Paulin v. Pinder, 2020 ONSC 3312
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 026-20
DATE: 20200527
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
Backhouse, Penny, Kristjanson, JJ.
BETWEEN:
BARRY PAULIN and WAYNE BIGGAR
Applicants
– and –
JACK PINDER, VICTOR DUSIK and INNOTECH SAFETY SOLUTIONS INC.
Respondents
Counsel:
Douglas Spiller, Counsel for Applicants
Stephen Barbier and Ben Tustain, Counsel for the Respondents
ORDER
[1] The motion for leave to appeal the orders of Perell, J. dated March 29, 2019 and June 5, 2019 is dismissed with costs to the respondents fixed in the amount of $11,000($6000 for the costs ordered in the cause for the motion to extend time to seek leave to appeal as ordered by Justice Corbett on January 31, 2020 and $5000 for the costs of the leave to appeal motion.)
Backhouse J.
I agree _______________________________ Penny J.
I agree _______________________________ Kristjanson J.
Released: May 27, 2020
Paulin v. Pinder, 2020 ONSC Number 3312
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 026-20
DATE: 20200527
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
BETWEEN:
BARRY PAULIN and WAYNE BIGGAR
Applicants
– and –
JACK PINDER, VICTOR DUSIK and INNOTECH SAFETY SOLUTIONS INC.
Respondent
Order
Backhouse, Penny, Kristjanson JJ.
Released: May 27, 2020