3661-00-ES Lorraine Douglas, Applicant v. Richard & Shaliza Ramsoomair and Ministry of Labour, Responding Parties.
Employment Practices Branch File No. 41009700
BEFORE: Christopher J. Albertyn, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; July 16, 2001
1. This is an application for review under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.E.14, as amended, (the "Act") of a refusal to issue an order.
2. The employer and employee affected by this application entered into Minutes of Settlement with the assistance of a Labour Relations Officer pursuant to section 69.1 of the Act.
3. The Minutes of Settlement provide:
O.L.R.B. File No. 3661-00-ES
E.P.B. File No. 41009700
In the matter of an application for review under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act R.S.O. 1990 c.E.14 as amended
Between:
Lorraine Douglas – Employee/Applicant
- and -
Richard & Shaliza Ramsoomair – Employer/Responding Party
- and -
Ministry of Labour
MINUTES OF SETTLEMENT
Lorraine Douglas has applied for a review of:
(x) the refusal to issue an order to pay
( ) the amount of Order to Pay No.
dated .
Lorraine Douglas and Richard & Shaliza Ramsoomair agree that the following terms resolve all issues in dispute between them, arising from paragraph 1 above:
(a) As full and final settlement of all claims arising out of the employment relationship, the employer will pay the employee the net sum of $3,000.00 (three thousand) in 6 monthly payments of $500.00 (five hundred) each, commencing July 31, 2001, with the final payment to be made on December 31, 2001. Should the employer default in payments, the employee is entitled to bring the matter back to the board.
As this settlement disposes of all issues in dispute, the parties agree that this application is terminated in accordance with subsection 69.1(5) of the Act.
Signed at Toronto this 11th day of July, 2001.
"illegible signature" . "Lorraine Douglas" .
Employer Employee
4. Section 69.1(2) of the Act provides that the settlement is binding on the parties who entered into it. Should a party bound by the settlement fail to comply with it, a remedy is available under section 69.1(8) of the Act.
5. Pursuant to section 69.1(5) of the Act, this application is terminated.
"Christopher J. Albertyn"
for the Board