Ontario Labour Relations Board
0936-00-R International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 786, Applicant v. Briecan Construction Limited; Brie Construction Inc.; Levert Industries Limited; Allaire Mechanical, a division of Clara Holdings (Ontario) Inc., Levert Personnel Resources Inc., Responding Parties v. Northern Ontario Workers’ Association, Intervenor.
1993-99-R Millwright & Machine Erectors Local 1425, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Applicant v. Briecan Construction Limited; Brie Construction Inc.; Levert Industries Limited; Allaire Mechanical, a division of Clara Holdings (Ontario) Inc., Levert Personnel Resources Inc., Responding Parties.
2621-00-R International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1687, Applicant v. Levert Industries Limited, Briecan Construction Limited, Brie Construction Inc., Levert Personnel Resources Inc. and Richard Levert, Responding Parties v. Northern Ontario Workers’ Association, Intervenor.
BEFORE: David A. McKee, Vice-Chair.
APPEARANCES: Frederica Wilson for the Iron Workers, Local 786 and the Millwrights, Local 1425; Carl Peterson for the responding parties; Nick Coleman for Northern Ontario Workers’ Association; Mark Wright for IBEW, Local 1687.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; November 19, 2001
1These matters came on for hearing on November 5 and 6, 2001. There was some discussion about the appropriate names of the parties to the applications in Board Files Nos. 1993‑99-R and 0936-00-R and the request by the applicants to add certain other parties. All parties agreed that the following were the proper responding parties to the applications:
Brie Construction Inc.
Briecan Construction Limited
Levert Industries Limited
Allaire Mechanical, a division of Clara Holdings (Ontario) Inc.
Levert Personnel Resources Inc.
2Mr. Peterson indicated that he had instructions from all of these parties, and did not oppose the additions or changes of name to the two applications. No party opposed the addition of new parties or the correct naming of some of them, and so the above list of corporations are the responding parties for the purposes of these two applications.
3It will be necessary to post a notice to millwrights in the employ of these parties. The responding parties are directed to post the attached notice along with a copy of this decision and the application in a place, consistent with its control of employees’ work environment, where it will most likely come to the attention of millwright employees affected by the application.
4These matters will resume on days to be set by the Registrar in consultation with the parties.
“David A. McKee”
for the Board