CITATION: Middleton v. Direct Broadcast Satellite Communications Corp., 2023 ONSC 4785

DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 23-237-ML

DATE: 20240419

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – ONTARIO DIVISIONAL COURT

RE: JDM GROUP LTD. and JASON MIDDLETON Applicants (Moving Parties)

AND:

DIRECT BROADCAST SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS CORP., PRODUCERS PLANNING GROUP LTD., THE BENEFITS GROUP INC., THORNBRIDGE CAPITAL

GROUP INC. and MARK BER Respondents (Responding Parties)

AND RE:

DOUG MIDDLETON Applicant (Moving Party)

AND:

DIRECT BROADCAST SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS CORP., THE BENEFITS GROUP

INC. and MARK BER Respondents (Responding Parties)

AND RE:

DIRECT BROADCAST SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS CORP., THE PRODUCERS

GROUP LTD. and MARK BER Applicants (Responding Parties)

AND:

JDM GROUP LTD., PRODUCERS PLANNING GROUP INC., THE BENEFITS GROUP INC., THORNBRIDGE CAPITAL INC., JASON MIDDLETON AND DOUG MIDDLETON

Respondents (Moving Parties)

BEFORE: Sachs, Backhouse and Schabas JJ.

COUNSEL: Howard Borlack, Stephen Barbier and Ben Tustain for the Moving Parties

HEARD: in writing

ENDORSEMENT

[1] Having reviewed the material filed by the parties, the Court is of the view that no costs on the motion for leave to appeal is the appropriate order. The motion to vary the Order of August 25, 2023 is dismissed.

Released April 19, 2024

Sachs J.

Backhouse J.

Schabas J.