March 21, 2000

Cates v. Salamon, 2000 ONCA 26975

Case Summary

The appellant challenged the trial judgment. The Court of Appeal held that it was not persuaded the judgment under appeal was erroneous and agreed with the trial judge's full and careful reasons. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court of Appeal for Ontario

Cates v. Salamon

Date: 2000-03-21

Robert Sutherland (Watkins Law Firm), for the appellant;

Counsel for the defendants not disclosed.

(Court File No. C30394)

[1] By the Court: Despite the submissions of the appellant, we are not persuaded that the judgment in appeal is in error. The trial judge gave full and careful reasons for arriving at his conclusions and we agree with them.

[2] The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Counsel

Applicant
RRobert Sutherland (Watkins Law Firm)
Respondent
C

Counsel not disclosed

Parties

Catesapplicant
Salamonrespondent

Areas of Law

Civil Litigation - Defendant Civil Litigation - Plaintiff

Issues

Whether the trial judgment was in error→ dismissed — no error found
Costs of the appeal→ awarded to the respondent