Ontario Land Tribunal
Tribunal ontarien de l’aménagement du territoire
ISSUE DATE:
November 28, 2025
CASE NO(S).:
OLT-25-000652
OLT-25-000654
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
Biercap O'Connor Eglinton Inc.
Subject:
Proposed Official Plan Amendment
Description:
To permit development of a 37-storey mixed-use building containing 424 dwelling units, including 75 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
24 194386 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1675-1685 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000652
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000652
OLT Case Name:
Toronto Catholic District School Board v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
Biercap O'Connor Eglinton Inc.
Subject:
Zoning By-law
Description:
To permit development of a 37-storey mixed-use building containing 424 dwelling units, including 75 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
By-Law 827-2025
Property Address:
1675-1685 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000653
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000652
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc.
Subject:
Proposed Official Plan Amendment
Description:
To permit the development of a 39-storey mixed-use building, 8 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
24 192670 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1711 - 1741 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000654
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000654
OLT Case Name:
Toronto Catholic District School Board v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc.
Subject:
Zoning By-law
Description:
To permit the development of a 39-storey mixed-use building, 8 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
24 192670 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1711 - 1741 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000655
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000654
Heard:
November 18, 2025 by video hearing
APPEARANCES:
Parties
Counsel
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Tara Piurko Safa Warsi
Biercap O'Connor Eglinton Inc.
Joe Hoffman
1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc.
Joe Hoffman
City of Toronto
Amrit Sandhu
MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY C. I. MOLINARI ON november 18, 2025 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL
INTRODUCTION
1The Tribunal convened a first Case Management Conference (“CMC”) with respect to two sets of appeals filed pursuant to s. 17(36) and s. 34(11) of the Planning Act (“Act”).
2The appeals under Tribunal File No. OLT-25-000652 (“Biercap Appeals”) were filed by Toronto Catholic District School Board (“TCDSB”) against the approval by the City of Toronto (“City”) of Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) and Zoning By-law Amendment (“ZBA”) applications filed by Biercap O'Connor Eglinton Inc. The purpose of the applications is to facilitate the development of a 37‑storey mixed-use building for the properties located at 1675-1685 Eglinton Avenue West.
3The appeals under Tribunal File No. OLT-25-000654 (“1711 Appeals”) were also filed by the TCDSB against the approval by the City of OPA and ZBA applications filed by 1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc. The purpose of the applications is to facilitate the development of a 39-storey mixed-use building for the properties located at 1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West.
NOTICE
4An Affidavit of Service sworn on October 14, 2025, attesting to the giving of notice for each proceeding, was marked as Exhibit 1. There were no concerns raised regarding the notice, and the Tribunal was satisfied that proper notice had been provided. In this regard, no further notice is required for either set of appeals.
PROCEEDINGS TO BE HEARD TOGETHER
5The Parties requested that the Biercap Appeals and the 1711 Appeals be heard together, on the basis that the properties are adjacent, the Parties coordinated their submissions, and the City reviewed and processed the applications together.
6The Tribunal granted the request for the proceedings to be heard together in accordance with Rule 16 of the Tribunals Rules of Practice and Procedure.
PARTY AND PARTICIPANT STATUS REQUESTS
7In advance of the CMC, the Tribunal received one Participant status request for the Biercap Appeals from Bob Murphy, citing concerns related to density, transit, parking, and gentrification, among other comments.
8There were no objections from the Parties, and the Tribunal granted Participant status to Mr. Murphy as he has a genuine interest in the matter and could assist the Tribunal in making its decision at the merit hearing.
9No additional requests for Participant status were received during the CMC.
10There were no requests for Party status ahead of, or during, the CMC.
PROCEDURAL ORDER
11The Tribunal was in receipt of a draft Procedural Order (“PO”) but with no Issues List (“IL”) attached. Ms. Piurko advised that the IL has been provided to Mr. Hoffman, and it was agreed by the Parties that the final draft PO would be submitted to the Case Coordinator by Tuesday, November 25, 2025, for approval by the Tribunal.
12The Tribunal has since received, reviewed, and approved the PO attached as Schedule 1 to this Decision.
HEARING EVENT
13A five-day merit hearing was scheduled to commence at 10 a.m. on Monday, June 22, 2026, through to Friday, June 26, 2026, by video hearing.
14Parties and Participants are asked to log in to the event at least 15 minutes before it begins to test their video and audio connections:
GoTo Meeting: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/914098901
Access Code: 914-098-901
15Parties and Participants are asked to access and set up the application well in advance of the event to avoid unnecessary delay. The desktop application can be downloaded at GoTo Meeting or a web application is available: https://app.gotomeeting.com/home.html
16Persons who experience technical difficulties accessing the GoTo Meeting application or who only wish to listen to the event can connect to it by calling in to an audio-only telephone line: +1 (647) 497-9373 or (Toll-Free) 1-888-299-1889. The access code is the same as the access code noted above.
17Individuals are directed to connect to the event on the assigned date at the correct time. It is the responsibility of the persons participating in the event to ensure that they are properly connected at the correct time. Questions prior to the event may be directed to the Tribunal’s Case Coordinator.
ADVISORIES
18The Tribunal advised the Parties of the options of Tribunal-led mediation and/or a written hearing if a settlement is reached, and to contact the Case Coordinator to determine next steps as required.
19The Tribunal advised the Parties to ensure that their witnesses address the concerns of the Participant and s. 2 of the Act in their evidence at the merit hearing.
ORDER
20THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:
a) The proceedings for Tribunal File Nos. OLT-25-000652 and OLT‑25‑000654 shall be heard together;
b) Participant status is granted to Bob Murphy under Tribunal File No. OLT‑25-000652;
c) A five-day merit hearing will be held by video hearing as scheduled above;
d) The Procedural Order, attached as Schedule 1 to this Decision, is approved and shall govern the proceedings.
21No further notice is required.
22The Member is not seized of these matters.
“C. I. Molinari”
C. I. MOLINARI
MEMBER
Ontario Land Tribunal
Website: www.olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248
The Conservation Review Board, the Environmental Review Tribunal, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and the Mining and Lands Tribunal are amalgamated and continued as the Ontario Land Tribunal (“Tribunal”). Any reference to the preceding tribunals or the former Ontario Municipal Board is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal.
SCHEDULE 1
OLT CASE NO (S).: OLT-25-000652
OLT-25-000654
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
Biercap O'Connor Eglinton Inc.
Subject:
Proposed Official Plan Amendment
Description:
To permit development of a 37-storey mixed-use building containing 424 dwelling units, including 75 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
24 194386 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1675-1685 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000652
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000652
OLT Case Name:
Toronto Catholic District School Board v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
Biercap O'Connor Eglinton Inc.
Subject:
Zoning By-law
Description:
To permit development of a 37-storey mixed-use building containing 424 dwelling units, including 75 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
By-Law 827-2025
Property Address:
1675-1685 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000653
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000652
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc.
Subject:
Proposed Official Plan Amendment
Description:
To permit the development of a 39-storey mixed-use building, 8 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
24 192670 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1711 - 1741 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000654
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000654
OLT Case Name:
Toronto Catholic District School Board v. Toronto (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended
Appellant
Toronto Catholic District School Board
Applicant
1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc.
Subject:
Zoning By-law
Description:
To permit the development of a 39-storey mixed-use building, 8 rental replacement units, and commercial-retail space.
Reference Number:
24 192670 STE 12 OZ
Property Address:
1711 - 1741 Eglinton Avenue W
Municipality/UT:
Toronto
OLT Case No:
OLT-25-000655
OLT Lead Case No:
OLT-25-000654
PROCEDURAL ORDER
The Tribunal may vary or add to the directions in this procedural order at any time by an oral ruling or by another written order, either on the parties’ request or its own motion.
OLT Lead Case No. OLT-25-000652 and OLT Lead Case No. OLT-25-000654 relate to separate appeals by the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the properties 1675-1685 Eglinton Avenue West and 1711 - 1741 Eglinton Avenue West, respectively. These appeals shall be heard together and the Procedural Order shall apply to the appeals for both properties.
Organization of the Hearing
The video hearing will begin on June 22, 2026 at 10 a.m.
The parties’ initial estimation for the length of the hearing is 5 days. The parties are expected to cooperate to reduce the length of the hearing by eliminating redundant evidence and attempting to reach settlements on issues where possible.
The procedural order deadlines are found in Attachment 1.
The parties and participants identified at the case management conference are set out in Attachment 2.
The issues are set out in the Issues List attached as Attachment 3. There will be no changes to this list unless the Tribunal permits, and a party who asks for changes may have costs awarded against it.
The order of evidence shall be as set out in Attachment 4 to this Order. The Tribunal may limit the amount of time allocated for opening statements, evidence in chief (including the qualification of witnesses), cross-examination, evidence in reply and final argument. The length of written argument, if any, may be limited either on the parties’ consent, subject to the Tribunal’s approval, or by Order of the Tribunal.
Any person intending to participate in the hearing should provide a mailing address, email address and a telephone number to the Tribunal as soon as possible – ideally before the case management conference. Any person who will be retaining a representative should advise the other parties and the Tribunal of the representative’s name, address, email address and the phone number as soon as possible.
Any person who intends to participate in the hearing, including parties, counsel and witnesses, is expected to review the Tribunal’s Video Hearing Guide, available on the Tribunal’s website.
Requirements Before the Hearing
If revisions by either of the Applicants to By-laws 827-2025, 828-2025, 829-2025, or 830-2025 are proposed for the hearing, either of the Applicants shall provide copies of those revision(s), including all revised plans, drawings, revised instruments, updated supporting documents and reports to support such revision(s), to the other Parties on or before February 23, 2026. The Parties acknowledge that any revisions to said By-laws after that date without the consent of the Parties may be grounds for a request to adjourn the hearing.
As City Council passed City of Toronto By-laws 827-2025, 828-2025, 829-2025, and 830-2025 for the lands subject of this Procedural Order, said By-laws having been appealed to the Tribunal, if either of the Applicants proposes changes to said By-law, the City shall be given an opportunity to seek instructions from City Council prior to the commencement of the hearing and this Procedural Order shall not prevent the City from taking a position with respect to such changes to the By-laws as may be directed by City Council.
A party who intends to call witnesses, whether by summons or not, shall provide to the Tribunal and the other parties a list of the witnesses and the order in which they will be called. This list must be delivered on or before April 3, 2026 and in accordance with paragraph 26 below. A party who intends to call an expert witness must include a copy of the witness’ Curriculum Vitae and the area of expertise in which the witness is prepared to be qualified.
Expert witnesses in the same field shall have a meeting on or before April 13, 2026 and use best efforts to try to resolve or reduce the issues for the hearing. Following the experts’ meeting the parties must prepare and file a Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues with the OLT case co-ordinator on or before April 23, 2026.
An expert witness shall prepare an expert witness statement, which shall list any reports prepared by the expert, or any other reports or documents to be relied on at the hearing. Copies of this must be provided as in paragraph 17 below. Instead of a witness statement, the expert may file his or her entire report if it contains the required information. If this is not done, the Tribunal may refuse to hear the expert’s testimony.
Expert witnesses who are under summons but not paid to produce a report do not have to file an expert witness statement; but the party calling them must file a brief outline of the expert’s evidence, as in paragraph 17 below. A party who intends to call a witness who is not an expert must file a brief outline of the witness’ evidence, as in paragraph 17 below.
On or before May 8, 2026, the parties shall provide copies of their witness statements and/or expert witness statements to the other parties and to the OLT case co-ordinator and in accordance with paragraph 26 below.
On or before May 8, 2026, a participant shall provide copies of their written participant statement to the other parties in accordance with paragraph 26 below. A participant cannot present oral submissions at the hearing on the content of their written statement, unless ordered by the Tribunal.
On or before May 18, 2026, the parties shall confirm with the Tribunal if all the reserved hearing dates are still required.
On or before June 12, 2026, the parties shall provide copies of their visual evidence to all of the other parties in accordance with paragraph 26 below. If a model will be used, all parties must have a reasonable opportunity to view it before the hearing.
Parties may provide to all other parties and the OLT case co-ordinator a written response to any written evidence on or before May 25, 2026 days after the evidence is received and in accordance with paragraph 26 below.
The parties shall cooperate to prepare a joint document book which shall be shared with the OLT case co-ordinator on or before June 12, 2026.
A person wishing to change written evidence, including witness statements, must make a written motion to the Tribunal. See Rule 10 of the Tribunal’s Rules with respect to Motions, which requires that the moving party provide copies of the motion to all other parties 15 days before the Tribunal hears the motion.
A party who provides written evidence of a witness to the other parties must have the witness attend the hearing to give oral evidence, unless the party notifies the Tribunal at least 7 days before the hearing that the written evidence is not part of their record.
The parties shall prepare and file a preliminary hearing plan with the Tribunal on or before June 15, 2026 with a proposed schedule for the hearing that identifies, as a minimum, the parties participating in the hearing, the preliminary matters (if any to be addressed), the anticipated order of evidence, the date each witness is expected to attend, the anticipated length of time for evidence to be presented by each witness in chief, cross-examination and re-examination (if any) and the expected length of time for final submissions. The parties are expected to ensure that the hearing proceeds in an efficient manner and in accordance with the hearing plan. The Tribunal may, at its discretion, change or alter the hearing plan at any time in the course of the hearing.
All filings shall be submitted electronically and in hard copy. Electronic copies may be filed by email, an electronic file sharing service for documents that exceed 10MB in size, or as otherwise directed by the Tribunal. The delivery of documents by email shall be governed by the Rule 7.
No adjournments or delays will be granted before or during the hearing except for serious hardship or illness, and except as contemplated in paragraph 11 of this Order. The Tribunal’s Rule 17 applies to such requests.
The purpose of this Procedural Order and the meaning of the terms used in this Procedural Order are set out in Attachment 5.
This Member is [not] seized.
So orders the Tribunal.
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF DATES
DATE
EVENT
February 23, 2026
Deadline to provide revised plans
April 3, 2026
Exchange of witness lists (names, disciplines and order to be called)
April 13, 2026
Experts meeting prior to this date, if any
April 23, 2026
Agreed Statement of Facts, if any
May 8, 2026
Exchange of Witness Statements, summoned witness outlines, Expert Reports and Participant Statements
May 25, 2026
Exchange of Reply Witness Statements (if any)
May 18, 2026
Confirm if reserved hearing dates still required
June 12, 2026
Exchange of visual evidence (if any)
June 12, 2026
Finalize Joint Document Book
June 15, 2026
Hearing Plan filed with the Tribunal
June 22, 2026
Hearing commences
ATTACHMENT 2
LIST OF PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
PARTIES:
- Toronto Catholic District School Board
Miller Thomson LLP Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West, Suite 6600 Toronto, ON M5H 3S1
Tara L. Piurko
Tel: 416.595.2647
Email: tpiurko@millerthomson.ca
- 1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc. & Biercap O’Connor Eglinton Inc.
Goodmans LLP
333 Bay Street, Suite 3400
Toronto, ON M5H 2S7
Joe Hoffman
Tel: 416.597.5168
Email: jhoffman@goodmans.ca
- City of Toronto
55 John Street, 26th Floor
Toronto, ON M5V 3C6
Amrit Sandhu
Tel: 416.338.1617
Email: amrit.sandhu@toronto.ca
PARTICIPANTS:
- Bob Murphy 437-227-6775
ATTACHMENT 3
ISSUES LIST
NOTE: The identification of an issue on the Issues List does not constitute an acknowledgement by the OLT or any party that such issue, or the manner in which the issue is expressed, is either appropriate or relevant to the determination of the OLT at the hearing. The extent to which these issues are appropriate or relevant to the determination of the OLT at the hearing may be discussed prior to, or be a matter of evidence and argument at the hearing. The identification of an issue on this list by a party indicates that party’s intent to lead evidence or argue that the issue is relevant to the proceeding, for the purpose of fairly identifying to the other parties the case they need to meet and shall not be construed as the OLT having jurisdiction over such matters in each circumstance. Accordingly, no party shall advance an issue not identified on the Issues List without leave of the OLT.
A. Toronto Catholic District School Board For the properties 1675-1685 Eglinton Avenue West and 1711 - 1741 Eglinton Avenue West
Do the tower, podium and rear property line setbacks of the proposed development provide adequate and appropriate separation distances from TCDSB’s St. Thomas Aquinas Catholic School (“School”), having appropriate regard for the adjacent Neighbourhood?
Does the proposed development conform to the Official Plan policies under SASP 477 e) ii) that requires development to “provide appropriate transition in scale between new development and existing nearby Neighbourhoods”?
Does the proposed development conform to the Official Plan Development Criteria in Mixed Use Areas under policy 4.5.2 c) that states that in Mixed Use Areas, development will “locate and mass new buildings to provide a transition between areas of different development intensity and scale, as necessary to achieve the objectives of this Plan, through means such as providing appropriate setbacks and/or a stepping down of heights, particularly towards lower scale Neighbourhoods”?
Does the proposed 3-level underground parking garage provide adequate and appropriate separation and setbacks from the School?
Does the proposed development conform with the built form policies of the City of Toronto Official Plan, including policies intended to ensure that new developments limit adverse impacts on neighbouring properties and considerations related to privacy, overlook and access to light for the adjacent sensitive land use?
Do the immediate adjacencies of the developments, and the resulting increase in traffic volume and congestion, pose risks to the TCDSB’s ability to maintain safe and effective operations, including by introducing traffic hazards that could endanger students, staff, and visitors in and around the School and the School yard?
Does the proposed development represent good planning having regard to the adjacent sensitive land use?
ATTACHMENT 4
ORDER OF EVIDENCE
1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc. & Biercap O’Connor Eglinton Inc.
City of Toronto
Toronto Catholic District School Board
1711-1741 Eglinton Avenue West Inc. & Biercap O’Connor Eglinton Inc. (in reply)
ATTACHMENT 5 PURPOSE OF THE PROCEDURAL ORDER AND MEANING OF TERMS
Meaning of terms used in the Procedural Order:
A party is an individual or corporation permitted by the Tribunal to participate fully in the hearing by receiving copies of written evidence, presenting witnesses, cross-examining the witnesses of the other parties, and making submissions on all of the evidence. An unincorporated group cannot be a party and it must appoint one person to speak for it, and that person must accept the other responsibilities of a party as set out in the Order. Parties do not have to be represented by a lawyer and may have an agent speak for them. The agent must have written authorisation from the party.
NOTE that a person who wishes to become a party before or at the hearing, and who did not request this at the case management conference (CMC), must ask the Tribunal to permit this.
A participant is an individual or corporation, whether represented by a lawyer or not, who may make a written submission to the Tribunal. A participant cannot make an oral submission to the Tribunal or present oral evidence (testify in-person) at the hearing (only a party may do so). Section 17 of the Ontario Land Tribunal Act states that a person who is not a party to a proceeding may only make a submission to the Tribunal in writing. The Tribunal may direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions from the Tribunal on the content of their written submission, should that be found necessary by the Tribunal. A participant may also be asked questions by the parties should the Tribunal direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions on the content of their written submission.
A participant must be identified and be accorded participant status by the Tribunal at the CMC. A participant will not receive notice of conference calls on procedural issues that may be scheduled prior to the hearing, nor receive notice of mediation. A participant cannot ask for costs, or review of a decision, as a participant does not have the rights of a party to make such requests of the Tribunal.
Written evidence includes all written material, reports, studies, documents, letters and witness statements which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing. These must have pages numbered consecutively throughout the entire document, even if there are tabs or dividers in the material.
Visual evidence includes photographs, maps, videos, models, and overlays which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing.
A witness statement is a short written outline of the person’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a list of the issues which he or she will discuss; and a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing.
An expert witness statement should include his or her (1) name and address, (2) qualifications, (3) a list of the issues he or she will address, (4) the witness’ opinions on those issues and the complete reasons supporting their opinions and conclusions and (5) a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing. An expert witness statement must be accompanied by an acknowledgement of expert’s duty.
A participant statement is a short written outline of the person’s or group’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a statement of the participant’s position on the appeal; a list of the issues which the participant wishes to address and the submissions of the participant on those issues; and a list of reports or materials, if any, which the participant wishes to refer to in their statement.
Additional Information
A summons may compel the appearance of a person before the Tribunal who has not agreed to appear as a witness. A party must ask a Tribunal Member or the senior staff of the Tribunal to issue a summons through a request. (See Rule 13 on the summons procedure.) The request should indicate how the witness’ evidence is relevant to the hearing. If the Tribunal is not satisfied from the information provided in the request that the evidence is relevant, necessary or admissible, the party requesting the summons may provide a further request with more detail or bring a motion in accordance with the Rules.
The order of examination of witnesses is usually direct examination, cross-examination and re-examination in the following way:
- direct examination by the party presenting the witness;
- direct examination by any party of similar interest, in the manner determined by the Tribunal;
- cross-examination by parties of opposite interest;
- re-examination by the party presenting the witness; or
- another order of examination mutually agreed among the parties or directed by the Tribunal.
1405-4537-5002