Employees Essroc Italcementi Group v. Teamsters Local 91
2007-01-R Employees Essroc Italcementi Group, Applicant v. Teamsters Local 91, Responding Party v. Essroc Canada Inc., Intervenor.
BEFORE: Harry Freedman, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members G. Pickell and A. Haward.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; October 22, 2001
1The applicant has applied to the Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the “Act”) for a declaration that the responding party no longer represents the employees in a bargaining unit for which it is the bargaining agent.
2This application was fi1ed on October 17, 2001. The employees who are affected by this application are covered by a collective agreement between the responding party and Essroc Canada Inc. with an effective date of December 7, 1998, until December 6, 2001. The bargaining unit description in that collective agreement is as follows:
all employees of Premier Concrete Primeau/Miron, a division of Essroc Canada Inc. employed at or working out of the Township of McNab and Petawawa and the Ashton Plant in the Township of Goulbourn, save and except foremen, those above the rank of foreman, office and sales staff.
Having regard to the provisions of section 63(2) of the Act, the Board finds that this application is timely.
3The responding party and the intervenor were both duly served with the application material on October 17, 2001, according to the Certificate of Delivery filed by the applicant. The intervenor filed its intervention but the responding party failed to file its response with the Board within the time stipulated by Rule 141 of the Board's Rules of Procedure.
4It appears to the Board on an examination of the evidence before it, that not less than forty per cent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union at the time the application was filed.
5The Board directs that a representation vote be taken of the employees of Essroc Canada Inc. employed in the bargaining unit described in paragraph 2 above. All those employed in that bargaining unit and at work on the application filing date will be eligible to vote.
6The vote will be held on October 24, 2001. Vote arrangements are as set out on the attached "Notice of Vote and of Hearing".
7Voters will be asked to indicate whether or not they wish to be represented by the responding party in their employment relations with Essroc Canada Inc.
8The employer is directed to post copies of this decision and of the "Notice of Vote and of Hearing" in a location or locations where they are most likely to come to the attention of those eligible to vote. These copies must remain posted for a period of 30 days.
9Any party or person who wishes to make representations to the Board about any issue remaining in dispute which relates to the application for termination of bargaining rights, other than status disputes, must file a detailed statement of representations with the Board and deliver it to the other parties, so that it is received within five days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays on which the Board is closed) of the date on which the vote is taken. Representations with respect to any status dispute must be made in accordance with the directions provided in Information Bulletin No. 10: Status Disputes in Termination Applications in the Construction Industry.
10The matter is referred to the Registrar.
“Harry Freedman”
for the Board