Anil Kumar v. C.A.W. #252
0075-01-R Anil Kumar, Applicant v. C.A.W. #252, Responding Party v. Gill Manufacturing Ltd., Intervenor.
BEFORE: Bram Herlich, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members J. A. Ronson and H. Peacock.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; May 9, 2001
1No statement of desire to make representations has been filed with the Board within the time fixed under Rule 62 of the Board's Rules of Procedure following the taking of the representation vote pursuant to the Board's direction of April 11, 2001.
2On the taking of the representation vote directed by the Board, more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were cast in opposition to the responding party.
3The Board declares that the responding party no longer represents the employees of Gill Manufacturing Ltd. for whom it has heretofore been the bargaining agent.
4The Registrar will destroy the ballots cast in the representation vote taken in this matter following the expiration of 30 days from the date of this decision unless a statement requesting that the ballots should not be destroyed is received by the Board from one of the parties before the expiration of such 30 day period.
5Meeting and hearing dates set previously are hereby cancelled.
6The employer is directed to post copies of this decision immediately, adjacent to all copies of the "Notice of Vote and of Hearing" posted previously. These copies must remain posted until the date that had been set for the hearing.
“Bram Herlich”
for the Board