PAY EQUITY HEARINGS TRIBUNAL
0921-10-PE Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Applicant v. Canadian Office & Professional Employees Union, Local 96, Respondent.
BEFORE: Caroline Rowan, Vice-Chair, Paul LeMay and Pauline R. Seville, Members.
DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL: January 5, 2011
This application is currently scheduled for hearing on March 25, 2011 in Thunder Bay.
In the circumstances, the applicant is hereby directed to deliver to the respondent and file with the Tribunal no later than fifteen (15) days from the date of this decision submissions containing the following:
a. a statement of the issue that remains outstanding between the parties;
b. the applicant’s position in respect of this issue;
c. a statement of all facts that the applicant relies upon in support of its position;
d. a list of all witnesses that the applicant intends to call at the hearing;
e. a statement as to what each of the witnesses that the applicant intends to call will say at the hearing; and
f. a copy of all documents that the applicant relies upon in support of its position.
- The respondent is hereby directed to deliver to the applicant and file with the Tribunal no later than ten (10) days from the date on which it receives the applicant's submissions as directed in the foregoing paragraph, the following:
a statement of the issue that remains outstanding between the parties;
the respondent's position in respect of this issue;
a statement as to which of the facts asserted by the applicant the respondent agrees with and which of the facts it does not agree with;
a statement of all facts that the respondent relies upon in support of its position;
a list of all witnesses that the respondent intends to call at the hearing;
a statement as to what each of the witnesses that the respondent intends to call will say at the hearing; and
a copy of all documents that the respondent relies upon in support of its position.
- The applicant is hereby directed to deliver to the respondent and file with the Tribunal no later than five (5) days from the date on which it receives the respondent's submissions as directed in the foregoing paragraph its reply to the submissions of the respondent. Such reply must include a statement as to which of the facts asserted by the respondent the applicant agrees with and which of the facts it does not agree with.
Dated at Toronto this 5^th^ day of January, 2011.
“Caroline Rowan”
Caroline Rowan, Vice-Chair
“Paul LeMay”
Paul LeMay, Member
“Pauline R. Seville”
Pauline R. Seville, Member