DATE: 20040723
DOCKET: C40961
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
RE:
LEO PERCIASEPE (Plaintiff/Respondent) – and – ROY FRANCIS SMITH, JANET ANDERSON SMITH, 120308 ONTARIO LIMITED, SUNLAND ENTERPRISES INC., 930545 ONTARIO LIMITED c.o.b. as FLORIDA ATTRACTION SALES and RUEBEN PARNES (Defendants/ Appellants)
BEFORE:
CATZMAN, GILLESE and LANG JJ.A.
COUNSEL:
Robert J. van Kessell and Kenneth R. Shugart
for the appellant Janet Anderson Smith
Michael R. Kestenberg and Steven Bellissimo
for the respondent
HEARD AND ENDORSED:
July 22, 2004
On appeal from the judgment of Justice Margaret P. Eberhard of the Superior Court of Justice dated October 21, 2003.
A P P E A L B O O K E N D O R S E M E N T
[1] On the state of the record before the court, this appeal must be dismissed.
[2] On a plain reading of rule 20.01(1), Eberhard J. was entitled to entertain the motion for judgment that was before her. The appellant put forward no evidence to contradict the clear allegations of fraud and fraudulent misrepresentation which, by rule 19.02(1)(a), she was deemed to have admitted, and Eberhard J. did not err in reaching the conclusion that the appellant’s debt arose from fraud and thus survived her discharge from bankruptcy.
[3] We see no merit in the other grounds of appeal that were raised on behalf of the appellant.
[4] Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs fixed in the sum of $7,500, plus disbursements and G.S.T.

