ISSUE DATE: January 27, 2025 CASE NO.: OLT-23-000697
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant/Appellant: SLH Lakeshore Inc.
Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment Application – failure to make a decision
Description: To permit a mixed-use development of two residential towers of 38 and 43 storeys containing 899 dwelling units above a 4-storey mixed-use podium
Reference Number: 22 204512 STE 14 OZ
Municipality: City of Toronto
Property Address: 685 Lake Shore Boulevard East
OLT Case No.: OLT-23-000697
OLT Lead Case No.: OLT-23-000697
OLT Case Name: SLH Lakeshore Inc. v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 41(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant(s)/Appellant(s): SLH Lakeshore Inc.
Subject: Site Plan Control Application – failure to approve
Description: To permit a mixed-use development of two residential towers of 38 and 43 storeys containing 899 dwelling units above a 4-storey mixed-use podium
Reference Number: 22 204511 STE 14 SA
Municipality: City of Toronto
Property Address: 685 Lake Shore Boulevard East
OLT Case No.: OLT-23-000698
OLT Lead Case No.: OLT-23-000697
OLT Case Name: SLH Lakeshore Inc. v. Toronto (City)
BEFORE:
M.A. SILLS ) Friday, the 24th day of VICE-CHAIR ) ) January 2025
THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS that the Procedural Order, as agreed to between the Parties and attached hereto as Attachment “A”, shall replace the previously issued Procedural Order, as amended, and be in force and effect for the purposes of governing the procedures leading up and including the hearing, which is now scheduled to commence on Monday, May 26, 2025 at 10:00 a.m.
“Euken Lui”
EUKEN LUI
ACTING REGISTRAR
Ontario Land Tribunal
Website: olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248
The Conservation Review Board, the Environmental Review Tribunal, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and the Mining and Lands Tribunal are amalgamated and continued as the Ontario Land Tribunal (“Tribunal”). Any reference to the preceding tribunals or the former Ontario Municipal Board is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal.
ATTACHMENT “A”
Procedural Order
The Tribunal may vary or add to the directions in this procedural order at any time by an oral ruling or by another written order, either on the parties’ request or its own motion.
The video hearing will begin on Monday May 26, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. at the following link: https://meet.goto.com/677087597 (Access Code: 677-087-597)
The parties’ initial estimation for the length of the hearing is 8 days. The parties are expected to cooperate to reduce the length of the hearing by eliminating redundant evidence and attempting to reach settlements on issues where possible.
The parties and participants identified at the case management conference are set out in
Attachment 1.
The issues are set out in the Issues List attached as Attachment 2. There will be no changes to this list unless the Tribunal permits, and a party who asks for changes may have costs awarded against it.
The order of evidence shall be as set out in Attachment 3 to this Order. The Tribunal may limit the amount of time allocated for opening statements, evidence in chief (including the qualification of witnesses), cross-examination, evidence in reply and final argument. The length of written argument, if any, may be limited either on the parties’ consent, subject to the Tribunal’s approval, or by Order of the Tribunal.
The meaning of the terms used in this Procedural Order are identified in Attachment 4.
Any person intending to participate in the hearing should provide a mailing address, email address and a telephone number to the Tribunal as soon as possible – ideally before the case management conference. Any person who will be retaining a representative should advise the other parties and the Tribunal of the representative’s name, address, email address and the phone number as soon as possible.
Any person who intends to participate in the hearing, including parties, counsel and witnesses, is expected to review the Tribunal’s Video Hearing Guide, available on the Tribunal’s website.
Requirements Before the Hearing
If the Applicant/Appellant intends to seek approval of a revised version of its proposal at the hearing, the Applicant/Appellant shall provide details of the revised proposal, including revised plans and drawings, proposed instruments, updated supporting documents and reports to the other parties on or before Friday, January 31, 2025, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. If the Applicant/Appellant provides a revised proposal, the parties shall have the right to reasonably revise the issues list to address the revision(s). If the Applicant/Appellant provides a revised proposal after the last date for revised plans above without the consent of the parties, it may be grounds for a request to adjourn the hearing.
A party who intends to call witnesses, whether by summons or not, shall provide to the Tribunal and the other parties a list of the witnesses and the order in which they will be called. This list must be delivered on or before Monday, March 3, 2025 and in accordance with paragraph 24 below. A party who intends to call an expert witness must include a copy of the witness’ Curriculum Vitae and the area of expertise in which the witness is prepared to be qualified. Any challenges to the witness, including qualifications of a witness to give opinion evidence in the area of expertise proposed shall be made by motion in accordance with the Tribunal’s Rules and notice of same must be served on the other parties on or before Wednesday, March 12, 2025.
Expert witnesses in the same field shall have a meeting on or before Thursday, March 27, 2025 and use best efforts to try to resolve or reduce the issues for the hearing. Following the experts’ meeting the parties must prepare and file a Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues with the OLT case coordinator on or before Monday, April 7, 2025.
An expert witness shall prepare an expert witness statement, which shall list any reports prepared by the expert, or any other reports or documents to be relied on at the hearing. Copies of this must be provided as in paragraph 15 below. Instead of a witness statement, the expert may file his or her entire report if it contains the required information. If this is not done, the Tribunal may refuse to hear the expert’s testimony.
Expert witnesses who are under summons but not paid to produce a report do not have to file an expert witness statement; but the party calling them must file a brief outline of the expert’s evidence as in paragraph 15 below. A party who intends to call a witness who is not an expert must file a brief outline of the witness’ evidence, as in paragraph 15 below.
On or before Tuesday, April 22, 2025, the parties shall provide copies of their witness and expert witness statements to the other parties and to the OLT case coordinator and in accordance with paragraph 24 below.
On or before Tuesday, April 22, 2025, a participant shall provide copies of their written participant statement to the other parties and to the OLT case coordinator in accordance with paragraph 24 below. A participant cannot present oral submissions at the hearing on the content of their written statement, unless ordered by the Tribunal.
On or before Thursday, May 1, 2025, the parties may provide to all other parties and the OLT case coordinator a written response to any written evidence in accordance with paragraph 24 below.
On or before Monday, May 12, 2025, the parties shall confirm with the Tribunal if all the reserved hearing dates are still required.
On or before Monday, May 12, 2025, the parties shall provide copies of their visual evidence to all of the other parties in accordance with paragraph 24 below. If a model will be used, all parties must have a reasonable opportunity to view it before the hearing.
The parties shall cooperate to prepare a joint document book which shall be shared with the OLT case coordinator on or before Monday, May 12, 2025.
A person wishing to change written evidence, including witness statements, must make a written motion to the Tribunal. See Rule 10 of the Tribunal’s Rules with respect to Motions, which requires that the moving party provide copies of the motion to all other parties 15 days before the Tribunal hears the motion.
A party who provides written evidence of a witness to the other parties must have the witness attend the hearing to give oral evidence, unless the party notifies the Tribunal at least 7 days before the hearing that the written evidence is not part of their record.
The parties shall prepare and file a preliminary hearing plan with the Tribunal on or before Friday, May 16, 2025 with a proposed schedule for the hearing that identifies, as a minimum, the parties participating in the hearing, the preliminary matters (if any to be addressed), the anticipated order of evidence, the date each witness is expected to attend, the anticipated length of time for evidence to be presented by each witness in chief, cross- examination and re-examination (if any) and the expected length of time for final submissions. The parties are expected to ensure that the hearing proceeds in an efficient manner and in accordance with the hearing plan. The Tribunal may, at its discretion, change or alter the hearing plan at any time in the course of the hearing.
All filings shall be submitted electronically unless otherwise directed. Electronic copies may be filed by email, an electronic file sharing service for documents that exceed 10MB in size, or as otherwise directed by the Tribunal. The delivery of documents by email shall be governed by the Rule 7.
No adjournments or delays will be granted before or during the hearing except for serious hardship or illness. The Tribunal’s Rule 17 applies to such requests.
This Member is not seized.
So orders the Tribunal.
SUMMARY OF DATES
DATE
EVENT
Friday, January 31, 2025 (115 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline for Applicant/Appellant to provide Revised Proposal
Monday, March 3, 2025 (84 days before commencement of hearing)
Exchange List of Proposed Witnesses
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 (75 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline to file Motion to Challenge Witness Qualification
Thursday, March 27, 2025 (60 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline for Expert Witness Meeting
Monday, April 7, 2025 (49 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline for Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues
Tuesday, April 22, 2025 (34 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline for Witness Statements; Deadline for Expert Witness Statements; and Deadline for Participant Statements
Thursday, May 1, 2025 (25 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline for Reply Witness Statements (if any); and Deadline for Reply Expert Witness Statements (if any)
Monday, May 12, 2025 (14 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline for advising the Tribunal if all the reserved hearing dates are required; Deadline for Visual Evidence; and Deadline for Joint Document Book
Friday, May 16, 2025 (10 days before commencement of hearing)
Deadline for Preliminary Hearing Plan
Monday, May 26, 2025 – Wednesday, June 4, 2025
Commencement of Hearing (8 days)
ATTACHMENT 1
LIST OF PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
Parties
Counsel/Representative
SLH Lakeshore Inc.
Aird & Berlis LLP Brookfield Place 181 Bay Street, Suite 1800 Toronto, ON M5J 2T9 Eileen Costello Email: ecostello@airdberlis.com Tel: 416.865.4740 Jasmine C.M. Fraser Email: jcmfraser@airdberlis.com Tel: 647.426.2316
City of Toronto
City of Toronto Metro Hall 55 John Street, 26th Floor Toronto, ON M5V 3C6 Sarah O’Connor Email: Sarah.OConnor@toronto.ca Tel: 416.397.5378 Lauren Pinder Email: lauren.pinder@toronto.ca Tel: 416.392.0797
115 Saulter South LP
Goodmans LLP Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street, Suite 3400 Toronto, ON M5H 2S7 Anne Benedetti Email: abenedetti@goodmans.ca Tel: 416.597.5929 Max Laskin Email: mlaskin@goodmans.ca Tel: 416.849.6938
1956565 Ontario Inc.
Goodmans LLP Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street, Suite 3400 Toronto, ON M5H 2S7 David Bronskill Email: dbronskill@goodmans.ca Tel: 416.597.4299 Joe Hoffman Email: jhoffman@goodmans.ca Tel: 416.597.5168
Participants
Hydro One Networks Inc. (Email: raman.dhillon@hydroone.com)
Tepfam Holdings Inc. (Email: jordanteperman@rogers.com)
ATTACHMENT 2 ISSUES LIST
NOTE: The identification of an issue on the Issues List does not constitute an acknowledgement by the Tribunal or any Party that the issue is either relevant or appropriate. The identification of an issue on this list by a Party indicates that Party’s intent to lead evidence or argue that the issue is relevant to the proceeding, for the purpose of fairly identifying to the other Parties the case they need to meet and shall not be construed as the Tribunal having jurisdiction over such matters in each circumstance. Accordingly, no Party shall advance an issue not identified on the Issues List without leave of the Tribunal.
ISSUES OF 115 SAULTER SOUTH LP
Does the application have appropriate regard to matters of Provincial interest in Section 2 of the Planning Act, including subsections (f), (h), , (n) and (r)?
Is the application consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024), including sections 2.2, 2.3.1.1 – 2.3.1.3, 2.4, 3.2.1 and 6.2.1?
Does the application conform with the City of Toronto Official Plan, including policies 2.2.4, 2.2.5, and sections 2.2.1 (Downtown: The Heart of Toronto), 3.1.1 (Public Realm), 3.1.3 and 3.1.4 (Built Form), and 4.7 (Regeneration Areas)?
Does the application conform with the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, including policies P10, P11, P32 and section 2.1, and the Port Lands Area Specific Policy, including policies 2.1.7, 3.6, 3.10, 9.1, 9.2, 9.5, 9.7, 9.8, 9.12, 9.15, 10.7.3, 14.6.1, 14.6.2, and 15.3, 15.4?
Does the application have appropriate regard for, and appropriately implement, the Port Lands Planning Framework?
Does the southern tower have appropriate regard for, and appropriately implement, Section 3.2.3 (Separation Distances) of the Tall Building Design Guidelines?
Is approval of the proposed zoning amendments premature prior to the completion of a Precinct Plan, Precinct Implementation Strategy or other precinct planning exercise for the McCleary District?
Does the proposed development appropriately take into account the planned context and potential development of the McCleary District?
Does the configuration, location and massing of the proposed southern tower provide for an appropriate relationship to the lands located immediately to the south?
Is the location, alignment and design of the proposed east-west public right-of-way appropriate and does it represent good planning?
Does the proposed development – specifically the proposed southern tower and the location, alignment and design of the proposed east-west public right-of-way – result in unacceptable impacts to, or inappropriately limit the potential future redevelopment of, the lands located immediately to the south?
Is Section 3 of the City Council decision made November 13, 2024 in Item 2024.CC23.12 appropriate as it relates to the future East-West street?
If approved by the Tribunal, what are appropriate pre-conditions to the issuance of a final order? Is the form and content of the proposed zoning by-law amendment appropriate?
ATTACHMENT 3 ORDER OF EVIDENCE
SLH Lakeshore Inc.
115 Saulter South LP
Reply by SLH Lakeshore Inc. (if any)
ATTACHMENT 4
PURPOSE OF THE PROCEDURAL ORDER
Case management conferences are scheduled by the Tribunal to organize the hearing. This sample procedural order is provided to identify who may participate in the hearing, the issues in dispute, and the matters that are required to be carried out before the hearing. The attachment to this sample procedural order explains the meaning of a number of terms in the sample procedural order, such as a party or a participant.
The Tribunal recommends that the appellant, municipality, the applicant (if applicable), or those who wish to seek party status in this proceeding, meet, remotely if necessary, to discuss this sample procedural order before the date of the case management conference and try to identify the issues and process they want the Tribunal to order following the conference. The Tribunal will hear submissions on the content of this sample procedural order at the case management conference and issue a procedural order at a later date.
If you are not represented by a lawyer, you should prepare by reviewing the Tribunal’s Video Hearings Guide, and the Tribunal’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (“Rules”), particularly Rule 20, which are available on the Tribunal’s website.
Meaning of terms used in the Procedural Order:
A party is an individual or corporation permitted by the Tribunal to participate fully in the hearing by receiving copies of written evidence, presenting witnesses, cross-examining the witnesses of the other parties, and making submissions on all of the evidence. An unincorporated group cannot be a party and it must appoint one person to speak for it, and that person must accept the other responsibilities of a party as set out in the Order. Parties do not have to be represented by a lawyer and may have an agent speak for them. The agent must have written authorization from the party.
NOTE that a person who wishes to become a party before or at the hearing, and who did not request this at the case management conference (CMC), must ask the Tribunal to permit this.
A participant is an individual or corporation, whether represented by a lawyer or not, who may make a written submission to the Tribunal. A participant cannot make an oral submission to the Tribunal or present oral evidence (testify in-person) at the hearing (only a party may do so). Section 17 of the Ontario Land Tribunal Act states that a person who is not a party to a proceeding may only make a submission to the Tribunal in writing. The Tribunal may direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions from the Tribunal on the content of their written submission, should that be found necessary by the Tribunal. A participant may also be asked questions by the parties should the Tribunal direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions on the content of their written submission.
A participant must be identified and be accorded participant status by the Tribunal at the CMC. A participant will not receive notice of conference calls on procedural issues that may be scheduled prior to the hearing, nor receive notice of mediation. A participant cannot ask for costs, or review of a decision, as a participant does not have the rights of a party to make such requests of the Tribunal.
Written evidence includes all written material, reports, studies, documents, letters and witness statements which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing. These must have pages numbered consecutively throughout the entire document, even if there are tabs or dividers in the material.
Visual evidence includes photographs, maps, videos, models, and overlays which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing.
A witness statement is a short written outline of the person’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a list of the issues which he or she will discuss ; and a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing.
An expert witness statement should include his or her (1) name and address, (2) qualifications,
(3) a list of the issues he or she will address, (4) the witness’ opinions on those issues and the complete reasons supporting their opinions and conclusions and (5) a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing. An expert witness statement must be accompanied by an acknowledgement of expert’s duty.
A participant statement is a short written outline of the person’s or group’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a statement of the participant’s position on the appeal; a list of the issues which the participant wishes to address and the submissions of the participant on those issues; and a list of reports or materials, if any, which the participant wishes to refer to in their statement.
Additional Information
A summons may compel the appearance of a person before the Tribunal who has not agreed to appear as a witness. A party must ask a Tribunal Member or the senior staff of the Tribunal to issue a summons through a request. (See Rule 13 on the summons procedure.) The request should indicate how the witness’ evidence is relevant to the hearing. If the Tribunal is not satisfied from the information provided in the request that the evidence is relevant, necessary or admissible, the party requesting the summons may provide a further request with more detail or bring a motion in accordance with the Rules.
The order of examination of witnesses is usually direct examination, cross-examination and re-examination in the following way:
direct examination by the party presenting the witness;
direct examination by any party of similar interest, in the manner determined by the Tribunal;
cross-examination by parties of opposite interest;
re-examination by the party presenting the witness; or
another order of examination mutually agreed among the parties or directed by the Tribunal.
62782796.2