Re: Justin Myers
ORB File No: 8479
Hearing held on: Monday, March 3, 2025
Place of Hearing: Providence Care Hospital, Kingston
Pursuant to: Section 672.81(1) of the Criminal Code
Before:
Alternate Chairperson: Mr. J. Hanbidge
Members: Mr. E. Siebenmorgen Dr. J. Watts Dr. J. Cheston Mr. R. Rainboth
Parties Appearing:
Accused: Justin Myers
Counsel: Mr. C. Carter
Person in charge of hospital: Representative Ms. T. Tom
Attorney-General of Ontario: Counsel: Ms. Jennifer Ferguson
AMENDED REASONS FOR DISPOSITION
(Dated May 5, 2025)
Please see underlined change to original reasons made May 5, 2025: The accused’s name has been corrected to read “Justin Myers” at the headers on pages 2 to 11.
Introduction
On January 29, 2024, Justin Myers was found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (“NCR”) on charges of assault, mischief under $5,000, and theft under $5,000, all contrary to the Criminal Code of Canada (“Criminal Code”).
Mr. Myers is currently subject to a Disposition of the Ontario Review Board (the “Board” or “ORB”) dated April 3, 2024, and amended by the Board’s Order, dated May 7, 2024, The Disposition ordered that Mr. Myers be detained at the Secure Forensic Unit of the Providence Care Hospital (“PCH”) in Kingston, with privileges up to and including entering the community of Kingston, within a 20 km radius of PCH, indirectly supervised.
On Monday, March 3, 2025, a panel of the Board convened for an in-person hearing at PCH to conduct a review of Mr. Myers’ Disposition. Mr. Myers was in attendance and was represented by legal counsel, Mr. Chad Carter.
The issues to be determined at the hearing were whether Mr. Myers continued to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public as defined in section 672.5401 of the Criminal Code, and if so, what was the necessary and appropriate Disposition which was also the least restrictive and least onerous taking into account the factors set out in section 672.54 of the Criminal Code.
Position of the Parties:
At the commencement of the hearing the parties were requested to provide their initial without prejudice positions with respect to the issues before the Board.
Ms. Tina Tom appeared for PCH. She advised of the Hospital position that Mr. Myers remains a significant threat to public safety, and if the Board so finds, the necessary and appropriate Disposition is a continuation of a Detention Order with the same conditions as were contained in last year’s Disposition.
Both Ms. Jennifer Ferguson, appearing for the Attorney-General, and Mr. Carter, appearing for Mr. Myers, either supported (the Crown) or were not opposed to (Mr. Myers’ counsel’s position) the Hospital’s position in respect of Mr. Myers’ continued significant threat to public safety, as well as the recommended Disposition.
Findings:
- For the Reasons that follow, the panel found that the threshold for significant threat is met, and that the necessary and appropriate Disposition is a continuation of the current Disposition without change, namely, a Detention Order within the Secure Forensic Unit of PCH, with the same conditions and privileges as were contained in last year’s Disposition.
Index Offence:
- The details giving rise to the index offence are extracted from the most recent Reasons for Disposition, dated May 7, 2024, as follows:
“The index offences arose from an incident at a convenience store in Brockville at approximately 8:30 p.m. on July 9, 2023. The factual background is outlined in the Transcript of the Reasons for Judgment dated January 29, 2024 (at pages 4-6) and is summarized as follows. Mr. Myers walked quickly towards the clerk of the store with a piece of paper in his hand with a formula on it. He was making comments about the Russians trying to take over and a war, that people were being killed, and that he needed to talk to a higher political power. Mr. Myers was using profanity and speaking in a high-pitched voice. The clerk was very confused and said he could not help Mr. Myers. Mr. Myers then picked up cans of Red Bull and threw them in the direction of the clerk. The computer screen near the clerk was damaged and no longer operable. Mr. Myers then opened cans of Red Bull and started drinking. The clerk tried to calm Mr. Myers down and Mr. Myers started to advance towards him. The clerk told Mr. Myers that he was going to call the police, and Mr. Myers continued to advance. The clerk was afraid and did not know if Mr. Myers had any weapons. Mr. Myers raised his hand toward the clerk and told him to shake it. Mr. Myers then turned away, picked up a lighter, and left the store. There was no physical contact when Mr. Myers advanced upon the clerk, but the clerk was very clear that he felt threatened when this was happening. Mr. Myers went out into the parking lot and was yelling and flailing his arms. He was observed by police to be screaming at a woman who was running to her van. Mr. Myers complied with police but continued to yell about Russia, higher powers, and engineering, such that he was difficult to communicate with.”
Current Diagnosis:
- Mr. Myers’ current diagnoses are Schizoaffective disorder (bipolar type), as well as substance use disorders (alcohol and cannabis).
Background:
The panel received and entered as exhibits at the hearing an Assessment Report, dated December 21, 2023, the Hospital Report, dated January 28, 2025, as well as a Progress Note, Psychology, dated February 27, 2025. These documents together provide a considerable amount of information concerning Mr. Myers, his personal history, his criminal and mental health histories, details of the index offence, and the fact that Mr. Myers had been previously subject to the jurisdiction of the ORB, from January 2017 to January 2023, with respect to charges of assault and utter threat to cause death or bodily harm. He received an absolute discharge in January 2023. As these documents were made an Exhibit in this hearing it is not necessary to reproduce all of the information contained in them in these Reasons, except as highlighted hereafter.
Briefly, Mr. Myers was 39 years old at the time of the hearing. He grew up with his mother and half-sister, and did not keep close contact with his biological father after his parents divorced. Mr. Myers graduated from high school without difficulty and had friendships during that time. He attended McMaster University’s Engineering program for a time but left these studies when he claimed that his Facebook account had been “hacked” with posts questioning his sexual orientation. The Hospital Report stated that Mr. Myers was currently enrolled in an Applied Mathematics program through Athabasca University.
Mr. Myers had been married for approximately one year (around 2010) and also had a son. He is estranged from his ex-partner and his son. There was also mention made that Mr. Myers having lived and worked in Russia and having a daughter there.
Mr. Myers had several short-term employments at a fast-food restaurant, a hardware store, a motorcycle shop, and in construction. Mr. Myers reported that he had been fired from some jobs for “not having the same personality as he was mixing alcohol and prescription pills” and for “withdrawing from medication.” Mr. Myers reported that he received compensation through the Canada Pension Plan Disability Program. He may also be supported by ODSP.
Prior to the index offences Mr. Myers had been living in a subsidized apartment in Brockville, but he had lost the apartment due to non-payment of rent and incarceration.
Mr. Myers became an NCR accused for the second time a year ago. The panel was provided with (and made the following exhibits at the hearing) copies of the Assessment Report (concerning Mr. Myers’ NCR finding for the current index offences) authored by Dr. Al-Humoud, dated December 21, 2023, as well as the Board’s Reasons for Disposition, dated February 21, 2023, following Mr. Myers’ previous Absolute Discharge Disposition ordered in January 2023.
At page 5 of the Board’s 2023 Reasons for Disposition the Board concluded as follows:
“21. Having heard and considered all of the evidence and the submission from the parties, the Board found that there was no evidence at the hearing to support a finding of significant threat to the safety of the public. Although Dr. Adiele in his evidence raised concerns with respect to the likelihood that Mr. Myers would not continue with his injectable medication if granted an absolute discharge, this does not align with his compliance over a significant period of time at the Brockville hospital.
There was evidence of Mr. Myers’ ongoing beliefs that he has been misdiagnosed, and that the dosage of his medications was too great. However, he has dialogued with his caregivers and essentially conformed with their advice. Although Mr. Myers, by his own admission, has used alcohol and cannabis on occasion, there was no evidence at the hearing that such use has resulted in any misbehaviour or harm to others. Mr. Myers’ criminal record is dated and did not result in serious physical harm to anyone. For approximately six years there has been no evidence of any aggressive or violent behaviour. It would appear from the evidence that Mr. Myers’ choice is to reside peacefully in his current residence in Brockville and it is likely from the evidence that he will continue to do so.
The evidence of Dr. Adiele at the hearing was to the effect that in his opinion Mr. Myers would likely not seek ongoing support from mental health givers or continue with his medications; however, this is not consistent with his past behaviour and is in the view of the Board speculative. Although in the best of all circumstances it would be preferable if Mr. Myers had expressed a willingness to engage with mental health providers in the community, this cannot impact the finding of the Board that he no longer represents a significant threat to public safety. Hopefully, he will continue to accept the support of the hospital and continue with his medications. Based on this finding the Board must grant an absolute discharge and so orders.”
The current Hospital Report confirms that having returned to hospital following a further NCR finding, Mr. Myers has current diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (bipolar type) and substance use disorders (alcohol and cannabis), although the severity of current substance use difficulties is unclear. Mr. Myers accrued the index charges of theft, mischief, and assault in the summer of 2023 following his Absolute Discharge Disposition, discontinuance of medication, and termination of services with his community treatment team.
Although Mr. Myers has a lengthy psychiatric history, he does not have a history of criminal conduct outside of his mental health difficulties. His aggressive behaviour has primarily been of verbal threats in the context of disorganized behaviour, positive symptoms of psychosis, and thought disorder. Physical violence involving intentional contact appears limited to his 2016 assault (punching the victim in the face and threatening to strike the victim with a hockey stick), in respect of which he was found NCR in 2017.
The key predisposing factor for Mr. Myers’ aggression is his schizoaffective disorder. While substance use could lead to relapse in mental illness, disinhibited behaviour, or destabilize prosocial controls, it appears that it is primarily Mr. Myers’ psychosis that had directly led to aggression in the past.
The Hospital Report notes this appeared to have occurred both in the context of psychosis when Mr. Myers experienced low mood (e.g., 2016 offences), and psychosis with elevated mood (e.g., 2023 offences). In the former mental state, Mr. Myers experienced paranoia, preoccupation with redemption and punishment, as well as thought broadcasting and insertion. The Hospital Report adds that Mr. Myers apparently kept a weight of some sort with him for protection when in such a mental state. In contrast, when experiencing a more elevated mood, Mr. Myers has more recently become preoccupied with pursuing his interests in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, with him acquiring a number of books for self-study or pursuing higher education in this regard. Mr. Myers becomes frustrated when thwarted in his pursuit of these goals.
In either mental state, Mr. Myers becomes preoccupied with his thoughts, and his problem-solving abilities become impaired, leading to aggressive behaviour.
The Hospital Report adds that, in full manic relapse, the problem becomes that Mr. Myers becomes dangerous and can exhibit violent behaviour towards others as his history has demonstrated. In this regard, Dr. Chan, Mr. Myers current treating psychiatrist at the hospital, as well as other members of Mr. Myers’ treatment team have been repeatedly threatened by Mr. Myers. As well, Mr. Myers has wanted Dr. Chan to be terminated as his treating physician.
Mr. Myers has been found incapable to consent to treatment with antipsychotic medication, despite Mr. Myers’ repeated unsuccessful attempts to overturn this determination at Consent and Capacity Board hearings. He is currently being treated with injectable Clopixol.
Mr. Myers detests such treatment claiming it takes away his manic edge of creative thinking and ability to focus on physic studies, especially nuclear physics. Therefore, Mr. Myers reacts strongly against anything that he perceives as interfering with this goal Mr. Myers reacts against strongly, even with vociferous self-destructive thoughts. This would usually occur a few days after his injection when he would complain of feeling slightly sedated and dulled in his thinking. He then becomes intensely dysphoric and voices suicidal intent, initiating the observation suite at the hospital, mostly at his own request. He has also requested MAiD as soon as it becomes available at law.
The Hospital Report notes that, on the hospital unit where Mr. Myers is situated, he has been managed for the majority of the past year in the high-intensity room which is a single room with adjoining bathroom. He has been managed with various levels of restrictions depending on his clinical mental state. As well, hospital staff have modified the number of furnishings or articles (including removal of linens used for self-asphyxiation) depending on Mr. Myers’ emotional state and voiced suicidal or self-destructive thoughts. Only since substitute consent was implemented has Mr. Myers accepted pharmacological treatment.
Mr. Myers’ insight into his mental health diagnosis is considered impaired as he waffles on his psychotic diagnosis, as well as the need for treatment with the use of antipsychotic medication. Mr. Myers has rejected any oral medication trial of mood stabilizers. Even attempts to try less sedating antipsychotic medication have resulted in his refusal. Mr. Myers can only be medicated with injectable medication which greatly limits the options.
To his credit, Mr. Myers has been quite involved with Behaviour Therapy over the duration of the past year, attending an Exceptional Behaviour Safety Risk Management plan for the entire year.
The Hospital Report details the various risk factors applicable to Mr. Myers. These include prior acts of violence, primarily of a verbal nature, his social isolation, lack of steady employment or current housing, his use of alcohol and cannabis (i.e. see further details in the next paragraph), his long-standing psychiatric history, his recent discontinuance of his prescribed medication regimen and follow-up treatment while living in the community, his denial of his current diagnoses, including his denial of experiencing elevated mood and grandiose delusional beliefs, as well as formal thought disorder over the past year, and being very reactive to frustration when unwell, such that when routines or expectations are not met, he becomes fixated on and upset with his grievances.
While living in the community in 2002, Mr. Myers used alcohol and cannabis despite prohibitions on his ORB Disposition and was observed to be intoxicated on one occasion. From January to July 2023, following his Absolute Discharge Disposition, Mr. Myers was observed to have used alcohol on at least one occasion associated with police contact.
An excerpt from the most recent prepared Progress Note – Psychology, dated February 27, 2025, authored by Dr. Douglas, Clinical & Forensic Psychologist at PCH, notes:
“Although he has a lengthy psychiatric history, Mr. Myers does not have a history of criminal conduct outside of his mental health difficulties. His aggressive behaviour has primarily been of verbal threats in the context of disorganized behaviour, positive symptoms of psychosis, and thought disorder. Physical violence involving intentional contact appears limited to his 2016 assault (moderate severity of violence).
As noted in the 2024 risk assessment, the key predisposing factor for Mr. Myers’ aggression is his schizoaffective disorder. While substance use could lead to relapse in mental illness, disinhibit behaviour, or destabilize prosocial controls, it appears that it is primarily Mr. Myers’ psychosis that has directly led to aggression in the past. This appears to have occurred both in the context of psychosis with low mood (e.g., 2016v offence), and psychosis with elevated mood (e.g., 2023 offence).
In an inpatient setting, staff members remain the most likely targets of aggression (primarily verbal threats). Triggers appear to include frustration related to goal directed behaviour being perceived as thwarted (reactive aggression), and as an intentional tactic to get (perceived) unmet needs addressed (i.e., instrumental, ineffective problem solving). Dysphoric mood and hopelessness are also triggers for both threats of harm to others and to self. Mr. Myers’ mood shifts rapidly in response to both internal (e.g., thoughts) and external (e.g., interactions) factors.
Mr. Myers appeared to have limited awareness of the rapid fluctuations of his suicidal thoughts and what causes changes in the intensity of his ideation and urges. It is possible that Mr. Myers engages in suicidal thinking as a means to regulate the distress associated with experiencing and anticipating stressors, as it provides a perception of escape.”
- Given all of these circumstances, both the Hospital Report and Progress Note state that at present Mr. Myers presents with a moderate to high risk for aggression in the absence of a supervisory framework. Mr. Myers, therefore, remains a significant risk to the safety of the public, given the nature of his struggles with mental illness and his historical desire to reject the effective path of antipsychotic treatment.
Oral Testimony at the Hearing:
The Hospital’s evidence was presented through the oral testimony of Dr. Michael Chan to supplement the evidence contained in the Hospital Report and the other documentation filed as exhibits at the hearing. Dr. Chan, as Mr. Myers’ current treating psychiatrist at PCH, testified that he was the author the current Hospital Report and adopted its contents, including his opinion, as noted at page 17 of the Report, stating that Mr. Myers remains a significant risk to the safety of others.
Dr. Chan testified that Mr. Myers is one of the rare persons who has previously been and is currently subject to the jurisdiction of the ORB for a second time. Mr. Myers previously was situated at the Brockville mental health facility from which he received an Absolute Discharge Disposition from the Board. Not long after his discharge, Mr. Myers stopped taking his prescribed antipsychotic medication regimen and began using substances, leading to the commission of the current index offences.
Dr. Chan added that during Mr. Myers’ presence at the Brockville facility he fought with the treatment team concerning his needed medication regimen and behaves in a similar fashion toward Dr. Chan and the treatment team during the current admission. According to Dr. Chan, Mr. Myers detests being prescribed Clopixol, an antipsychotic medication, as he claimed it blunted his thinking (especially in the manic stage of his decompensated mental health state), caused terrible side effects, including causing him to experience a dysphoric mood and hopelessness leading to suicidal thoughts, and (without testing) affected his sexual functioning by reducing his testosterone level.
In response, Dr. Chan had tried to try to obtain a better medication solution in order to reduce Mr. Myers’ claims of side effects. However, Dr. Chan testified that Mr. Myers has struggled with both Dr. Chan and the treatment team this past year. As examples, Dr. Chan indicated that he tried to prescribe different medication, including orally administered ones, but Mr. Myers refused to accept them. He apparently is only receptive to receiving long-acting injectable (“LAI”) medication.
Dr. Chan further testified that, until recently, Mr. Myers became rebellious with Dr. Chan, leading to Mr. Myers being restricted and confined to a private bedroom and bathroom unit at PCH. During this time, Dr. Chan noted that Mr. Myers seriously attempted to hang himself using bed linens.
However, Dr. Chan testified that since last Tuesday, February 25, 2025, following a further change in Mr. Myers’ antipsychotic medication, using LAI Invega Sustenna, Mr. Myers appears happy with the change and advised Dr. Chan earlier on the day of the hearing that the new medication appeared to take the edge off his grandiosity. Dr. Chan was hopeful that Mr. Myers’ recovery would improve with this recent medication adjustment. According to Dr. Chan, it will take 2 to 3 LAI cycles of administering Invega over a period of a couple of months, to determine whether there is any improvement in Mr. Myers’ mental health condition.
Dr. Chan noted that when Mr. Myers presents as floridly psychotic, he rejects his mental health diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, but presently Mr. Myers is doing better. While Dr. Chan previously saw Mr. Myers on a daily basis when he was staying in his high-intensity room, sessions have now been reduced to twice weekly.
Dr. Chan confirmed that Mr. Myers current terms of supervision, as noted in the current Disposition, accurately reflect Mr. Myers’ current privileges, with Mr. Myers primarily confined to his hospital unit. If he ever leaves the unit, which he has rarely done, he would always be accompanied by staff.
During the upcoming reporting period, Dr. Chan was hoping to see some stability in Mr. Myers’ mental state, a reduction in Mr. Myers’ list of medication side effect complaints, a reduction in Mr. Myers’ suicidal ideation, and the expectation that Dr. Chan and the treatment will be able to develop a working alliance with Mr. Myers.
Dr Chan noted that Mr. Myers is very fond of engineering, with Mr. Myers seeking for his own pleasure to undertake a self-study program in the nuclear physics specialty of that field. Dr. Chan added that, in pursuit of this goal, Mr. Myers had spent a considerable amount of money acquiring textbooks related to this field of study.
As for Mr. Myers having any ongoing family contact, Dr. Chan testified that Mr. Myers was currently estranged form his mother. According to Dr. Chan, Mr. Myers’ mother had declined to be his substitute decision-maker (“SDM”) for treatment incapacity purposes because Mr. Myers became angry with her. At present, Mr. Myers SDM for treatment concerns is the Public Guardian and Trustee.
Given Mr. Myers current unstable mental health condition, Dr. Chan testified that a Detention Order Disposition, with the same conditions and privileges as stated in last year’s Order is required as Mr. Myers is not able to live in the community.
In response to questioning by Mr. Carter, counsel for Mr. Myers, Dr. Chan testified that, following Mr. Myers previously granted Absolute Discharge Disposition, he stopped taking his numerous medications due to his claim of side effects.
In response to questions posed by some panel members, Dr. Chan testified that part of the plan for treatment for Mr. Myers will include formal psychological therapeutic interventions once Mr. Myers becomes mentally stable. Until then he continues to have ongoing discussions with his behavioural therapist.
Dr. Chan indicated that Mr. Myers is a very academically inclined person who has purportedly trained in the field of nuclear physics, with a special interest in nuclear power generation concerns. He apparently has made dialogue connection with a professor at McMaster University. He also wants to seek patents for some of his ideas in this field. Mr. Myers is also interested in offering his knowledge and expertise in nuclear power generation to Russian officials as he does not believe the Canadian authorities are receptive.
Dr. Chan was confident that for the upcoming review period Mr. Myers’ list of privileges, as stated in his current ORB Disposition, were the least restrictive to Mr. Myers, with the extent of community access being viewed as adequate. According to Dr. Chan, given Mr. Myers’ current mental health state and his need for treatment, a provision permitting Mr. Myers’ ability to experience community living was thought to be unrealistic at the present time.
Also, given Mr. Myers present circumstances, and the opinion that the provisions of the Mental Health Act were thought to be inadequate alone to manage his risk, a Conditional Discharge Disposition was not being recommended for Mr. Myers by the Hospital, Dr. Chan and the members of the treatment team. Given his current mental state and his history with the ORB, a Detention Order provides the necessary and essential risk management tools to oversee Mr. Myers’ care going forward.
Reference was made to paragraph 16 of last year’s ORB Reasons for Disposition which summarized the various contacts and encounters Mr. Myers had with the Brockville Police Service. Dr. Chan reiterated that, when Mr. Myers experiences a relapse of his mental illness, he becomes psychotic and, therefore becomes a significant risk to the safety of others. Dr. Chan noted that reference to Mr. Myers’ prior police involvement was the subject of Dr. Douglas’ prior risk assessment reports and should continue to be a factor in any future risk assessments.
Mr. Myers also chose to give oral testimony at the hearing by reading from a prepared written summary. The panel was appreciative of Mr. Myers’ comments. He confirmed that he had purchased and was in possession of approximately 50 books relating to his interest in nuclear physics and nuclear power generation. He planned to continue his studies in these fields in the upcoming year. He claimed that previously prescribed sedatives had compromised his ability to function. He believed that the recently prescribed alternative antipsychotic medication was helpful and seemed to cause less sedation, thereby making it better for him to succeed.
No further evidence was presented at the hearing by the parties.
Analysis and Necessary and Appropriate Disposition
The Board agrees with the joint position of the parties that Mr. Myers represents a significant threat to the safety of the public based on the evidence in the Hospital Report and the Psychology Progress Note, and from Dr. Chan. This is Mr. Myers’ second NCR finding. The first index offences involved an assault and threats to an off-duty police officer, and the current index offences involved psychological harm to a clerk in a convenience store. These were unprovoked attacks based on delusional beliefs. Further, Mr. Myers was unmedicated for a long period of time and is only now in the very early stages of readjusted medication treatment at PCH. Dr. Chan’s evidence was clear that Mr. Myers’ mental state is not at all stabilized and he still represents a significant threat to public safety. The Board accepts his opinion.
The Board also agrees with the joint position of the parties that the necessary and appropriate Disposition is a continuation of the current Disposition without changes. The Board agrees with the Hospital’s observations that, due to Mr. Myers’ diagnosed mental illnesses of Schizoaffective disorder (bipolar type), as well as substance use disorders (alcohol and cannabis), in the absence of the formal supervisory and support framework at PCH, Mr. Myers is at moderate to high risk for aggression. In full manic relapse, Mr. Myers becomes dangerous and can exhibit violent behaviour towards others as his history has demonstrated. A Detention Order provides essential risk management tools going forward.
Although not asserted by any of the parties, given the facts of this case, the Board also found that a Conditional Discharge would not be an appropriate Disposition for Mr. Myers at the present time given his current mental state, his history with the ORB, and the fact that he is not yet ready to live in the community. The Board also concludes that a Conditional Discharge Disposition would be inappropriate given the requirement to return Mr. Myers to hospital quickly if he became unwell and the inadequacy of the Mental Health Act of Ontario alone to manage his risk.
Given the recent adjustments to Mr. Myers’ medication regimen, coupled with his recent participation in and optimistic outlook toward his ongoing treatment, Mr. Myers’ progress is hopefully on a positive trajectory. The Board wishes Mr. Myers every success in the upcoming year.
In making this Disposition, the Board carefully considered the joint position of the parties, the evidence of Dr. Chan, and the contents of the Hospital Report and Psychology Progress Note, entered as exhibits at the hearing, and is satisfied that this determination is both necessary and appropriate. The Board reviewed the provisions of sections 672.54 and 672.5401 of the Criminal Code and carefully considered the need to protect the public from dangerous persons (with the public's safety being the Board's paramount consideration), Mr. Myers’ mental condition and his reintegration into society and other needs.
DATED this 5th day of May 2025, at the City of Toronto, in the Toronto Region.
Mr. John Hanbidge Alternate Chairperson
Office of the Registrar
Ontario Review Board