Ontario Land Tribunal

Tribunal ontarien de l’aménagement du territoire

ISSUE DATE: March 05, 2025

CASE NO(S).: OLT-24-001157

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant: Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc.

Subject: Application to amend the Zoning By-law – Refusal or neglect to make a decision

Description: To permit the development of 152 single-detached dwellings, 117 street townhouse dwellings

Reference Number: RZ014/22

Property Address: 75 Woolwich Street East

Municipality/UT: Centre Wellington/ Wellington

OLT Case No.: OLT-24-001157

OLT Lead Case No.: OLT-24-001157

OLT Case Name: Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc. v. Wellington (County)

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 51(34) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant: Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc.

Subject: Proposed Plan of Subdivision – Failure of Approval Authority to make a decision

Description: To permit the development of 152 single-detached dwellings, 117 street townhouse dwellings

Reference Number: 23T- 22005

Property Address: 75 Woolwich Street East

Municipality/UT: Centre Wellington/ Wellington

OLT Case No.: OLT-24-001158

OLT Lead Case No.: OLT-24-001157

Heard: January 24, 2025 by Video Hearing

APPEARANCES:

Parties	Counsel
Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc.	Ira Kagan, Kristie Stitt, Sarah Kagan (in absentia)
Township of Centre Wellington	Eric Davis, Chris Manning (in absentia)
County of Wellington	Peter Pickfield, Colin Léger (in absentia)
Upper Grand District School Board	Justine Reyes, Brad Teichman (in absentia)

MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY BITA M. RAJAEE ON JANUARY 24, 2025 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL

INTRODUCTION

1This event was the first Case Management Conference (“CMC”) before the Tribunal with respect to appeals under sections 34(11) and 51(34) of the Planning Act (“Act”) by Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc. (“Applicant”) resulting from the failure of the Township of Centre Wellington (“Township”) to make a decision within the statutory timeframes of the Act on an application for a Zoning By-law Amendment (“ZBA”), and the failure of the County of Wellington (“County”) to make a decision on an application for a draft plan of subdivision (“DPOS”).

2The ZBA and DPOS relate to lands located at 75 Woolwich Street, in the Township. The purpose of the applications is to permit the development of 152 single-detached dwellings and 117 street townhouse dwellings.

3At the CMC, the Tribunal canvassed Counsel, who confirmed that there were no issues with the service of the Notice of CMC. The Tribunal is in receipt of the Affidavit of Service sworn by Christopher J. Drew, on January 7, 2025, which was marked as Exhibit 1, and confirms that Notice was adequately served. No further notice is required.

STATUS REQUEST

4The Tribunal was tasked with adjudicating a Party status request received from Upper Grand District School Board (“School Board”), who is the owner of the adjacent property at 23 Woolwich Street, on which it operates an elementary school. The School Board has concerns with the proposal and its impact on the existing school, such as: safety; drainage issues; the operation of the well serving the school; and the location of the proposed park block. The Applicant did not raise objections to this Party status request. The Township and the County consented to the request.

5The Tribunal determined that the School Board has an interest in the matter, meets the requirements of being a Party in this proceeding, and will assist the Tribunal in understanding the potential impacts of the ZBA and the DPOS. The Tribunal granted Party status to the School Board.

PROCEDURAL ORDER AND ISSUES LIST

6The Parties provided a draft Procedural Order (“PO”) and Issues List (“IL”) prior to the CMC for the Tribunal’s consideration and ratification. At the CMC, the Tribunal discussed the IL, and raised concern with the Township and County issue numbers 6, 7, 9, and 12. The Tribunal indicated that these issues seemed to raise jurisdictional matters or the potential necessity of related applications (such as an Official Plan Amendment). The Parties advised that the IL was currently in draft form and would be finalized in accordance with the timelines noted in paragraph 6 of the PO. Counsels to the County and the Township indicated that they required additional time to determine their exact position at the Merit Hearing regarding those particular issues. The Parties are engaged in some discussions, and may pursue mediation, which may lead to the scoping or resolution of some of the issues, including those noted above.

7However, the Tribunal deemed it prudent, and the Parties agreed, to schedule a second CMC, by which time it can be determined whether a jurisdictional motion or consideration of related applications is required. If not, the Parties can advise the Tribunal that the second CMC is not necessary. However, if a motion is required, this can be discussed and/or scheduled at the second CMC. If the Parties wish for a motion to be addressed at the second CMC, they are required to submit the materials in advance, in accordance with the requirements of the Tribunal’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

8On consent of the Parties, the draft PO and IL provided will be issued at this time, with the understanding that paragraph 6 of the PO allows the Parties to provide an updated IL at a later date.

MEDIATION AND SETTLEMENT

9The Parties indicated that they are engaging in discussions, and may pursue mediation in the future. The Parties are directed to advise the Tribunal in writing should they reach a settlement with respect to some or all of the issues prior to the Merit Hearing. Should they wish to pursue Tribunal-assisted mediation, they may make a written request to the Tribunal through the Case Coordinator for those services.

SECOND CMC AND HEARING

10As discussed above, a second CMC has been scheduled to take place by Video Hearing on Thursday, May 15, 2025.

11Additionally, the Merit Hearing was also scheduled. Given the number of Parties, potential issues, and potential witnesses, the Tribunal agreed that a 10-day Merit Hearing would be sufficient. A Merit Hearing has been scheduled to take place, commencing on Monday, October 20 2025, to, and including, Friday, October 31, 2025.

12The Hearing events are scheduled to proceed by video as follows:

Thursday, May 15, 2025 at 10 a.m. (one-day CMC)

GoTo Meeting: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/687587165

Access code: 687-587-165

Audio-only telephone line: +1-647-497-9373 or (toll-free) +1-888-299-1889

Audio-only access code: 687-587-165

Monday, October 20, 2025 at 10 a.m. (10-day Merit Hearing)

GoTo Meeting: https://meet.goto.com/278736685

Access code: 278-736-685

Audio-only line: +1-647-497-9391 or (toll-free) +1-888-455-1389

Audio-only access code: 278-736-685

13Parties are asked to log in to the event at least 15 minutes before it begins to test their video and audio connections.

14Parties are asked to access and set up the application well in advance of the event to avoid unnecessary delay. The desktop application can be downloaded at GoToMeeting or a web application is available: https://app.gotomeeting.com/home.html

15Persons who experience technical difficulties accessing the GoTo Meeting application or who only wish to listen to the event can connect to it by calling in to an audio-only telephone line.

16Individuals are directed to connect to the event on the assigned date at the correct time. It is the responsibility of the persons participating in the event to ensure that they are properly connected at the correct time. Questions prior to the event may be directed to the Tribunal’s Case Coordinator.

ORDER

17THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS as follows:

a. Upper Grand District School Board is now a Party in this proceeding;

b. A second Case Management Conference is scheduled as described above in this Decision;

c. The Merit Hearing is scheduled as described above in this Decision; and

d. The Procedural Order and Issues List, attached as Schedule A, shall govern this proceeding.

18There will be no further notice.

19This Member is not seized but may be contacted through the Case Coordinator should procedural issues arise.

“Bita M. Rajaee”

BITA M. RAJAEE

MEMBER

Ontario Land Tribunal

Website: www.olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248

The Conservation Review Board, the Environmental Review Tribunal, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and the Mining and Lands Tribunal are amalgamated and continued as the Ontario Land Tribunal (“Tribunal”). Any reference to the preceding tribunals or the former Ontario Municipal Board is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal.

SCHEDULE A

CASE NO(S).: OLT-24-001157

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant: Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc.

Subject: Application to amend the Zoning By-law – Refusal or neglect to make a decision

Description: To permit the development of 152 single-detached dwellings, 117 street townhouse dwellings

Reference Number: RZ014/22

Property Address: 75 Woolwich Street East

Municipality/UT: Centre Wellington/ Wellington

OLT Case No.: OLT-24-001157

OLT Lead Case No.: OLT-24-001157

OLT Case Name: Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc. v. Wellington (County)

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 51(34) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant: Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc.

Subject: Proposed Plan of Subdivision – Failure of Approval Authority to make a decision

Description: To permit the development of 152 single-detached dwellings, 117 street townhouse dwellings

Reference Number: 23T- 22005

Property Address: 75 Woolwich Street East

Municipality/UT: Centre Wellington/ Wellington

OLT Case No.: OLT-24-001158

OLT Lead Case No.: OLT-24-001157

PROCEDURAL ORDER

1. The Tribunal may vary or add to these rules at any time, either on request or as it sees fit. It may alter this Order by an oral ruling, or by another written Order.

2. Further refinement of this Procedural Order is anticipated as the positions of the parties are refined.

Organization of the Hearing

3. The hearing will commence on Monday, October 20, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. and will be conducted virtually.

4. The parties’ initial estimation for the length of the hearing is ten (10) days. The parties are expected to cooperate to reduce the length of the hearing by eliminating redundant evidence and attempting to reach settlements on issues where possible.

5. The parties and participants to the hearing are set out in Attachment 1.

6. The current issues are set out in the Issues List attached as Attachment 2. The parties shall provide a final Issues List to the parties and the Tribunal no later than Friday, May 9, 2025. Except as contemplated in paragraph 2, there will be no changes to this list unless the Tribunal permits, and a party who asks for changes may have costs awarded against it.

7. The order of evidence shall be as set out in Attachment 3 to this Order. The Tribunal may limit the amount of time allocated for opening statements, evidence in chief (including the qualification of witnesses), cross-examination, evidence in reply and final argument. The length of written argument, if any, may be limited either on consent or by Order of the Tribunal.

8. Any person intending to participate in the hearing should provide a mailing address, email address and a telephone number to the Tribunal and the other parties as soon as possible. Any person who will be retaining a representative should advise the other parties and the Tribunal of the representative’s name, address, email address and the phone number as soon as possible.

Requirements Before the Hearing

9. A party who intends to call witnesses, whether by summons or not, shall provide to the Tribunal and the other parties a list of the witnesses and the order in which they will be called. This list must be delivered on or before Monday, June 23, 2025 and in accordance with paragraph 22 below. A party who intends to call an expert witness must include a copy of the witness’ Curriculum Vitae and the area of expertise in which the witness is prepared to be qualified.

10. Expert witnesses in the same field shall have a meeting on or before Friday, July 25, 2025 and use best efforts to try to resolve or reduce the issues for the hearing. Following the experts’ meeting the parties must prepare and file a Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues with the OLT case co-ordinator on or before Friday, August 1, 2025.

11. An expert witness shall prepare an expert witness statement, which shall list any reports prepared by the expert, or any other reports or documents to be relied on at the hearing. Copies of this must be provided as in paragraph 13 below. Instead of a witness statement, the expert may file his or her entire report if it contains the required information. If this is not done, the Tribunal may refuse to hear the expert’s testimony.

12. Expert witnesses who are under summons but not paid to produce a report do not have to file an expert witness statement; but the party calling them must file a brief outline of the expert’s evidence as in paragraph 13 below. A party who intends to call a witness who is not an expert must file a brief outline of the witness’ evidence, as in paragraph 13 below.

13. On or before Friday, August 29, 2025, the parties shall provide copies of their witness and expert witness statements to the other parties and to the OLT case co-ordinator and in accordance with paragraph 22 below.

14. On or before Friday, August 29, 2025, participants shall provide copies of their written participant statement to the other parties in accordance with paragraph 22 below. A participant cannot present oral submissions at the hearing on the content of their written statement, unless ordered by the Tribunal.

15. On or before Wednesday, September 10, 2025, the parties shall confirm with the Tribunal if all the reserved hearing dates are still required.

16. On or before Monday, September 29, 2025, the parties shall provide copies of their visual evidence to all of the other parties in accordance with paragraph 22 below. If a model will be used, all parties must have a reasonable opportunity to view it before the hearing.

17. Parties may provide to all other parties and the OLT case co-ordinator a written response to any written evidence on or before Monday, September 22, 2025 in accordance with paragraph 22 below.

18. The parties shall cooperate to prepare and file a Joint Document Book with the Tribunal on or before Friday, October 10, 2025. If a party wants a printed copy of the electronic Document Book for its own use it shall print it themselves at their own cost. It is not anticipated that the Tribunal will require a printed copy for itself but if it does, the Tribunal will print its own copy.

19. A person wishing to change written evidence, including witness statements, must make a written motion to the Tribunal. See Rule 10 of the Tribunal’s Rules with respect to Motions, which requires that the moving party provide copies of the motion to all other parties 15 days prior to the hearing commencing before the Tribunal hears the motion.

20. A party who provides a witness’ evidence to the other parties must have the witness attend the hearing to give oral evidence, unless the party notifies the Tribunal at least 10 days prior to the hearing commencing, that the written evidence is not part of the record.

21. The parties shall prepare and file a hearing plan with the Tribunal on or before Friday, October 10, 2025 with a proposed schedule for the hearing that identifies, as a minimum, the parties participating in the hearing, the preliminary matters (if any to be addressed), the anticipated order of evidence, the date each witness is expected to attend, the anticipated length of time for evidence to be presented by each witness in chief, cross-examination and re-examination (if any) and the expected length of time for final submissions. The parties are expected to ensure that the hearing proceeds in an efficient manner and in accordance with the hearing plan. The Tribunal may, at its discretion, change or alter the hearing plan at any time in the course of the hearing.

22. All filings shall be submitted electronically. Electronic copies may be filed by email, an electronic file sharing service for documents that exceed 10MB in size, or as otherwise directed by the Tribunal. The delivery of documents by email shall be governed by the Rule 7.

23. No adjournments or delays will be granted before or during the hearing except for serious hardship or illness. The Tribunal’s Rule 17 applies to such requests.

24. The purpose of the Procedural Order and the meaning of the terms used in the Procedural Order are set out in Attachment 4.

25. A summary of the various procedural dates is set out in Attachment 5.

This Member is not seized.

So orders the Tribunal.

ATTACHMENT 1

LIST OF PARTIES and participants

Parties

1. Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc. Kagan Shastri DeMelo Winer Park LLP 188 Avenue Road Toronto, ON., M5R 2J1 Ira T. Kagan / Kristie Stitt/ Sarah R. Kagan T: 416 368 2100 x226 / x244/ x243 E: ikagan@ksllp.ca /kstitt@ksllp.ca/ skagan@ksllp.ca

2. Township of Centre Wellington SV Law 245 Hanlon Creek Boulevard, Unit 102 Guelph, ON, N1C 0A1 Eric Davis / Chris Manning T: 519-837-2100 x304 / 324 E: edavis@svlaw.ca / cmanning@svlaw.ca

3. County of Wellington Garrod Pickfield LLP 9 Norwich Street West Guelph, ON, N1H 2G8 Peter Pickfield / Colin Léger T: 519-837-0500 E: pickfield@garrodpickfield.ca / cleger@garrodpickfield.ca

4. Upper Grand District School Board Overland LLP 5255 Yonge Street, Suite 1101 Toronto, ON., M2N 6P4 Brad Teichman / Justine Reyes T: 416-730-0180 / 416-730-8377 E: bteichman@overlandllp.ca / jreyes@overlandllp.ca

ATTACHMENT 2

PRELIMINARY ISSUES LIST

Note 1: This Preliminary Issues List is subject to change and is based on a preliminary review of Submission #3 of the Appellant’s Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications submitted to the Township of Centre Wellington, with a copy to the County, on November 20, 2024.

Note 2: The identification of an issue does not mean that all parties agree that such issue, or the manner in which the issue is expressed, is appropriate or relevant to the determination of the Tribunal at the hearing. The extent to which the issues are appropriate, within the jurisdiction of the OLT, or relevant to the determination at the hearing will be a matter of evidence and/or argument at the hearing.

Township and County Issues

1. Does the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision (the “Proposed Development”) have appropriate regard for the matters of provincial interest enumerated in section 2 of the Planning Act?

2. Does the Draft Plan of Subdivision have regard to the criteria enumerated in subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act including, but not limited to, subsections (b), (c), (i) and (k)?

3. Is the Proposed Development consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024), including, but not limited to, policies 2.3, 3.6 and 4.3?

4. Does the Proposed Development conform to the County of Wellington Official Plan, including, but not limited to, sections 6.4, 7.3, 10.1 and 11?

5. Does the Proposed Development conform to the Township of Centre Wellington Municipal Official Plan, including, but not limited to, section C.7?

6. Has appropriate consideration and justification been given to demonstrate why accommodating a storm water management facility on the Proposed Development lands is not feasible?

7. Can approval of the proposed stormwater management pond be considered by the Tribunal in the hearing on this matter given that this facility is proposed on lands that are beyond the geographic boundaries of the lands subject to the applications for the Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision?

8. If the answer to issue 7 is “yes”, is it appropriate, and in accordance with sound planning, to locate stormwater management facilities which service the Proposed Development on lands which are:

a. adjacent to, and beyond the boundaries of, the land proposed to be subdivided; and/or

b. located beyond the existing urban settlement boundary of the municipality?

9. If stormwater management facilities are proposed to be located on lands adjacent to, and beyond the boundaries of, the lands proposed to be subdivided and re-zoned, as well as beyond the Township’s Urban Boundary, is an Official Plan Amendment required?

10. Is it in accordance with good planning and urban design to ensure that the units along Woolwich St. / SR15 be designed to appear to face Woolwich St.?

11. What are the appropriate conditions that should be imposed on the Draft Plan of Subdivision pursuant to subsection 51(25) of the Planning Act?

12. Can draft plan conditions be imposed, and if so, enforced, in relation to lands that are beyond the boundaries of the land that is proposed to be subdivided, pursuant to subsection 51(25) of the Planning Act?

13. Does the Proposed Development constitute good land use planning?

Upper Grand District School Board Issues

Planning Act

14. Do the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision (the “Proposed Development”) have regard to matters of provincial interest set out in Section 2 of the Planning Act, particularly Subsections 2(h), (n), (o) and (r)?

15. Does the Proposed Development have regard for the criteria set out in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act, as it relates to considerations of the health, safety and convenience of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality, and the adequacy of school sites?

Provincial Planning Statement (2024)

16. Is the Proposed Development consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024), including policies 2.1.6(a), 2.2.1(c), 3.1.1, 3.1.4, 3.2.1, 3.9.1(a), 6.2.1(a) and (d) and 6.2.4?

County of Wellington Official Plan (July 2024 Consolidation)

17. Does the Proposed Development conform with the County of Wellington Official Plan, including policies 4.6.4 (c) and (h), 10.1.3 (e), (l) and (n), 12.2 (c), and 13.12.2 (a)?

Township of Centre Wellington Municipal Official Plan (Feb 2024 Office Consolidation)

18. Does the Proposed Development conform with the Township of Centre Wellington Official Plan, including policies B.4.(7), (9), (10) and (12), C.12.2.1, C.12.5.1.2 and C.12.5.1.3?

General

19. Are the proposed pedestrian connections between the Proposed Development and the abutting elementary school appropriate having regard to the safety of existing and future residents and students, and the grade differences between the two properties?

20. Will the drainage planned for the Proposed Development adversely impact the abutting elementary school as a result of, among other things, the grade differences between the two properties?

21. Are the School Board’s conditions of approval reasonable having regard to the nature of the Proposed Development and its location abutting an elementary school?

22. Does the Proposed Development reflect good land use planning and is it in the public interest?

ATTACHMENT 3

ORDER OF EVIDENCE

1. Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc.
2. Township of Centre Wellington
3. County of Wellington
4. Upper Grand District School Board
5. Cachet Developments (Elora) Inc. in reply

ATTACHMENT 4

Meaning of terms used in the Procedural Order:

A party is an individual or corporation permitted by the Tribunal to participate fully in the hearing by receiving copies of written evidence, presenting witnesses, cross-examining the witnesses of the other parties, and making submissions on all of the evidence. An unincorporated group cannot be a party and it must appoint one person to speak for it, and that person must accept the other responsibilities of a party as set out in the Order. Parties do not have to be represented by a lawyer and may have an agent speak for them. The agent must have written authorization from the party.

NOTE that a person who wishes to become a party before or at the hearing, and who did not request this at the case management conference (CMC), must ask the Tribunal to permit this.

A participant is an individual or corporation, whether represented by a lawyer or not, who may make a written submission to the Tribunal. A participant cannot make an oral submission to the Tribunal or present oral evidence (testify in-person) at the hearing (only a party may do so). Section 17 of the Ontario Land Tribunal Act states that a person who is not a party to a proceeding may only make a submission to the Tribunal in writing. The Tribunal may direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions from the Tribunal on the content of their written submission, should that be found necessary by the Tribunal. A participant may also be asked questions by the parties should the Tribunal direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions on the content of their written submission.

A participant must be identified and be accorded participant status by the Tribunal at the CMC. A participant will not receive notice of conference calls on procedural issues that may be scheduled prior to the hearing, nor receive notice of mediation. A participant cannot ask for costs, or review of a decision, as a participant does not have the rights of a party to make such requests of the Tribunal.

Written evidence includes all written material, reports, studies, documents, letters and witness statements which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing. These must have pages numbered consecutively throughout the entire document, even if there are tabs or dividers in the material.

Visual evidence includes photographs, maps, videos, models, and overlays which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing.

A witness statement is a short written outline of the person’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a list of the issues which he or she will discuss; and a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing.

An expert witness statement should include his or her (1) name and address, (2) qualifications, (3) a list of the issues he or she will address, (4) the witness’ opinions on those issues and the complete reasons supporting their opinions and conclusions and (5) a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing. An expert witness statement must be accompanied by an acknowledgement of expert’s duty.

A participant statement is a short written outline of the person’s or group’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a statement of the participant’s position on the appeal; a list of the issues which the participant wishes to address and the submissions of the participant on those issues; and a list of reports or materials, if any, which the participant wishes to refer to in their statement.

Additional Information

A summons may compel the appearance of a person before the Tribunal who has not agreed to appear as a witness. A party must ask a Tribunal Member or the senior staff of the Tribunal to issue a summons through a request. (See Rule 13 on the summons procedure.) The request should indicate how the witness’ evidence is relevant to the hearing. If the Tribunal is not satisfied from the information provided in the request that the evidence is relevant, necessary or admissible, the party requesting the summons may provide a further request with more detail or bring a motion in accordance with the Rules.

The order of examination of witnesses is usually direct examination, cross-examination and re-examination in the following way:

• direct examination by the party presenting the witness;
• direct examination by any party of similar interest, in the manner determined by the Tribunal;
• cross-examination by parties of opposite interest;
• re-examination by the party presenting the witness; or
• another order of examination mutually agreed among the parties or directed by the Tribunal.

ATTACHMENT 5

SUMMARY OF FILING DATES

EVENT	DATE
1st Case Management Conference	Friday, January 24, 2025
Final Issues List due	Friday, May 9, 2025
Parties to exchange their List of Witnesses	Monday, June 23, 2025
Deadline for Meeting of Like Experts	Friday, July 25, 2025
Deadline to file Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues	Friday, August 1, 2025
Parties to exchange their Witness and Expert Witness Statements Participants to provide their Participant Statements	Friday, August 29, 2025
Parties to confirm if all the reserved hearing dates are still required	Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Parties to exchange their Reply Witness Statements	Monday, September 22, 2025
Parties to exchange their Visual Evidence	Monday, September 29, 2025
Parties to File Joint Document Book Parties to File Preliminary Hearing Plan	Friday, October 10, 2025
Hearing commences	October 20, 2025