Darcy L. Johnson v. United Steelworkers of America
File No.: 1746-01-U Date: October 30, 2001
Darcy L. Johnson, Applicant v. United Steelworkers of America, Responding Party v. No-Sag Springs Company Ltd., Intervenor.
BEFORE: Caroline Rowan, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD
1This is an application filed under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the "Act"), in which the applicant alleges that the responding party (the "union") violated section 74 of the Act.
2In its response, the union submits that the application fails to make out a prima facie case for the orders and remedies requested and therefore that the application should be dismissed in accordance with Rule 46 of the Board's Rules of Procedure. The union also submits that the application as it relates to a grievance for severance and termination pay is premature and should be dismissed on that basis.
3The applicant is directed to file any submissions in response to these requests within ten (10) days from the date of this decision. The applicant is specifically directed to indicate therein which facts, if any, set out in the union's response and in the employer's intervention he disputes and why. Any facts, which the applicant does not specifically indicate are disputed, will be deemed to have been accepted by him. The union and the employer will have two (2) days thereafter to file any reply submissions.
"Caroline Rowan"
for the Board