2302-01-U Chetan Patel, Applicant v. Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union, Local 264, Responding Party v. Dough Delight Ltd., Intervenor.
BEFORE: Caroline Rowan, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; November 30, 2001
1This is an application under section 96 of the of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the “Act”).
2In his application, the applicant appears to be complaining about the responding party’s refusal to provide him with a written response to his concerns about violations of the collective agreement.
3The responding party and the intervenor have requested that this application be dismissed without a hearing. The intervenor submits that the Board should do so on the basis that the application does not disclose a prima facie case of a violation of section 74 of the Act.
4The applicant is directed to file his submissions in response to these requests with the Board (and copied to the other parties) within five (5) days of the date of this decision. The applicant is also specifically directed to indicate therein which facts pleaded in the union’s response and the employer’s intervention he disputes and to explain why. Any facts, which are not specifically disputed by the applicant, will be deemed to have been accepted by the him.
5The responding party and the intervenor will have a period of two (2) days thereafter to file any reply submissions with the Board.
“Caroline Rowan”
for the Board