Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc., 2020 CanLII 2734

January 21, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF ONTARIO (the Jurisdiction)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS

AND

IN THE MATTER OF SUN LIFE GLOBAL INVESTMENTS (CANADA) INC. (the Filer)

DECISION

Background

The principal regulator in the Jurisdiction has received an application (the Application) from the Filer on behalf of existing and future mutual funds of which the Filer or an affiliate of the Filer is, or in the future will be, the investment fund manager and to which National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds (NI 81-102) applies (each a Fund and collectively, the Funds) for a decision under the securities legislation of the Jurisdiction of the principal regulator (the Legislation) for an exemption under section 19.1 of NI 81-102 from the requirements set out in paragraphs 15.3(4)(c) and 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81-102, which provide that a sales communication must not refer to a performance rating or ranking of a mutual fund or asset allocation service unless:

1. the rating or ranking is provided for each period for which standard performance data is required to be given, except the period since the inception of the mutual fund; and

2. the rating or ranking is to the same calendar month end that is:

(a) not more than 45 days before the date of the appearance or use of the advertisement in which it is included, and

(b) not more than three months before the date of first publication of any other sales communication in which it is included;

(together, the Exemption Sought), to permit the FundGrade A+ Awards, FundGrade Ratings, Lipper Awards and Lipper Leaders ratings to be referenced in sales communications relating to the Funds.

Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a passport application):

(a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application, and

(b) the Filer has provided notice that section 4.7(1) of Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System (MI 11-102) is intended to be relied upon in each of the other provinces and territories of Canada (together with Ontario, the Jurisdictions).

Interpretation

Terms defined in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions, MI 11-102 and NI 81-102 have the same meanings if used in this decision, unless otherwise defined.

Representations

This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:

The Filer and the Funds

1. The Filer is a corporation governed by the laws of Canada with its head office located in Toronto, Ontario.

2. The Filer is registered as: (i) an investment fund manager in Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador; (ii) a commodity trading manager in Ontario; (iii) a portfolio manager in Ontario; and (iv) a mutual fund dealer in each of the Jurisdictions.

3. The Filer is, or will be, the manager of each of the Funds.

4. Each of the Funds is, or will be, an open-ended mutual fund trust established under the laws of Ontario or a class of shares of a mutual fund corporation established under the laws of Ontario. The securities of each of the Funds are, or will be, qualified for distribution pursuant to one or more prospectuses or simplified prospectuses, as the same may be amended or renewed from time to time. Each of the Funds is, or will be, a reporting issuer in each of the Jurisdictions.

5. Each of the Funds is, or will be, subject to NI 81-102, including Part 15 of NI 81-102, which governs sales communications.

6. Neither the Filer nor any of the existing Funds is in default of the securities legislation in any of the Jurisdictions.

FundGrade Ratings and FundGrade A+ Awards

7. The Filer wishes to include in sales communications of the Funds references to the FundGrade Ratings and references to the FundGrade A+ Awards, where such Funds have been awarded a FundGradeA+ Award.

8. Fundata Canada Inc. (Fundata) is a “mutual fund rating entity” as that term is defined in NI 81-102. Fundata is a supplier of mutual fund information, analytical tools, and commentary. Fundata’s fund data and analysis, fund awards designations and ratings information provide valuable insight to advisors, media and individual investors.

9. One of Fundata’s programs is the FundGrade A+ Awards program. This program highlights funds that have excelled in delivering consistently strong risk-adjusted performance relative to their peers. The FundGrade A+ Awards designate award-winning funds in most individual fund classifications for the previous calendar year, and the awards are announced in January of each year. The categories for fund classification used by Fundata are those maintained by the Canadian Investment Funds Standards Committee (CIFSC) (or a successor to CIFSC), a Canadian organization that is independent of Fundata.

10. The FundGrade A+ Awards are based on a proprietary rating methodology developed by Fundata, the FundGrade Rating system. The FundGrade Rating system evaluates funds based on their risk adjusted performance, measured by three well-known and widely-used metrics: the Sharpe Ratio, the Information Ratio, and the Sortino Ratio. The ratios are calculated for the two through ten year time periods for each fund. When there is more than one eligible series of a fund, an average ratio is taken for each period. The ratios are ranked across all time periods and an overall score is calculated by equally weighting the yearly rankings.

11. The FundGrade Ratings are letter grades for each fund and are determined for each month. The FundGrade Ratings for each month are released on the seventh business day of the following month. The top 10% of funds earn an A Grade; the next 20% of funds earn a B Grade; the next 40% of funds earn a C Grade; the next 20% of funds receive a D Grade; and the lowest 10% of funds receive an E Grade. Because the overall score of a fund is calculated by equally weighting the periodic rankings, to receive an A Grade, a fund must show consistently high scores for all ratios across all time periods.

12. Fundata calculates a grade using only the retail series of each fund. Institutional series or fee-based series of any fund are not included in the calculation. A fund must have at least two years of history to be included in the calculation. Once a letter grade is calculated for a fund, it is then applied to all related series of that fund.

13. At the end of each calendar year, Fundata calculates a fund grade point average or “GPA” for each fund based on the full year’s performance. The fund GPA is calculated by converting each month’s FundGrade Rating letter grade into a numerical score. Each A is assigned a grade of 4.0; each B is assigned a grade of 3.0; each C is assigned a grade of 2.0; each D is assigned a grade of 1.0; and each E is assigned a grade of 0. The total of the grades for each fund is divided by 12 to arrive at the fund’s GPA for the year. Any fund earning a GPA of 3.5 or greater earns a FundGrade A+ Award.

14. When a fund is awarded a FundGrade A+ Award, Fundata will permit such funds to make reference to the award in its sales communications.

Lipper Leaders Ratings and Lipper Awards

15. The Filer also wishes to include in sales communications of the Funds references to the Lipper Leaders Ratings (which are performance ratings or rankings for funds issued by Lipper and include the Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return, Lipper Ratings for Total Return, Lipper Ratings for Preservation and the Lipper Ratings for Expense, which are described below) and references to the Lipper Awards (as described below), where such Funds have been awarded a Lipper Award.

16. Lipper, Inc. (Lipper) is a “mutual fund rating entity” as that term is defined in NI 81-102, and is not a member of the organization of the Funds. Lipper is part of the Refinitiv group of companies, and is a global leader in supplying mutual fund information, analytical tools, and commentary. Lipper's fund data and analysis, fund awards designations and ratings information provide valuable insight to advisors, media and individual investors.

17. One of Lipper’s programs is the Lipper Fund Awards from Refinitiv program (the Lipper Awards). This program recognizes funds that have excelled in delivering consistently strong risk-adjusted performance relative to peers and also recognizes fund families with high average scores for all funds within a particular asset class or overall. Currently, the Lipper Awards take place in 23 award universes.

18. In Canada, the Lipper Awards include the Lipper Fund Awards and Lipper ETF Awards (which were awarded for the first time in Canada in 2014). For the Lipper Fund Awards, Lipper designates award-winning funds in most individual fund classifications for three, five and ten year periods. For the Lipper ETF Awards, Lipper designates award-winning funds in a number of individual fund classifications for the three and five year periods, and it is expected that awards for the ten year period will be given in the future.

19. The categories for fund classification used by Lipper for the Lipper Awards in respect of Canadian funds are those maintained by CIFSC (or a successor to CIFSC), a Canadian organization that is independent of Lipper. Only those CIFSC groups of ten or more unique funds will claim a Lipper Fund Award, and only those CIFSC groups of five or more unique ETFs (each of whom have a minimum of three years or five years of performance history) will claim a Lipper ETF Award.

20. The Lipper Awards are based on a proprietary rating methodology prepared by Lipper, the Lipper Leaders Rating System. The Lipper Leaders Rating System is a toolkit that uses investor-centred criteria to deliver a simple, clear description of a fund’s success in meeting certain goals, such as preserving capital, lowering expenses or building wealth. Lipper Ratings provide an instant measure of a fund’s success against a specific set of key metrics, and can be useful to investors in identifying funds that meet particular characteristics.

21. In Canada, the Lipper Leaders Rating System includes Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return (reflecting funds’ historical risk-adjusted returns relative to funds in the same classification), Lipper Ratings for Total Return (reflecting funds’ historical total return performance relative to funds in the same classification), Lipper Ratings for Preservation (reflecting funds’ historical loss avoidance relative to other funds in the same classification), Lipper Ratings for Tax Efficiency (reflecting funds’ historical success in postponing taxable distributions relative to funds in the same classification), and Lipper Ratings for Expense (reflecting funds’ expense minimization relative to funds with similar load structures). In each case, the categories for fund classification used by Lipper for the Lipper Leaders Ratings are those maintained by CIFSC (or a successor to CIFSC). Lipper Leaders Ratings are measured monthly over 36, 60 and 120 month periods, and an overall rating is also measured, which is an unweighted average of the previous three periods. The highest 20% of funds in each category are named Lipper Leaders for that particular rating and receive a score of 5, the next 20% receive a score of 4, the middle 20% receive a score of 3, the next 20% receive a score of 2 and the lowest 20% receive a score of 1.

22. The Lipper Awards, awarded annually in Canada, are based on the Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return measure, which, as generally described above, is a risk-adjusted mutual fund return performance measure used by Lipper that takes into account both short- and long-term risk-adjusted performance relative to fund classification, together with a measure of a fund’s consistency. In respect of the Lipper Awards for Canada, the Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return are measured over the 36, 60 and 120 month periods ending at the end of July of each year. As noted above, the highest 20% of funds in each classification are named Lipper Leaders for Consistent Return, and the highest Lipper Leader for Consistent Return in each applicable fund classification over these periods (currently, in the case of the Lipper ETF Awards, over the 36 and 60 month periods only) wins a Lipper Award.

Sales Communication Disclosure

23. The FundGrade Ratings fall within the definition of “performance data” under NI 81-102 as they constitute “a rating, ranking, quotation, discussion or analysis regarding an aspect of the investment performance of an investment fund”, given that the FundGrade Ratings are based on performance measures calculated by Fundata. The FundGrade A+ Awards may be considered to be “overall ratings or rankings” given that the awards are based on the FundGrade Ratings as described above. Therefore, references to FundGrade Ratings and FundGrade A+ Awards in sales communications relating to the Funds need to meet the applicable requirements in Part 15 of NI 81-102.

24. Paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 imposes a “matching” requirement for performance ratings or rankings that are included in sales communications for mutual funds. If a performance rating or ranking is referred to in a sales communication, it must be provided for, or “match”, each period for which standard performance data is required to be given for a fund, except for the period since the inception of the fund (i.e. for one, three, five and ten year periods, as applicable).

25. While FundGrade Ratings are based on calculations for a minimum of two years through to a maximum of ten years and the FundGrade A+ Awards are based on a yearly average of monthly FundGrade Ratings, specific ratings for the three, five and ten year periods within the two to ten year measurement period are not given. This means that a sales communication referencing FundGrade Ratings cannot comply with the “matching” requirement contained in paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102. Relief from paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 is, therefore, required in order for a Fund to use FundGrade Ratings in sales communications.

26. The exemption in subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 for references to overall ratings or rankings of funds cannot be relied upon to reference the FundGrade A+ Awards in sales communications for the Funds because it is available only if a sales communication “otherwise complies” with the requirements of subsection 15.3(4) of NI 81-102. As noted above, sales communications referencing the FundGrade A+ Awards cannot comply with the “matching” requirement in subsection 15.3(4) of NI 81-102 because the underlying FundGrade Ratings are not available for the three, five and ten year periods within the two to ten year measurement period for the FundGrade Ratings, rendering the exemption in subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 unavailable. Relief from subsection 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81‑102 is, therefore, required in order for Funds to reference the FundGrade A+ Awards in sales communications.

27. Paragraph 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81-102 imposes certain restrictions on disclosure in sales communications. This paragraph provides that in order for a rating or ranking such as a FundGrade A+ Award to be used in an advertisement, the advertisement must be published within 45 days of the calendar month end to which the rating or ranking applies. Further, in order for the rating or ranking to be used in any other sales communication, the rating or ranking must be published within three months of the calendar month end to which the rating or ranking applies.

28. Because the evaluation of funds for the FundGrade A+ Awards will be based on data aggregated until the end of December in any given year and the results will be published in January of the following year, by the time a fund receives FundGrade A+ Award in January, paragraph 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81-102 will only allow the FundGrade A+ Award to be used in an advertisement until the middle of February and in other sales communications until the end of March.

29. The Lipper Leaders Ratings are performance ratings or rankings under NI 81-102 and Lipper Awards may be considered to be performance ratings or rankings under NI 81-102 given that the awards are based on the Lipper Leaders Ratings as described above. Therefore, references to Lipper Leaders Ratings and Lipper Awards in sales communications relating to the Funds need to meet the applicable requirements in Part 15 of 81-102.

30. In Canada and elsewhere, Lipper Leaders Ratings are calculated only for 36, 60 and 120 month periods and are not calculated for a one year period. This means that a sales communication referencing a Lipper Leaders Rating cannot comply with the “matching” requirement contained in paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 because a rating is not available for the one year period. Relief from paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102 is therefore required in order for Funds to reference Lipper Leaders Ratings in sales communications.

31. In addition, a sales communication referencing the overall Lipper Leaders Ratings and the Lipper Awards, which are based on the Lipper Leaders Ratings, must disclose the corresponding Lipper Leaders Rating for each period for which standard performance data is required to be given. As noted above, because a rating for the one year period is not available for the Lipper Leaders Ratings, sales communications referencing the overall Lipper Leaders Ratings or Lipper Awards also cannot comply with the matching requirement contained in paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81-102.

32. The exemption in subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 for references to overall ratings or rankings of funds cannot be relied upon to reference the overall Lipper Leaders Ratings or Lipper Awards in sales communications for the Funds because subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 is available only if a sales communication “otherwise complies” with the requirements of subsection 15.3(4) of NI 81-102. As noted above, sales communications referencing the overall Lipper Leaders Ratings or Lipper Awards cannot comply with the “matching” requirement in subsection 15.3(4) of NI 81-102 because the underlying Lipper Leaders Ratings are not available for the one year period, rendering the exemption in subsection 15.3(4.1) of NI 81-102 unavailable. Relief from paragraph 15.3(4)(c) of NI 81‑102 is therefore required in order for the Funds to reference overall Lipper Leaders Ratings and the Lipper Awards in sales communications.

33. Paragraph 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81-102 imposes certain restrictions on disclosure in sales communications. The paragraph provides that in order for a rating or ranking such as a Lipper Award to be used in an advertisement, the advertisement must be published within 45 days of the calendar month end to which the rating or ranking applies. Further, in order for the rating or ranking to be used in any other sales communication, the rating or ranking must be published within three months of the calendar month end to which the rating or ranking applies.

34. Because the evaluation of funds for the Lipper Awards will be based on data aggregated until the end of July in any given year and the results will be published in November of that year, by the time a fund receives an award in November, paragraph 15.3(4)(f) of NI 81‑102 will prohibit it from publishing news of the award altogether.

35. The Exemption Sought is required in order for the FundGrade Ratings, FundGrade A+ Awards, Lipper Leaders Ratings, and Lipper Awards to be referenced in sales communications relating to the Funds.

36. The Filer submits that the FundGrade A+ Awards, FundGrade Ratings, Lipper Awards and Lipper Leaders Ratings provide important tools for investors, as they provide investors with context when evaluating investment choices. These awards and ratings provide an objective, transparent and quantitative measure of performance that is based on the expertise of FundGrade or Lipper, as applicable, in fund analysis that alleviates any concern that references to them may be misleading and, therefore, contrary to paragraph 15.2(1)(a) of NI 81-102.

Decision

The principal regulator is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the principal regulator to make the decision.

The decision of the principal regulator under the Legislation is that the Exemption Sought is granted to permit the FundGrade A+ Awards, FundGrade Ratings, Lipper Awards, and Lipper Leaders Ratings to be referenced in sales communications relating to a Fund provided that:

1. the sales communication that refers to the FunGrade A+ Awards, FundGrade Ratings, Lipper Awards or Lipper Leaders Ratings complies with Part 15 of NI 81-102, other than as set out herein, and contains the following disclosure in at least 10 point type:

(a) the name of the category for which the Fund has received the award or rating;

(b) the number of mutual funds in the category for the applicable period;

(c) the name of the ranking entity, i.e., Fundata or Lipper;

(d) the length of period and the ending date, or, the first day of the period and the ending date on which the FundGrade A+ Award, FundGrade Rating, Lipper Award or Lipper Leaders Rating is based;

(e) a statement that FundGrade Ratings or Lipper Leaders Ratings are subject to change every month;

(f) in the case of a FundGrade A+ Award or Lipper Award, a brief overview of the FundGrade A+ Award or Lipper Award, as applicable;

(g) in the case of a FundGrade Rating (other than FundGrade Ratings referenced in connection with a FundGrade A+ Award) or a Lipper Leaders Rating (other than Lipper Leaders Ratings referenced in connection with a Lipper Award), a brief overview of the FundGrade Rating or Lipper Leaders Rating, as applicable;

(h) where Lipper Awards are referenced, the corresponding Lipper Leaders Rating that the Lipper Award is derived from is presented for each period for which standard performance data is required other than the one year and since inception periods;

(i) where a Lipper Leaders Rating is referenced, the Lipper Leaders Ratings are presented for each period for which standard performance data is required other than the one year and since inception periods;

(j) disclosure of the meaning of the FundGrade Ratings from A to E (e.g., rating of A indicates a fund is in the top 10% of its category) or Lipper Leaders Ratings from 1 to 5 (e.g., ranking of 5 indicates a fund is in the top 20% of its category), as applicable; and

(k) reference to Fundata’s website for greater detail on the FundGrade A+ Awards and the FundGrade Ratings or reference to Lipper’s website for greater detail on the Lipper Awards and Lipper Leaders Ratings, which includes the rating methodology prepared by Fundata or Lipper, as applicable;

2. the FundGrade A+ Awards and Lipper Awards being referenced must not have been awarded more than 365 days before the date of the sales communication; and

3. the FundGrade A+ Awards, FundGrade Ratings, Lipper Awards, and Lipper Leaders Ratings being referenced are calculated based on comparisons of performance of investment funds within a specified category established by CIFSC (or a successor to CIFSC).

“Neeti Varma”

Neeti Varma

Manager, Investment Funds and Structured Products Branch

Ontario Securities Commission

SEDAR Project #2998084

Application #2019/0599