2633-00-R Teamsters Local Union 91, Applicant v. Glopak Inc., Responding Party v. Union of Employees of Glopak, Intervenor.
BEFORE: Patrick Kelly, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members J. A. Rundle-and R. R. Montague.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; June 20, 2001
No statement of desire to make representations has been filed with the Board within the time fixed under Rule 62 of the Board's Rules of Procedure following the taking of the representation vote pursuant to the Board's direction of May 10, 2001.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board further finds that:
all employees of Glopak Inc. in Eastern Ontario (as defned in the Charter of Teamsters Local Union 91), save and except supervisors, those above the rank of supervisor, office and clerical and sales staff,
constitute a unit of employees of the responding party appropriate for collective bargaining.
On the taking of the representation vote directed by the Board, more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were cast in favour of the applicant.
A certificate will issue to the applicant.
The Registrar will destroy the ballots cast in the representation vote taken in this matter following the expiration of 30 days from the date of this decision unless a statement requesting that the ballots should not be destroyed is received by the Board from one of the parties before the expiration of such 30 day period.
The responding party is directed to post copies of this decision immediately, in a location or locations in the workplace where it is likely to come to the attention of employees affected by the application.
“Patrick Kelly”
for the Board