Ontario Land Tribunal
Tribunal ontarien de l’aménagement
du territoire
ISSUE DATE:
August 11, 2025
CASE NO(S).:
OLT-25-000184
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended.
Applicant/Appellant
1212763 Ontario Limited and 1212765 Ontario Limited
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan – Failure to adopt the requested amendment
Description:
To facilitate the redevelopment of 1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street.
Reference Number:
19 211934 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street
Municipality/UT:
Toronto/Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Case Name:
1212765 Ontario Limited and 1212763 Ontario Limited v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended.
Subject:
Application to amend the Zoning By-law – Refusal or neglect to make a decision
Description:
To facilitate the redevelopment of 1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street.
Reference Number:
19 211943 STE 12 SA
Property Address:
1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street
Municipality/UT:
Toronto/Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000185
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Case Name:
1212765 Ontario Limited and 1212763 Ontario Limited v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 114(15) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 11, Sched. A.
Subject:
Failure to make a decision on the site plan application
Description:
To facilitate the redevelopment of 1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street.
Reference Number:
19 211934 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street
Municipality/UT:
Toronto/Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000186
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Case Name:
1212765 Ontario Limited and 1212763 Ontario Limited v. Toronto (City)
Heard:
July 29, 2025 by Telephone Conference
APPEARANCES:
Parties
Counsel
1212763 Ontario Limited and 1212765 Ontario Limited
Maggie Bassani
Anna Lu
City of Toronto
Derin Abimbola
MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY S. Dixon ON July 29, 2025 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL
INTRODUCTION
1This Decision and Order arises from the second Case Management Conference held regarding appeals by 1212763 Ontario Limited and 1212765 Ontario Limited (“Appellant”) pursuant to ss. 22(7) and 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (“Planning Act”), and s. 114(15) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 11, Schedule A., as amended (“Toronto Act”), concerning official plan amendment (“OPA”), zoning by-law amendment (“ZBA”), and site plan approval (“SPA”) applications (together, “Applications”) in the City of Toronto (“City”) for lands municipally known as 1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street (“Subject Lands”).
2The Applications were appealed to the Tribunal as a result of the City’s failure to make a decision within the statutory timeframes prescribed by the Planning Act and Toronto Act.
3The purpose of this CMC was to finalise a draft procedural order and issues list – both submitted to the Tribunal on consent of all Parties in advance of the CMC – and to schedule dates for a hearing on the merits.
ADJOURNMENT OF SITE PLAN APPEAL
4The Parties requested that the appeal pertaining to the SPA application (Tribunal Case No. OLT-24-000186) be adjourned sine die while the OPA and ZBA appeals advance.
5The request was granted and the Tribunal adjourned the appeal pertaining to s. 114(15) of the Toronto Act sine die.
DRAFT PROCEDURAL ORDER AND ISSUES LIST
6Following the CMC, the Parties submitted an updated draft Procedural Order and Issues List to the Tribunal.
7The Tribunal hereby approves the Procedural Order and Issues List attached to this Decision and Order as Schedule 1, which shall govern the remainder of these proceedings.
HEARING DATES
8The Parties requested that nine days be set aside for a hearing on the merits of the OPA and ZBA appeals.
9The Tribunal granted the request and scheduled a hearing on the merits, to be conducted by video hearing, commencing at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, May 19, 2026 for nine consecutive business days and concluding on Friday, May 29, 2026.
10Parties are asked to log in to the video hearing at least 15 minutes before the start of the event to test their video and audio connections:
GoTo Meeting: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/344779885
Access Code: 344-779-885
11Parties are asked to access and set up the application well in advance of the event to avoid unnecessary delay. The desktop application can be downloaded at GoToMeeting or a web application is available: https://app.gotomeeting.com/home.html.
12Persons who experience technical difficulties accessing the GoToMeeting application or who only wish to listen to the event can connect to the event by calling into an audio-only telephone line: +1-647-497-9373 or (Toll Free) 1-888-299-1889. The Access Code is as indicated above.
13Individuals are directed to connect to the event on the assigned date at the correct time. It is the responsibility of the persons participating in the video hearing to ensure that they are properly connected to the event at the correct time. Questions prior to the hearing event may be directed to the Tribunal’s Case Coordinator having carriage of this case.
ORDER
14THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS that the appeal pursuant to s. 114(15) of the City of Toronto Act, being Tribunal Case No. OLT-24-000186, is hereby adjourned sine die.
15THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS that the Procedural Order and Issues List attached to this Order as Schedule 1 are in effect and shall govern the remainder of these proceedings.
16This Member is not seized.
“S. Dixon”
s. dixon
membeR
Ontario Land Tribunal
Website: www.olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248
The Conservation Review Board, the Environmental Review Tribunal, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and the Mining and Lands Tribunal are amalgamated and continued as the Ontario Land Tribunal (“Tribunal”). Any reference to the preceding tribunals or the former Ontario Municipal Board is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal.
SCHEDULE 1
CASE NO(S).: OLT-25-000184
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended.
Applicant/Appellant
1212763 Ontario Limited and 1212765 Ontario Limited
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan – Failure to adopt the requested amendment
Description:
To facilitate the redevelopment of 1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street.
Reference Number:
19 211934 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street
Municipality/UT:
Toronto/Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Case Name:
1212765 Ontario Limited and 1212763 Ontario Limited v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended.
Subject:
Application to amend the Zoning By-law – Refusal or neglect to make a decision
Description:
To facilitate the redevelopment of 1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street.
Reference Number:
19 211943 STE 12 SA
Property Address:
1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street
Municipality/UT:
Toronto/Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000185
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Case Name:
1212765 Ontario Limited and 1212763 Ontario Limited v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 114(15) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 11, Sched. A.
Subject:
Failure to make a decision on the site plan application
Description:
To facilitate the redevelopment of 1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street.
Reference Number:
19 211934 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1601 and 1603 Bathurst Street
Municipality/UT:
Toronto/Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000186
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000184
OLT Case Name:
1212765 Ontario Limited and 1212763 Ontario Limited v. Toronto (City)
PROCEDURAL ORDER
- The Tribunal may vary or add to the directions in this procedural order at any time by an oral ruling or by another written order, either on the parties’ request or its own motion.
Organization of the Hearing
The video hearing will begin on May 19, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.
The parties’ initial estimation for the length of the hearing is nine days. The parties are expected to cooperate to reduce the length of the hearing by eliminating redundant evidence and attempting to reach settlements on issues where possible. The procedural order deadlines are generally found in Attachment 1.
The parties and participants identified at the case management conference are set out in Attachment 2.
The issues are set out in the Issues List attached as Attachment 3. There will be no changes to this list unless the Tribunal permits, and a party who asks for changes may have costs awarded against it.
The order of evidence shall be as set out in Attachment 4 to this Order. The Tribunal may limit the amount of time allocated for opening statements, evidence in chief (including the qualification of witnesses), cross-examination, evidence in reply and final argument. The length of written argument, if any, may be limited either on the parties’ consent, subject to the Tribunal’s approval, or by Order of the Tribunal.
Any person intending to participate in the hearing should provide a mailing address, email address and a telephone number to the Tribunal as soon as possible – ideally before the case management conference. Any person who will be retaining a representative should advise the other parties and the Tribunal of the representative’s name, address, email address and the phone number as soon as possible.
Any person who intends to participate in the hearing, including parties, counsel and witnesses, is expected to review the Tribunal’s Video Hearing Guide, available on the Tribunal’s website.
Requirements Before the Hearing
A party who intends to call witnesses, whether by summons or not, shall provide to the Tribunal and the other parties a list of the witnesses and the order in which they will be called. This list must be delivered on or before Wednesday, February 18, 2026 (at least 90 days prior to the start of the hearing) and in accordance with paragraph 22 below. A party who intends to call an expert witness must include a copy of the witness’ Curriculum Vitae and the area of expertise in which the witness is prepared to be qualified.
Expert witnesses in the same field shall have a meeting on or before Friday, February 27, 2026 and use best efforts to try to resolve or reduce the issues for the hearing. Following the experts’ meeting the parties must prepare and file a Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues with the OLT case co-ordinator on or before Thursday, March 5, 2026 (at least 75 days prior to the start of the hearing).
An expert witness shall prepare an expert witness statement, which shall list any reports prepared by the expert, or any other reports or documents to be relied on at the hearing. Copies of this must be provided as in paragraph 13 below. Instead of a witness statement, the expert may file his or her entire report if it contains the required information. If this is not done, the Tribunal may refuse to hear the expert’s testimony.
Expert witnesses who are under summons but not paid to produce a report do not have to file an expert witness statement; but the party calling them must file a brief outline of the expert’s evidence as in paragraph 13 below. A party who intends to call a witness who is not an expert must file a brief outline of the witness’ evidence, as in paragraph 13 below.
On or before Friday, March 20, 2026 (at least 60 days prior to the start of the hearing) the parties shall provide copies of their expert witness statements to the other parties and to the OLT case co-ordinator and in accordance with paragraph 22 below.
On or before Friday, March 20, 2026 (at least 60 days prior to the start of the hearing) a participant shall provide copies of their written participant statement to the other parties in accordance with paragraph 22 below. A participant cannot present oral submissions at the hearing on the content of their written statement, unless ordered by the Tribunal.
On or before Tuesday, April 14, 2026 (at least 35 days prior to the start of the hearing) the parties shall confirm with the Tribunal if all the reserved hearing dates are still required.
On or before Friday, April 17, 2026 (at least 30 days prior to the start of the hearing) the parties shall provide copies of their visual evidence to all of the other parties in accordance with paragraph 22 below. If a model will be used, all parties must have a reasonable opportunity to view it before the hearing.
On or before Friday, April 17, 2026 (at least 30 days prior to the start of the hearing) the parties may provide to all other parties and the OLT’s Case co-ordinator a written response to any written evidence in accordance with paragraph 22 below.
The parties shall cooperate to prepare a joint document book which shall be shared with the OLT case co-ordinator on or before Monday, May 4, 2026 (at least 15 days prior to the start of the hearing).
A person wishing to change written evidence, including witness statements, must make a written motion to the Tribunal. See Rule 10 of the Tribunal’s Rules with respect to Motions, which requires that the moving party provide copies of the motion to all other parties 15 days before the Tribunal hears the motion.
A party who provides written evidence of a witness to the other parties must have the witness attend the hearing to give oral evidence, unless the party notifies the Tribunal at least 7 days before the hearing that the written evidence is not part of their record.
The parties shall prepare and file a preliminary hearing plan with the Tribunal on or before Tuesday, May 12, 2026 (at least 7 days prior to the start of the hearing) with a proposed schedule for the hearing that identifies, as a minimum, the parties participating in the hearing, the preliminary matters (if any to be addressed), the anticipated order of evidence, the date each witness is expected to attend, the anticipated length of time for evidence to be presented by each witness in chief, cross-examination and re-examination (if any) and the expected length of time for final submissions. The parties are expected to ensure that the hearing proceeds in an efficient manner and in accordance with the hearing plan. The Tribunal may, at its discretion, change or alter the hearing plan at any time in the course of the hearing.
All filings shall be submitted electronically and in hard copy, if requested by the Tribunal. Electronic copies may be filed by email, an electronic file sharing service for documents that exceed 10MB in size, or as otherwise directed by the Tribunal. The delivery of documents by email shall be governed by the Rule 7.
If the applicant intends to seek approval of a revised proposal at the hearing, the applicant shall provide copies of the revised proposal, including all revised plans, drawings, proposed instruments, updated supporting documents and reports, to the other parties at least 120 calendar days before the start of the hearing. The applicant acknowledges that any revisions to the proposal after that date without the consent of the parties may be grounds for the Tribunal to adjourn the hearing.
No adjournments or delays will be granted before or during the hearing except for serious hardship or illness. The Tribunal’s Rule 17 applies to such requests.
This Member is not seized.
So orders the Tribunal.
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF KEY DATES
Date
Hearing event
Monday, January 19, 2026 (at least 120 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Last date to provide copies of revised proposal, including all revised plans and drawings (if any)
Wednesday, February 18, 2026 (at least 90 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Exchange of List of Witnesses
Friday, February 27, 2026
Expert Witness Meeting
Thursday, March 5, 2026 (at least 75 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Filing of Statement(s) of Agreed Facts and Issues
Friday, March 20, 2026 (at least 60 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Exchange of Witness Statements
Friday, March 20, 2026 (at least 60 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Delivery of Participant Statements
Tuesday, April 14, 2026 (at least 35 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Confirmation to Tribunal if all reserved hearing dates are still required
Friday, April 17, 2026 (at least 30 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Exchange of Reply Witness Statements
Friday, April 17, 2026 (at least 30 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Exchange of Visual Evidence
Monday, May 4, 2026 (at least 15 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Filing of Joint Document Book
Tuesday, May 12, 2026 (at least 7 days prior to the start of the hearing)
Filing of Hearing Plan
Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Hearing Commences
ATTACHMENT 2
LIST OF PARTIES/PARTICIPANTS
PARTIES
- City of Toronto
Derin Abimbola
City of Toronto Legal Services
Planning and Administrative Tribunal Law
Metro Hall 26th fl., 55 John St.
Toronto ON M5V 3C6
416-338-1376
- 1212763 Ontario Limited & 1212765 Ontario Limited
Maggie Bassani
Aird & Berlis LLP
Brookfield Place,
181 Bay St. #1800,
Toronto, ON M5J 2T9
416-865- 3401
Anna Lu
Aird & Berlis LLP
Brookfield Place,
181 Bay St. #1800,
Toronto, ON M5J 2T9
416-865- 3419
PARTICIPANTS
- Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1475
John Stocks
647-567-5646
ATTACHMENT 3
ISSUES LIST
NOTE: The identification of an issue on this list does not mean that all Parties agree that the issue, or the manner in which it is expressed, is appropriate for or relevant to the proper determination of the appeals. The extent of the appropriateness and/or relevance of the issue may be a matter of evidence and/or argument at the Hearing. The identification of an issue on this list by a Party indicates that Party’s intent to lead evidence or argue that the issue is relevant to the proceeding, for the purpose of fairly identifying to the other Parties the case they need to meet and shall not be construed as the Tribunal having jurisdiction over such matters in each circumstance. Accordingly, no Party shall advance an issue not identified on the Issues List without leave of the Tribunal.
Issues for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment
Planning Act
- Do the proposed development, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, have regard to matters of provincial interest set out in Section 2 of the Planning Act, including but not limited to:
a) 2(a) – the protection of ecological systems, including natural areas, features and functions;
b) 2(f) – the adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems;
c) 2(h) – orderly development of safe and healthy communities;
d) 2(j) – adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing;
e) 2(r) – the promotion of built form that is well designed, encourages a sense of place, and provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive, and vibrant;
f) 2 (q) – the promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; and,
g) 2(s) – the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate?
- Would the approval of the proposed development, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, have regard to any information and material that the municipal council or approval authority received in relation to the matter, as required by Section 2.1(2) of the Planning Act?
Provincial Planning Statement (2024)
- Are the proposed development, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment consistent with the policies of the Provincial Planning Statement including, but not limited to:
a) Housing (Section 2.2.(1)(b)(1));
b) Settlement Areas and Settlement Area Boundary Expansions (Section 2.3.1(1) and (2));
c) Energy Conservation, Air Quality and Climate Change (Section 2.9.(1));
d) Natural Heritage (Section 4.1);
e) Natural Hazards (Section 5.1 and 5.2); and,
f) Implementation and Interpretation (Sections 6.1.(1), and 6.1.(5))?
City of Toronto Official Plan
- Do the proposed development, Official Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-law Amendment, conform to the policies of the City of Toronto Official Plan including, but not limited to the policies related to:
a) Structuring Growth in the City (Sections 2.2);
b) Stable but Not Static – Healthy Neighbourhoods and Toronto’s Green Space System and Waterfront (Section 2.3);
c) The Public Realm (Section 3.1.1);
d) Built Form (Sections 3.1.3, and 3.1.4);
e) Housing (Section 3.2.1);
f) Parks and Open Spaces (Section 3.2.3);
g) The Natural Environment (Section 3.4);
h) Neighbourhoods (Section 4.1); and,
i) Implementation (Sections 5.3.2, 5.6)?
Design Guidelines
- Do the proposed development, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment have appropriate regard for and meet the intent and purposes of the applicable City of Toronto Guidelines, including:
a) Mid-rise Building Design Guidelines;
b) Growing Up: Planning for Children in New Vertical Communities;
c) Streetscape Manual;
d) Toronto Accessibility Design Guidelines; and,
e) Pet Friendly Design Guidelines and Best Practices for New Multi-Unit Buildings.
Built Form and Public Realm
- Do the proposed development, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment represent good and appropriate land use planning and urban design, having regard to matters such as:
a) The provincial and municipal policy framework identified in this issues list;
b) Fit with the existing and planned context;
c) The built form, massing and scale, building heights and design, including the impact on the gradual transition in relation to the scale and character of the surrounding area;
d) The proposed setbacks and stepbacks;
e) The proposed sun/shadow impacts on natural heritage areas; and,
f) The proposed wind impacts on the abutting public realm?
- Does the proposed development provide adequate street tree planting and soil volume area to comply with the City’s Streetscape Manual and Toronto Green Standard?
Housing
Does the proposed development retain existing rental units in conformity with Section 3.2.1 of the Official Plan?
Does the proposed development provide an appropriate mix of dwelling units?
Does the proposed development provide an appropriate size for dwelling units?
Servicing
- Does the proposed development have adequate municipal services in place to support the development, including but not limited to the availability of sufficient water, adequate sanitary sewage capacity and the implementation of appropriate stormwater management measures and groundwater management measures?
Environmental Planning
Does the proposed development sustain, restore and enhance the health and integrity of the natural ecosystem, including supporting biodiversity in the City and targeting ecological improvements?
Have natural heritage values and potential negative impacts to the natural heritage system been sufficiently recognized, and appropriate mitigation measures identified to minimize adverse impacts, and where possible restore and enhance the natural heritage system?
Have appropriate buffer areas been identified to help protect natural features and functions from negative impacts associated with the proposed development?
Does the proposed development demonstrate no negative impacts to significant natural features and their ecological functions?
Is the proposed development appropriately set back from existing or potential natural hazards, including the top-of-bank of valleys, ravines and bluffs, and considering the potential impacts of climate change that may increase the risk associated with natural hazards?
Urban Forestry Ravine and Natural Feature Protection Issues
Has an appropriate maintenance buffer (for above-ground and underground structures) been applied from the established setback limit from natural hazards and features?
Has the Ravine and Natural Feature Protection limit been accurately plotted on all relevant drawings?
Have the arborist report and tree protection plan been revised to include all Ravine and Natural Feature Protection regulated trees within 12 metres of any proposed construction?
Will the setback/ buffer lands be naturalised?
Will the setback/buffer lands be redesignated to Natural Areas?
Will the setback/buffer lands be re-zoned to Open Space - Natural?
Public Interest and Good Planning
- Is the proposed development, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment good planning and in the public interest?
Implementation
- If the requested Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment are approved by the Tribunal, in whole or in part, should the Tribunal’s final order be withheld until it has been advised by the City Solicitor that:
a) the owner has submitted an updated Natural Heritage Impact Study to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b) the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment is to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor;
c) the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment is to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor;
d) the applicant has submitted a revised Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Review, including the Foundation Drainage Report ("Engineering Reports") to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Development Engineering, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water;
e) the applicant has secured the design and financial securities in respect of any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Engineering Reports, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the Engineering Reports accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water, unless otherwise secured through a holding provision in the by-law;
f) the applicant has ensured that implementation of the accepted Engineering Reports does not require changes to the proposed amending By-law or that any required changes have been made to the proposed amending By-law to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, and the City Solicitor, including the use of a Holding ("H") By-law symbol regarding any new municipal servicing infrastructure or upgrades to existing municipal servicing infrastructure, as may be required;
g) the applicant has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Development Engineering in the memo dated May 21, 2024, as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
h) the applicant has completed, the necessary studies related to pedestrian level wind impacts and sun and shadow, and their recommendations are addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Executive Director, Development Review;
i) the applicant has addressed all outstanding issues raised by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, including achieving the appropriate development setback from the erosion hazard associated with the Cedarvale Ravine Park;
j) the applicant has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Ravine and Natural Feature Protection in the memo dated June 14, 2024 and Tree Protection and Plan Review in the memo dated May 15, 2024 as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment application; and,
k) City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 22 148358 STE 12 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of the 9 existing rental dwelling units at 1601 Bathurst Street, and the owner has entered into, and registered on title to the lands, one or more agreements with the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision including: 1. replacement of the existing 9 rental housing units, including the same number of units, bedroom type and size and with similar rents; and 2. an acceptable Tenant Assistance Plan addressing the right for existing tenants to return to a replacement rental unit.
ATTACHMENT 4
ORDER OF EVIDENCE
Appellant
City of Toronto
Appellant Reply, if any