United Steelworkers of America v. Central Precast Inc.
1528-01-R United Steelworkers of America, Applicant v. Central Precast Inc., Responding Party v. Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 527, Intervenor.
BEFORE: Marilyn Silverman, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members J. A. Ronson and D. A. Patterson.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; August 30, 2001
1This is a displacement application for certification.
2The Registrar has certified that the applicant had been found to be a trade union in an earlier proceeding under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the “Act”). Therefore, having regard to the Registrar’s certificate and section 113 of the Act, the Board finds that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Act.
3The employees are currently represented by the intervenor. No intervention was filed. The Certificate of Delivery certified that the documents were delivered to the intervenor as required by the Board’s Rules of Procedure.
4It appears to the Board on an examination of only the information provided in the application and the information and membership evidence filed by the applicant (see section 8(3) of the Act), that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the bargaining unit proposed in the application for certification were members of the applicant at the time the application was made. Further, this application appears to be timely.
5The Board directs that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the following voting constituency:
all employees of Central Precast Inc. in the City of Ottawa save and except forepersons, persons above the rank of working foreperson, office and sales staff.
6The vote will be held on September 4, 2001. Other vote arrangements will be as determined by the Registrar and set out on the attached "Notice of Vote and of Hearing".
7All individuals who had an employment relationship with the responding party in the voting constituency on August 27, 2001, the certification application filing date, are eligible to vote. Employees having an employment relationship on August 27, 2001, the certification application filing date, include employees who were not at work on that date, so long as there is a reasonable expectation of their return to employment.
8Voters will be asked to indicate whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor in their employment relations with the responding party.
9The responding party is directed to post copies of this decision and of the "Notice of Vote and of Hearing" adjacent to each of the posted copies of the "Notice to Employees of Application for Certification". These copies must remain posted for 30 days.
10Any party or person who wishes to make representations to the Board about any issue remaining in dispute which relates to the application for certification, must file a detailed statement of representations with the Board and deliver it to the other parties, so that it is received by the Board within five days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays on which the Board is closed) of the date on which the vote is taken. Representations with respect to any status dispute must be made in accordance with the directions provided in Information Bulletin No. 4: Status Disputes in Certification Applications (Non-Construction).
11The matter is referred to the Registrar.
“Marilyn Silverman”
for the Board