Ontario Land Tribunal
Tribunal ontarien de l’aménagement du territoire
ISSUE DATE:
July 22, 2024
CASE NO(S).:
OLT-22-002465 Formerly PL130592
PROCCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Appellant(s):
Multiple Appellants
Subject:
By-law No. 569-2013
Municipality:
City of Toronto
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002465
Legacy Case No.:
PL130592
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002465
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL130592
OLT Case Name:
Bahardoust v. Toronto (City)
Heard:
May 7, 2024 by Video Hearing
APPEARANCES:
Parties
Counsel
City of Toronto
Marc Hardiejowski Gabe Szobel Amrit Sandhu Caroline Samuel (in absentia)
The International Group, Inc., Canadian Propane Association, Atlantic Packaging Products Ltd., and 217 Adelaide Holdings Limited
Calvin Lantz Jonathan Cheng (in absentia)
Lawrence Square
Matt Rutledge Joel Farber (in absentia)
Morguard Investments Limited, 60 Bloor Equities Inc., and Revenue Properties Company Limited
Johanna Shapira Eugenia Bashura (in absentia)
Silvercore Properties Inc., Harry Klaczkowski, St. Michael's Hospital, and York University
Jamie Cole Cynthia MacDougall (in absentia)
The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada, and Christian Horizons
Max Reedijk Joseph Debono (in absentia)
Toronto Catholic District School Board, and Catholic Cemeteries & Funeral Services – Archdiocese of Toronto
Steven O’Melia Thomas Sanderson (in absentia)
Mondelez Canada Inc.
Mithea Murugesu Kim Mullin (in absentia)
Toronto District School Board
Bruce Engell
Arrowdale Development Ltd., Arrowdale In Trust, and Loring Development Ltd.
Sidonia Tomasella
Brovi Investments Limited
Patrick Harrington
Please refer to Attachment 1 for full list of Parties and those granted Party status
MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY C.I. MOLINARI and N. ALLAM ON may 7, 2024 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL
Link to Order
INTRODUCTION
1This Decision and Order arises from a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) held on May 7, 2024 to provide the Tribunal with a further update on the remaining appeals to the City of Toronto (“City”) comprehensive Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 (“ZBL 569”) regarding the Phase 7 appeals, various topic- and site-specific appeals, the resolution of various appeals, and to determine the next steps following the CMC.
2In advance of the CMC, the City submitted an agenda containing updates on the Appeals, as well as an Appeal tracking table (an updated version is appended as Attachment 1 to this Decision), and at the CMC, Mr. Hardiejowski provided a status update as summarized below. The Appeal tracking table, as submitted, was marked as Exhibit 1.
3The City also provided an update on appeals against ZBL 579 that have been withdrawn, but as they are not related to the Appeals against ZBL 569, they are not addressed in this Decision.
4With respect to the Parties in attendance at the present CMC but not listed in the Appearances, including Plaza Corp. Investments Limited and Helmsbridge Holdings Inc. represented by Michael Cook (with co-counsel Mark Flowers in absentia), it is