Ontario Land Tribunal
Tribunal ontarien de l’aménagement du territoire
ISSUE DATE:
April 12, 2023
CASE NO(S).:
OLT-21-001787
(Formerly PL111184)
OLT-22-002335
(Formerly PL200260)
OLT-22-002358
(Formerly PL200473)
OLT-22-002340
(Formerly PL210178)
OLT-22-002164
(Formerly PL210178)
OLT-21-001218
(Formerly PL210333)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(40) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Appellant:
1042710 Ontario Limited (aka Royal Centre)
Appellant:
1096818 Ontario Inc.
Appellant:
11333 Dufferin St et al
Appellant:
1191621 Ontario Inc.; and others
Subject:
Failure to announce a decision respecting Proposed New Official Plan
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001787
Legacy Case No.:
PL111184
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-21-001787
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL111184
OLT Case Name:
Duca v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Yonge & Steeles Development Inc.
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
General Commercial Area
Proposed Designated:
General Commercial Area – Site Specific
Purpose:
To permit the existing commercial uses to continue and permits retail stores, restaurants, banks and business and professional offices, retail and hotel uses
Property Address/Description:
7028 Yonge Street & 2 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.18.016
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002335
Legacy Case No.:
PL200260
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002335
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200260
OLT Case Name:
Yonge & Steeles Development Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Yonge & Steeles Development Inc.
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88 - Refusal or neglect of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
C1 Restricted Commercial Zone subject to site-specific Exceptions 9(865) and 9(331)
Proposed Zoning:
RA3 Residential Apartment Zone and to permit site-specific zoning exceptions
Purpose:
To permit the existing commercial uses to continue and permits retail stores, restaurants, banks and business and professional offices, retail and hotel uses
Property Address/Description:
7028 Yonge Street & 2 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
Z.18.028
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002338
Legacy Case No.:
PL200261
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002335
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200260
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of the City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
“General Commercial” and “Low Density Residential” in accordance with Official Plan Amendment No. 210 (OPA 210), the Thornhill-Vaughan Community Plan
Proposed Designated:
“Mixed Commercial and Residential”
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.001
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Case No.:
PL200473
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200473
OLT Case Name:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88, as amended - Neglect of the City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
“C2 General Commercial Zone”; subject to Exception 9(731)
Proposed Zoning:
“RA3 Apartment Residential Zone”; subject to Exception 9(xxx)
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
Z.20.004
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002359
Legacy Case No.:
PL200474
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200473
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of the City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
“General Commercial” and “Low Density Residential” in accordance with Official Plan Amendment No. 210 (OPA 210), the Thornhill-Vaughan Community Plan
Proposed Designated:
“Mixed Commercial and Residential”
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.001
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Case No.:
PL200473
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200473
OLT Case Name:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88, as amended - Neglect of the City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
“C2 General Commercial Zone”; subject to Exception 9(731)
Proposed Zoning:
“RA3 Apartment Residential Zone”; subject to Exception 9(xxx)
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
Z.20.004
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002359
Legacy Case No.:
PL200474
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200473
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 51(34) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Proposed Plan of Subdivision - Failure of the City of Vaughan to make a decision
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
19T-20V001
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002360
Legacy Case No.:
PL200475
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200473
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. Et Al
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
General Commercial Area and Low Density Residential
Proposed Designated:
Mixed Commercial/Residential Area
Purpose:
To permit 6, mixed-use residential apartment buildings
Property Address/Description:
180 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.002
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Case No.:
PL210178
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL210178
OLT Case Name:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. Et Al
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88 - Refusal or neglect of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
C4 Neighbourhood Commercial Zone
Proposed Zoning:
RA3 Apartment Residential Zone
Purpose:
To permit 6, mixed-use residential apartment buildings
Property Address/Description:
180 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
Z.20.005
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002341
Legacy Case No.:
PL210180
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL210178
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. Et Al
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
General Commercial Area and Low Density Residential
Proposed Designated:
Mixed Commercial/Residential Area
Purpose:
To permit 6, mixed-use residential apartment buildings
Property Address/Description:
180 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.002
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Case No.:
PL210178
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL210178
OLT Case Name:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. Et Al
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88 - Refusal or neglect of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
C4 Neighbourhood Commercial Zone
Proposed Zoning:
RA3 Apartment Residential Zone
Purpose:
To permit 6, mixed-use residential apartment buildings
Property Address/Description:
180 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
Z.20.005
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002341
Legacy Case No.:
PL210180
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL210178
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Eastwood Holdings Corp.
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
High Density Residential/Commercial
Proposed Designated:
High Rise Residential
Purpose:
To permit two residential towers
Property Address/Description:
9291 Jane Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.017
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002164
Legacy Case No.:
PL210333
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002164
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL210333
OLT Case Name:
Eastwood Holdings Corp. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Eastwood Holdings Corp.
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88 - Refusal or neglect of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
Restricted Commercial" with a holding provision C1(H)
Proposed Zoning:
Residential Apartment Zone 3" (RA3)
Purpose:
To permit two residential towers
Property Address/Description:
9291 Jane Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
Z.20.044
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002166
Legacy Case No.:
PL210334
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002164
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL210333
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(40) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
72 Steeles Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
General Commercial
Proposed Designated:
Mixed Use – Residential and Commercial
Purpose:
To permit the development of high density, mixed-use development
Property Address/Description:
72 Steeles Avenue West and 7040/7054 Yonge Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.014
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT File No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT Case Name:
72 Steeles Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
72 Steeles Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88 - Refusal or neglect of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
C1 Restricted Commercial Zone
Proposed Zoning:
RA3 Apartment Residential Zone with site specific exceptions
Purpose:
To permit the development of high density, mixed-use development
Property Address/Description:
72 Steeles Avenue West and 7040/7054 Yonge Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
Z.20.038
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT File No.:
OLT-21-001219
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 51(34) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
72 Steeles Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited
Subject:
Proposed Plan of Subdivision - Failure of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Purpose:
To permit the development of high density, mixed-use development
Property Address/Description:
72 Steeles Avenue West and 7040/7054 Yonge Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Municipality File No.:
19T-20V007
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT File No.:
OLT-21-001220
Heard:
March 31, 2023 by video hearing
APPEARANCES:
As listed in Attachment 1
MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY S. TOUSAW AND G.A. CROSER ON MARCH 31, 2023 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL
Introduction
1This further Case Management Conference (“CMC”) was convened for the remaining appeals to the 2010 Vaughan Official Plan (“VOP”) and appeals of site-specific development applications being heard together with certain VOP appeals.
2This CMC had been scheduled for Monday, March 27, 2023, but on consent of all Parties, was deferred four days, to March 31, 2023, in place of a VOP appeal hearing that had been adjourned as noted below. The City of Vaughan (“City”) had provided notification to all Parties of the revised CMC date.
Yonge-Steeles Corridor Secondary Plan (“YSCSP”)
3Prior to the four-day Phase 3 Hearing for the YSCSP, scheduled for March 28, 2023, the Tribunal had granted the Parties’ request for rescheduling the hearing to allow further settlement discussions to occur. The Phase 3 Hearing is now scheduled as noted below. The Tribunal directed the Parties to file a final Procedural Order (“PO”) for the hearing within five days of this CMC. Ira Kagan advised that he would circulate the final PO to all Parties and file the PO with the Tribunal as directed. The PO, now contained in Attachment 2 to this Decision, is approved. The Tribunal further directed the Parties to advise the Tribunal at least 35 days in advance of the new hearing date as to whether all scheduled days remain necessary. Vice-Chair S. Tousaw remains seized for this Phase 3 Hearing. No further Notice will be given.
4Monday, August 21, 2023, 10 a.m. for five days
GoTo Meeting: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/765631861
Access code: 765-631-861
Audio-only telephone line: +1 (647) 497-9373 or Toll Free 1 (888) 299-1889
Audio-only access code: 765-631-861
5Please refer to paragraphs [12] to [15] for hearing instructions.
61306497 Ontario Inc. (Sisley Honda) of 88 Steeles Avenue West (“Sisley”) requested that its appeals to the City’s absence of decision on applications for Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) and Zoning By-law Amendment (“ZBA”) be heard together with the YSCSP and related appeals at the Phase 3 Hearing. Sisley submits that its property and proposed development are adjacent and similar to other Appellants’ lands within the YSCSP, and that the commonality of issues being heard should trump other requirements. Sisley is prepared to follow standard Notice procedures under the direction of the Tribunal, but requests that a CMC, if required, be conducted before the commencement of the Phase 3 Hearing.
7The City and the Appellants within the YSCSP oppose the request. They submit that, like all other related appeals that exist within the YSCSP area, site-specific matters should follow the standard process of a CMC to: ensure fair notice; consider Parties and Participants; prepare a PO with detailed Issues List (“IL”); and determine how best to proceed to a hearing on the merits.
8The Panel adjourned to discuss the issue and returned to the CMC to advise Sisley that its request was denied.
9First, the Panel found that due process for an appeal requires Notice to ensure that any interested persons are considered for Party or Participant status, and matters of mediation, IL and PO are addressed. The Tribunal directed Sisley to pursue a separate CMC with the Case Coordinator and that its appeal would unfold in the normal course.
10Second, the Tribunal agreed with the Parties in opposition to the request, that, at this time, it is not appropriate to join Sisley’s necessary CMC with the YSCSP Phase 3 hearing. As the YSCSP Phase 3 hearing process is at an advanced stage with a finalized PO, it is unknown if an additional party could be accommodated within the limited scheduled number of days for the hearing on the merits.
Remaining Appeals
11The other remaining appeals to the VOP continue in discussion among the Parties, and the Parties will keep the Tribunal apprised of their status through the Case Coordinator and at the next CMC.
Next CMC
12The next CMC for the remaining VOP appeals is scheduled as follows. No further Notice will be given. The Panel is not seized.
Tuesday, October 3, 2023, 10 a.m.
GoTo Meeting: https://meet.goto.com/558205565
Audio-only telephone line: +1 (647) 497-9373 or Toll Free 1 (888) 299-1889
Access code: 558-205-565
13Statutory Parties and anyone seeking Party or Participant status are asked to log into the video hearing at least 15 minutes before the start of the event to test their video and audio connections.
14Parties and Participants are asked to access and set up the application well in advance of the event to avoid unnecessary delay. The desktop application can be downloaded at GoToMeeting or a web application is available: https://app.gotomeeting.com/home.html
15Persons who experience technical difficulties accessing the GoToMeeting application or who only wish to listen to the event can connect to the event by calling into an audio-only telephone line with the access code provided.
16Individuals are directed to connect to the event on the assigned date at the correct time. It is the responsibility of the persons participating in the CMC hearing by video to ensure that they are properly connected to the event at the correct time. Questions prior to the hearing events may be directed to the Tribunal’s Case Coordinator having carriage of this case.
Order
17The Tribunal Orders the directions and rulings as set out above.
“S. Tousaw”
S. TOUSAW
VICE-CHAIR
“G.A. Croser”
G.A. CROSER
MEMBER
Ontario Land Tribunal
Website: olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248
The Conservation Review Board, the Environmental Review Tribunal, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and the Mining and Lands Tribunal are amalgamated and continued as the Ontario Land Tribunal (“Tribunal”). Any reference to the preceding tribunals or the former Ontario Municipal Board is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal.
ATTACHMENT 1
Vaughan Official Plan 2010 appeals
OLT-21-001787
March 31, 2023 Case Management Conference attendance list
Name
Client Name
Bruce Engell and Effie Lidakis
City of Vaughan
Bola Ogunmefun and Stephen D’Agostino
York Region
Joel Farber and Matthew Rutledge
1306497 Ontario Inc.
Samantha Lampert
Auto Complex Ltd.
Chris Barnett
7040 Yonge Holdings Ltd. and 72 Steeles Holdings Ltd.
David Tang and Jesse White
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto, in Canada
Sidonia Tomasella
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Justin Papazian
1163919 Ontario Limited et al.
Ira Kagan and Sarah Kagan
Yonge Steeles Landowners Group Inc
Patrick Pinho
390 Steeles West Holdings Inc., 398 Steeles Avenue West Inc. and Associated Vaughan Properties Limited
Quinto Annibale
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc.
Andrew Biggart
City of Markham
Matthew Di Vona
Lucia Milani and Rizmi Holdings Ltd.
Donya Yarahmadi
Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP and Longevity Properties Limited
Ian Andres
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
David Bronskill
7080 Yonge Limited
Dennis Wood
Morguard Investments Limited
Daniel Artenosi and Natalie Ast
Yonge & Steeles Developments Inc.
ATTACHMENT 2
ISSUE DATE: April 12, 2023 CASE NO(S).: OLT-21-001787
(Formerly PL111184)
OLT-22-002335
(Formerly PL200260)
OLT-22-002358
(Formerly PL200473)
OLT-22-002340
(Formerly PL210178)
OLT-21-001218
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 17(40) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Appellant:
1042710 Ontario Limited (aka Royal Centre)
Appellant:
1096818 Ontario Inc.
Appellant:
11333 Dufferin St et. Al.
Appellant:
1191621 Ontario Inc.; and others
Subject:
Failure to announce a decision respecting Proposed New Official Plan
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001787
Legacy Case No.:
PL111184
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-21-001787
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL111184
OLT Case Name:
Duca v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Yonge & Steeles Development Inc.
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan – Failure of the City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
General Commercial Area
Proposed Designation:
General Commercial Area – Site Specific
Purpose:
To permit the existing commercial uses to continue and permit retail stores, restaurants, banks and businesses and professional offices, retail and hotel uses
Property Address/ Description:
7028 Yonge Street & 2 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.18.016
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002335
Legacy Case No.:
PL200260
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002335
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200260
OLT Case Name:
Yonge & Steeles Development Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Yonge & Steeles Development Inc.
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 1-88 – Refusal or neglect of the City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
C1 Restricted Commercial Zone subject to site=specific Exceptions 9(865) and 9(331)
Proposed Zoning:
RA3 Residential Apartment Zone and to permit site-specific zoning exceptions
Purpose:
To permit the existing commercial uses to continue and permit retail stores, restaurants, banks and businesses and professional offices, retail and hotel uses
Property Address/ Description:
7028 Yonge Street & 2 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
Z.18.028
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002338
Legacy Case No.:
PL200261
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002335
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200260
OLT Case Name:
Yonge & Steeles Development Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan – Failure of the City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
“General Commercial” and “Low Density Residential” in accordance with Official Plan Amendment No. 210 (OPA 210), the Thornhill-Vaughan Community Plan
Proposed Designation:
“Mixed Commercial and Residential”
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/ Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.001
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Case No.:
PL200473
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002358
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200473
OLT Case Name:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law 1-88, as amended – Neglect of the City of Vaughan to make a decision
Existing Zoning:
“C2 General Commercial Zone”; subject to Exception 9(xxx)
Proposed Zoning:
“RA3 Apartment Residential Zone”; subject to Exception 9(xxx)
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/ Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
Z.20.004
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002359
Legacy Case No.:
PL200474
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002359
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200474
OLT Case Name:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 51(34) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc.
Subject:
Proposed Plan of Subdivision – Failure of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Purpose:
To permit the redevelopment of the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing residential and commercial uses
Property Address/ Description:
100 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
19T-20V001
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-0002360
Legacy Case No.:
Pl200475
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-0002360
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL200473
OLT Case Name:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. et. al.
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan – Failure of the City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
General Commercial Area and Low Density Residential
Proposed Designation:
Mixed Commercial/ Residential Area
Purpose:
To permit 6, mixed-use residential apartment buildings
Property Address/ Description:
180 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.002
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Case No.:
PL210178
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL210178
OLT Case Name:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. et. al.
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law 1-88, as amended – Refusal or neglect of the City of Vaughan to make decision
Existing Zoning:
C4 Neighbourhood Commercial Zone
Proposed Zoning:
RA3 Apartment Residential Zone
Purpose:
To permit 6, mixed-use residential apartment buildings
Property Address/ Description:
180 Steeles Avenue West
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
Z.20.005
OLT Case No.:
OLT-22-002341
Legacy Case No.:
PL210180
OLT Lead Case No.:
OLT-22-002340
Legacy Lead Case No.:
PL20178
OLT Case Name:
Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 17(40) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
72 Steeles Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited
Subject:
Request to amend the Official Plan – Failure of the City of Vaughan to adopt the requested amendment
Existing Designation:
General Commercial
Proposed Designation:
Mixed Use – Residential and Commercial
Purpose:
To permit the development of high density, mixed-use development
Property Address/ Description:
72 Steeles Avenue West and 7040/7054 Yonge Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
OP.20.014
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT File No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT Case Name:
72 Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
72 Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited
Subject:
Application to amend Zoning By-law 1-88, as amended – Refusal or neglect of the City of Vaughan to make decision
Existing Zoning:
C1 Restricted Commercial Zone
Proposed Zoning:
RA3 Apartment Residential Zone with site specific exceptions
Purpose:
To permit the development of high density, mixed-use development
Property Address/ Description:
72 Steeles Avenue West and 7040/7054 Yonge Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
Z.20.038
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT File No.:
OLT-22-001219
OLT Case Name:
72 Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited v. Vaughan (City)
PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 51(34) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended
Applicant and Appellant:
72 Holdings Limited and 7040 Yonge Holdings Limited
Subject:
Proposed Plan of Subdivision – Failure of City of Vaughan to make a decision
Purpose:
To permit the development of high density, mixed-use development
Property Address/ Description:
72 Steeles Avenue West and 7040/7054 Yonge Street
Municipality:
City of Vaughan
Approval Authority File No.:
19T-20V007
OLT Case No.:
OLT-21-001218
OLT File No.:
OLT-22-001220
OLT Case Name:
Development Group (100 SAW) Inc. v. Vaughan (City)
- The Tribunal may vary or add to the directions in this procedural order at any time by an oral ruling or by another written order, either on the parties’ request or its own motion.
Organization of the Hearing
- The video hearing will begin on Monday, August 21, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Parties and participants are to log onto the following link below:
GoTo Meeting: https://global.gotomeeting.com/joi
Access code: 765-631-861
The parties’ initial estimation for the length of the hearing is five days. The parties are expected to cooperate to reduce the length of the hearing by eliminating redundant evidence and attempting to reach settlements on issues where possible.
The parties identified at the case management conference are set out in Attachment #2 (see the sample procedural order for the meaning of these terms).
The issues are set out in the Issues List attached as Attachment #3. There will be no changes to this list unless the Tribunal permits, and a party who asks for changes may have costs awarded against it.
The order of evidence shall be as set out in Attachment #4 to this Order. The Tribunal may limit the amount of time allocated for opening statements, evidence in chief (including the qualification of witnesses), cross-examination, evidence in reply and final argument. The length of written argument, if any, may be limited either on the parties’ consent, subject to the Tribunal’s approval, or by Order of the Tribunal.
Any person intending to participate in the hearing should provide a mailing address, email address and a telephone number to the Tribunal as soon as possible – ideally before the case management conference. Any person who will be retaining a representative should advise the other parties and the Tribunal of the representative’s name, address, email address and the phone number as soon as possible.
Any person who intends to participate in the hearing, including parties, counsel and witnesses, is expected to review the Tribunal’s Video Hearing Guide, available on the Tribunal’s website.
Requirements Before the Hearing
On or before Wednesday May 31, 2023 the City and YSLOG shall provide all parties with its proposed modifications to Secondary Plan policies 5.8 and 8.4. On or before Wednesday May 31, 2023 Gupta, Humbold, Dream and Mizrahi shall provide all parties with their proposed site-specific zoning by-law amendment and subdivisions/conditions of approval (where applicable).
On of before Friday June 9, 2023 the parties shall advise each other of any issues or concerns that they have with the proposed modifications to policies 5.8 and 8.4, to the site-specific zoning by-law amendments, and/or to the proposed plans of subdivision/conditions of approval.
Expert witnesses in the same field shall have a meeting by Friday, June 23, 2023 and use best efforts to try to resolve or reduce the issues for the hearing. Following the experts’ meeting the parties must prepare and file a Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues with the OLT case co-ordinator by Monday, July 3, 2023.
On or before Friday, July 7, 2023, the parties shall provide copies of any supplementary [witness and] expert witness statements to the other parties and to the OLT case co-ordinator and in accordance with paragraph 18 below.
On or before Monday, August 7, 2023 the parties shall confirm with the Tribunal if all the reserved hearing dates are still required.
On or before Friday, August 11, 2023, the parties shall provide copies of their visual evidence to all of the other parties in accordance with paragraph 20 below. If a model will be used, all parties must have a reasonable opportunity to view it before the hearing.
On or before Friday, July 28, 2023, parties shall provide copies of the Reply Witness Statements, if any, to the other parties and the OLT case co-ordinator and in accordance with paragraph 18 below.
The parties shall cooperate to prepare a joint document book which shall be shared with the OLT case co-ordinator on or before Monday, August 14, 2023.
A person wishing to change written evidence, including witness statements, must make a written motion to the Tribunal. See Rule 10 of the Tribunal’s Rules with respect to Motions, which requires that the moving party provide copies of the motion to all other parties 15 days before the Tribunal hears the motion.
A party who provides written evidence of a witness to the other parties must have the witness attend the hearing to give oral evidence, unless the party notifies the Tribunal at least 7 days before the hearing that the written evidence is not part of their record.
The parties shall prepare and file a preliminary hearing plan with the Tribunal on or before Monday, August 14, 2023,with a proposed schedule for the hearing that identifies, as a minimum, the parties participating in the hearing, the preliminary matters (if any to be addressed), the anticipated order of evidence, the date each witness is expected to attend, the anticipated length of time for evidence to be presented by each witness in chief, cross-examination and re-examination (if any) and the expected length of time for final submissions. The parties are expected to ensure that the hearing proceeds in an efficient manner and in accordance with the hearing plan. The Tribunal may, at its discretion, change or alter the hearing plan at any time in the course of the hearing.
All filings shall be submitted electronically and in hard copy. Electronic copies may be filed by email, an electronic file sharing service for documents that exceed 10MB in size, or as otherwise directed by the Tribunal. The delivery of documents by email shall be governed by the Rule 7.
No adjournments or delays will be granted before or during the hearing except for serious hardship or illness. The Tribunal’s Rule 17 applies to such requests.
This Member is seized.
So orders the Tribunal.
BEFORE:
Name of Member:
Date:
TRIBUNAL REGISTRAR
ATTACHMENT #1
Meaning of terms used in the Procedural Order
A party is an individual or corporation permitted by the Tribunal to participate fully in the hearing by receiving copies of written evidence, presenting witnesses, cross-examining the witnesses of the other parties, and making submissions on all of the evidence. An unincorporated group cannot be a party and it must appoint one person to speak for it, and that person must accept the other responsibilities of a party as set out in the Order. Parties do not have to be represented by a lawyer and may have an agent speak for them. The agent must have written authorisation from the party.
NOTE that a person who wishes to become a party before or at the hearing, and who did not request this at the case management conference (CMC), must ask the Tribunal to permit this.
A participant is an individual or corporation, whether represented by a lawyer or not, who may make a written submission to the Tribunal. A participant cannot make an oral submission to the Tribunal or present oral evidence (testify in-person) at the hearing (only a party may do so). Section 17 of the Ontario Land Tribunal Act states that a person who is not a party to a proceeding may only make a submission to the Tribunal in writing. The Tribunal may direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions from the Tribunal on the content of their written submission, should that be found necessary by the Tribunal. A participant may also be asked questions by the parties should the Tribunal direct a participant to attend a hearing to answer questions on the content of their written submission.
A participant must be identified and be accorded participant status by the Tribunal at the CMC. A participant will not receive notice of conference calls on procedural issues that may be scheduled prior to the hearing, nor receive notice of mediation. A participant cannot ask for costs, or review of a decision, as a participant does not have the rights of a party to make such requests of the Tribunal.
Written evidence includes all written material, reports, studies, documents, letters and witness statements which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing. These must have pages numbered consecutively throughout the entire document, even if there are tabs or dividers in the material.
Visual evidence includes photographs, maps, videos, models, and overlays which a party or participant intends to present as evidence at the hearing.
A witness statement is a short written outline of the person’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a list of the issues which he or she will discuss ; and a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing.
An expert witness statement should include his or her (1) name and address, (2) qualifications, (3) a list of the issues he or she will address, (4) the witness’ opinions on those issues and the complete reasons supporting their opinions and conclusions and (5) a list of reports or materials that the witness will rely on at the hearing. An expert witness statement must be accompanied by an acknowledgement of expert’s duty.
A participant statement is a short written outline of the person’s or group’s background, experience and interest in the matter; a statement of the participant’s position on the appeal; a list of the issues which the participant wishes to address and the submissions of the participant on those issues; and a list of reports or materials, if any, which the participant wishes to refer to in their statement.
Additional Information
A summons may compel the appearance of a person before the Tribunal who has not agreed to appear as a witness. A party must ask a Tribunal Member or the senior staff of the Tribunal to issue a summons through a request. (See Rule 13 on the summons procedure.) The request should indicate how the witness’ evidence is relevant to the hearing. If the Tribunal is not satisfied from the information provided in the request that the evidence is relevant, necessary or admissible, the party requesting the summons may provide a further request with more detail or bring a motion in accordance with the Rules.
The order of examination of witnesses is usually direct examination, cross-examination and re-examination in the following way:
direct examination by the party presenting the witness;
direct examination by any party of similar interest, in the manner determined by the Tribunal;
cross-examination by parties of opposite interest;
re-examination by the party presenting the witness; or
another order of examination mutually agreed among the parties or directed by the Tribunal.
ATTACHMENT #2
PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
PARTIES
- Yonge Steeles Landowners Group Inc.
Ira T. Kagan, Kristie M. Stitt & Sarah R. Kagan
Kagan Shastri DeMelo Winer Park LLP
188 Avenue Road
Toronto, ON M5R 2J1
Tel: 416-368-2100 x226/244/ 243
Email: ikagan@ksllp.ca / kstitt@ksllp.ca /skagan@ksllp.ca
Jason Park
Kagan Shastri DeMelo Winer Park LLP
250 Yonge Street
Suite 2302, P.O Box 65
Toronto, On M5B 2L7
Tel: 416-645-4572
Email: jpark@ksllp.ca
- City of Vaughan
Bruce Engell,
WeirFoulds LLP
66 Wellington Street West
TD Bank Tower, Suite 4100
Toronto, Ontario, M5K 1B7
Tel: 416-947-5081
Email: bengell@weirdfoulds.com
Effie Lidakis
City of Vaughan
2141 Major Mackenzie Drive
Vaughan, ON L6A 1T1
Tel: 905 832-8565 x8851
Email: Effie.lidakis@vaughan.ca
- Regional Municipality of York
Stephen J. D’Agostino
Thomson Rogers
390 Bay Street, Suite 3100
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1W2
Tel: 416-868-3126
Email: sdagostino@thomsonrogers.com
Bola Ogunmefun
The Regional Municipality of York
Legal & Court Services Department
17250 Yonge Street, 4th Floor
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 6Z1
Tel: 1(877)-464-9675
Email: bola.ogunmefun@york.ca
- 7040 Yonge Holdings Ltd. & 72 Steeles Holdings Ltd.
Chris Barnett
Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
100 King Street West
1 First Canadian Place
Suite 6200, P.O Box 50
Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1B8
Tel: 416-862-6651
Email: cbarnett@osler.com
- Yonge & Steeles Developments Inc.
Daniel Artenosi & Natalie Ast
Overland LLP
1101- 5255 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 6P4
Tel: 416-730-0028 / 416-730-0387
Email:dartenosi@overlandllp.ca/ nast@overlandllp.ca
- Development Group (100 SAW) Inc. (Salz & Son Ltd.)
Tom Halinski & Sidonia Tomasella
Aird & Berlis LLP
181 Bay Street, Suite 1800
Brookfield Place
Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2T9
Tel: 416-865-7767/416-865-7763
Email: thalinkski@airdberlis.com / stomasella@airdberlis.com
- Mizrahi Constantine (180 SAW) Inc.
Quinto Annibale & Brendan Ruddick
Loopstra Nixon LLP
135 Queens Plate Drive, Suite 600
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 6V7
Tel: 416-748-4757/ 416-748-5126
Email: qanninale@loonix.com / bruddick@loonix.com
- 1163919 Ontario Limited, 1888836 Ontario Limited, 1211612 Ontario Limited, 1973280 Ontario Limited, 1219414 Ontario Limited
Alan Heisey
Papazian Hesiey Myers
121 King Street West, Suite 510
Standard Life Centre, P.O Box 105
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3T9
Tel: 416-601-2702
Email: hesiey@phmlaw.com
- Auto Complex Ltd.
Susan Rosenthal
Samantha Lampert
Davies Howe LLP
425 Adelaide Street West, 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 3C1
Tel: 416-263-4518
Email: SusanR@davieshowe.com / SamanthaL@davieshowe.com
- 1306497 Ontario Inc. (Sisley Honda)
Joel Farber & Matthew Rutledge
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
77 King Street West, Suite 3000
North Tower, TD Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5K 1G8
Tel: 416-365-2707 / 416-864-7607
Email: jfarber@foglers.com / mrutledge@foglers.com
- 390 Steeles West Holdings Inc., 398 Steeles Avenue West Inc. & Associated Vaughan Properties Limited.
Mary Flynn- Guglietti & Kailey Sutton
McMillan LLP
181 Bay Street, Suite 4400
Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2T3
Tel: 416-865-7256/416-945-8008
Email: mary.flynn-guglietti@mcmillan.ca / Kailey.sutton@mcmillan.ca
- 7080 Yonge Limited (Tan-Mark Holdings Limited & Telast Enterprises Inc.)
David Bronskill
Goodmans LLP
Bay Adelaide Centre – West Tower
333 Bay Street, Suite 3400
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2S7
Tel: 416-597-4299
Email: dbronskill@goodmans.ca
- City of Toronto
Ray Kallio & Adam Ward
City of Toronto
55 John Street
Metro Hall, 26th Floor
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 3C6
Tel: 416-397-4063/416-394-2787
Email: ray.kallio@torotno.ca / Adam.Ward@toronto.ca
- City of Markham
Andrew Biggart & Tina Kapelos
Ritchie Ketcheson Hart & Biggart LLP
206- 1 Eva Road
Toronto, Ontario, M9C 4Z5
Tel: 416-622-6601
Email: abiggart@ritchieketcheson.com / tkapelos@ritchieketcheson.com
Victoria Chai
City of Markham
101 Town Centre Boulevard
Markham, Ontario, L3R 9W3
Tel: 905-477-7000 x3583
Email: vchai@markham.ca
- Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited [Toys’ R Us (Canada) Ltd.]
Roslyn Houser & Ian Andres
Goodmans LLP
333 Bay Street, Suite 3400
Bay Adelaide Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2S7
Tel: 416-597-4119/ 416-597-5160
Email: rhouser@goodmans.ca / iandres@goodmans.ca
- Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto (St. Paschal Baylon Church) & Mercedes Benz of Canada Inc.
David Tang/ Jesse White
Miller Thomson LLP
40 King Street West, Suite 5800
Scotia Plaza, P.O Box 1011
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3S1
Tel: 416-597-6047/ 426-597-6005
Email: dtang@millerthomson.com / tjwhite@millerthomson.com
- Morguard Investments Limited (7120 Yonge Street, 24-26 Crestwood Road & Centerpoint Mall)
Johanna Shapira & Dennis Wood
Wood Bull LLP
65 Queen Street West, Suite 1400
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2M5
Tel: 416-203-5631
Email: jshapira@woodbull.ca / dwood@woodbull.ca
- Longevity Properties Limited
Calvin Lantz & Jonathan Cheng
Stikeman Elliot LLP
5300 Commerce Court West
199 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario, M5L 1B9
Tel: 416-869-5669 / 416-869-6807
Email: clantz@stikeman.com / jcheng@stikeman.com
- Lucia Antinori
Raivo Uukkivi
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
2100 Scotia Plaza
40 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3C2
Tel: 416-860-6613
Email: ruukkivi@cassels.com
ATTACHMENT #3
ISSUES LIST
Policies Deferred in the Yonge Steeles Corridor Secondary Plan [OLT-21-001781]
[BEYOND THE APPELLANTS AND CITY, PARTIES INVOLVED ARE IDENTIFIED IN BRACKETS]
5.8 – Vehicular parking
8.4 – Holding Provisions
The Four Site-Specific Zoning By-law Appeals [OLT-22-002335 (Gupta), OLT-21-001218 (Humbold), OLT-22-002358 (Dream), OLT-22-002340 (Mizrahi) and the Dream (OLT-22-002360) AND Humbold (OLT-21-001220) Subdivisions
The entirety of the site-specific zoning by-law amendments were deferred
The entirety of the Dream and Humbold plans of subdivision were deferred
The parties agree that the only issues for the site-specific hearing of the remaining appeals are those noted below:
o Whether the holding provisions in the by-law should apply to all or part of the property and the contents of the holding provisions [Morguard and Autocomplex]
o Whether the by-law should include the exemption from the 2-year moratorium on minor variance applications [Morguard and Autocomplex]
o Whether the by-law should include the maximum population and minimum job numbers, or be otherwise calculable from the by-law itself by the inclusion of number of units and/or unit mix [Morguard]
o With respect to the road network, does the development permitted by the zoning by-law(s) and the plans of subdivision conform to the YSCSP sections 5.9.2, 5.9.13.2, 5.9.15.3 [Morguard]
o Parking provisions to be included in the by-law, in conjunction with the resolution of Policy 5.8 above
o The final format of the zoning by-laws
Note: NS-2 must continue to conform with policy 5.9.4 [Morguard]
Note 1: Where two or more parties raise the same technical issue, they can co-ordinate and rely upon a qualified independent expert but must call expert evidence in support of that technical issue. Where a single party alone raises a technical issue then that party must call technical evidence in support of that issue from a qualified independent expert.
Note 2: The identification of an issue does not mean that all parties agree that such issue, or the manner in which the issue is expressed, is appropriate or relevant to the determination of the Tribunal at the hearing. The extent to which these issues are appropriate or relevant to the determination of the Tribunal at the hearing will be a matter of evidence and argument at the hearing.
ATTACHMENT #4
ORDER OF EVIDENCE
NOTE: THE ORDER OF EVIDENCE WILL BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE ONCE IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED WHETHER THERE ARE ANY OUTSTANDING ISSUES FOR POLICIES 5.8 AND 8.4 AND THE SITE SPECIFIC ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS.
ATTACHMENT #5
SUMMARY OF FILING DEADLINES
EVENT
DATE
City and YSLOG to file its proposed modifications to policies 5.8 and 8.4
Gupta, Humbold, Dream and Mizrahi to file the proposed site-specific ZBLAs and subdivisions/conditions of approval where applicable.
Wed, May 31, 2023
Parties to advise of concerns/issues with the proposed modifications to policies 5.8 and 8.4.
Parties to advise of concerns/issues with the proposed site-specific ZBLAs and subdivisions/conditions of approval.
Wed, June 14, 2023
Deadline for Expert Meeting
Fri, June 23, 2023
Parties to file Statement of Agreed Facts and Issues
Mon, July 3, 2023
Parties to exchange their Witness and Expert Witness Statements
Fri, July 7, 2023
Parties to exchange their Reply Witness Statements
Fri, July 28, 2023
Parties to confirm if all hearing dates are needed
Mon, August 7, 2023
Parties to exchange their Visual Evidence
Fri, August 11, 2023
Parties to File Preliminary Hearing Plan
Parties to File Joint Document Book
Mon, August 14, 2023
Hearing commences
August 21, 2023