The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America

File Nos.: 2645-98-R, 4048-98-R, 4049-98-R, 4050-98-R, 4053-98-R

2645-98-R The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Applicant v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and its Locals and Affiliates, Responding Party.

4048-98-R The Carpenters District Council of Ontario, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Applicant v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank and General Commercial Construction Inc., Responding Parties.

4049-98-R The Carpenters District Council of Ontario, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Applicant v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Hi Tech, Responding Parties.

4050-98-R The Carpenters District Council of Ontario, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Applicant v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank and CH Industries Ltd., Responding Parties.

4053-98-R The Carpenters District Council of Ontario, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Applicant v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Classic Construction Company, Responding Parties.

BEFORE: Mary Ellen Cummings, Alternate Chair, and Board Members J. G. Knight and A. Haward.

DECISION OF THE BOARD; December 18, 2000

The Board’s decision of December 13, 2000 has a mistake in paragraph 53. The last line of the decision should read:

“As of October 16, 2000, the date of the Board’s “bottom line” decision, and in accordance with section 127.2(3), any collective agreement in the construction industry binding the Bank and the applicant, ceases to apply”.

“Mary Ellen Cummings”

for the Board