Ontario Land Tribunal

Tribunal ontarien de l’aménagement du territoire

ISSUE DATE: January 21, 2022

CASE NO(S).: PL200364

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant: Transmetro Limited

Subject: Request to amend the Official Plan - Failure of Town of Orangeville to adopt the requested amendment

Existing Designation: Employment Area

Proposed Designated: Site Specific (To be determined)

Purpose: To permit four (4), six (6) storey mixed-use buildings

Property Address/Description: Block 94 & 98, Plan 7M-70

Municipality: Town of Orangeville

Approval Authority File No.: OPZ 3/19

OLT Case No.: PL200364

OLT File No.: PL200364

OLT Case Name: Transmetro Limited v. Orangeville (Town)

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

Applicant and Appellant: Transmetro Limited

Subject: Application to amend Zoning By-law No. 22-90 - Refusal or neglect of Town of Orangeville to make a decision

Existing Zoning: General Industrial Zone (M1)

Proposed Zoning: Site Specific (To be determined)

Purpose: To permit four (4), six (6) storey mixed-use buildings.

Property Address/Description: Block 94 & 98, Plan 7M-70

Municipality: Town of Orangeville

Municipality File No.: OPZ 3/19

OLT Case No.: PL200364

OLT File No.: PL200365

APPEARANCES:

Parties

Counsel

Transmetro Limited and Cachet Developments (Orangeville) Inc.

Marisa Keating

Sarah Properties Ltd.

Mandy Ng

Town of Orangeville

Andrew Biggart

AMENDING DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL DELIVERED BY JATINDER BHULLAR

1In accordance with Rule 24.4 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, whereby the Tribunal may at any time and without prior notice to the parties correct a technical or typographical error made in a decision or order, the Decision and Order (“Decision”) issued on January 6, 2022, is hereby amended.

2By adding the Applicant/Appellant to the Appearances Section to read: “Transmetro Limited and Cachet Developments (Orangeville) Inc.”

3By deleting paragraph [1] from the Decision:

[1] This is a settlement hearing regarding appeals by Transmetro Limited (“Applicant/Appellant”). The two appeals were regarding an Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) and a Zoning By-law Amendment (“ZBA”). Sarah Properties Ltd. is a non-appellant party.

4And replacing it with the following:

[1] This is a settlement hearing regarding appeals by Transmetro Limited and Cachet Developments (Orangeville) Inc. (collectively, the “Applicant/Appellant”). The two appeals were regarding an Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) and a Zoning By-law Amendment (“ZBA”). Sarah Properties Ltd. is a non-appellant party.

5In all other respects the Tribunal’s Decision remains the same.

“Jatinder Bhullar”

JATINDER BHULLAR MEMBER

Ontario Land Tribunal Website: olt.gov.on.ca Telephone: 416-212-6349 Toll Free: 1-866-448-2248

The Conservation Review Board, the Environmental Review Tribunal, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and the Mining and Lands Tribunal are amalgamated and continued as the Ontario Land Tribunal (“Tribunal”). Any reference to the preceding tribunals or the former Ontario Municipal Board is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal.