in at least 10 point type:

a) the name of the category for which the Fund has received the award or rating;

b) the number of mutual funds in the category for the applicable period;

c) the name of the ranking entity, i.e., Lipper;

d) the length of period and the ending date, or, the first day of the period and the ending date on which the Lipper Award or Lipper Leader Rating is based;

e) a statement that Lipper Leader Ratings are subject to change every month;

f) in the case of a Lipper Award, a brief overview of the Lipper Award;

g) in the case of a Lipper Leader Rating (other than Lipper Leader Ratings referenced in connection with a Lipper Award), a brief overview of the Lipper Leader Rating;

h) where Lipper Awards are referenced, the corresponding Lipper Leader Rating that the Lipper Award is derived from is presented for each period for which standard performance data is required other than the one year and since inception periods;

i) where a Lipper Leader Rating is referenced, the Lipper Leader Ratings are presented for each period for which standard performance data is required other than the one year and since inception periods;

j) disclosure of the meaning of the Lipper Leader Ratings from 1 to 5 (e.g., the highest 20% of funds in each peer group are named Lipper Leaders, the next 20% receive a rating of 4, the middle 20% are rated 3, the next 20% are rated 2 an the lowest 20% are rated 1); and

k) reference to Lipper's website (www.lipperalpha.refinitiv.com) for greater detail on the Lipper Awards and Lipper Leader Ratings, which includes the rating methodology prepared by Lipper;

2. the Lipper Awards being referenced must not have been awarded more than 365 days before the date of the sales communication; and

3. the Lipper Awards and Lipper Leader Ratings being referenced are calculated based on comparisons of performance of mutual funds within a specified category established by the CIFSC (or a successor to the CIFSC).

“Darren McKall”

Darren McKall, Manager Investment Funds and Structured Products Branch Ontario Securities Commission

SEDAR No. 3004133, 3004136, 3004138, 3004137

Application No. 2019/0641