1521-01-R Hospitality & Service Trades Union, Local 261, Applicant v. Sodexho Marriott (Que) TD, Responding Party.
BEFORE: Marilyn Silverman, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members J. A. Ronson and
D. A. Patterson.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; August 30, 2001
This is an application for certification.
The Registrar has certified that the applicant had been found to be a trade union in an earlier proceeding under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the “Act”). Therefore, having regard to the Registrar’s certificate and section 113 of the Act, the Board finds that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Act.
It appears to the Board on an examination of only the information provided in the application and the information and membership evidence filed by the applicant (see section 8(3) of the Act), that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the bargaining unit proposed in the application for certification were members of the union at the time the application was made.
The responding party disputes the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the applicant's proposed bargaining unit. However, the responding party agrees with the bargaining unit proposed by the applicant yet it contends that the applicant's bargaining unit could not be appropriate. It gives notice under section 8.1 of the Act but does not provide a list of employees. These circumstances do not constitute a proper notice under section 8.1. The Board finds that the bargaining unit described in the application could be appropriate. In any event, the responding party agreed that the ballots cast in the representation vote should be counted.
The Board directs that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the following voting constituency:
all employees of Sodexho Marriott (Que) TD, located at the Royal Canadian Mint at 320 Sussex Drive, in the City of Ottawa, save and except the Chef Manager, supervisor, any persons above the rank of supervisor and office staff.
The vote will be held on September 4, 2001. Other vote arrangements will be as determined by the Registrar and set out on the attached "Notice of Vote and of Hearing".
All individuals who had an employment relationship with the responding party in the voting constituency on August 27, 2001, the certification application filing date, are eligible to vote. Employees having an employment relationship on August 27, 2001, the certification application filing date, include employees who were not at work on that date, so long as there is a reasonable expectation of their return to employment.
Voters will be asked to indicate whether or not they wish to be represented by the applicant in their employment relations with the responding party.
The responding party is directed to post copies of this decision and of the "Notice of Vote and of Hearing" adjacent to each of the posted copies of the "Notice to Employees of Application for Certification". These copies must remain posted for 30 days.
Any party or person who wishes to make representations to the Board about any issue remaining in dispute which relates to the application for certification, including any matters relating to the representation vote, must file a detailed statement of representations with the Board and deliver it to the other parties, so that it is received by the Board within five days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays on which the Board is closed) of the date on which the vote is taken. Representations with respect to any status dispute must be made in accordance with the directions provided in Information Bulletin No. 4: Status Disputes in Certification Applications (Non-Construction).
The matter is referred to the Registrar.
“Marilyn Silverman”
for the Board