2984-99-R Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 880, Applicant v. N. Tepperman’s Ltd., Responding Party.
BEFORE: Russell Goodfellow, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members J. A. Rundle and
H. Peacock.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; January 12, 2000
1. This is an application for certification.
2. The Board finds that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
3. Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board further finds that:
all part-time employees of N. Tepperman’s Ltd. in the City of Windsor, save and except supervisors, persons above the rank of supervisor, office, sales and clerical staff and those employees covered by a subsisting Collective Agreement,
constitute a unit of employees of the responding party appropriate for collective bargaining.
4. It appears to the Board on an examination of only the information provided in the application and the information and membership evidence filed by the applicant (see section 8(3) of the Act), that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the bargaining unit proposed in the application for certification were members of the union at the time the application was made.
5. Having regard to the agreement of the parties as to the appropriate bargaining unit, the Board directs that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the following voting constituency:
all part-time employees of N. Tepperman’s Ltd. in the City of Windsor, save and except supervisors, persons above the rank of supervisor, office, sales and clerical staff and those employees covered by a subsisting Collective Agreement.
6. The vote will be held on January 14, 2000. Other vote arrangements will be as directed by the Registrar and set out on the attached Notice of Vote and of Hearing.
7. All individuals who had an employment relationship with the responding party in the voting constituency on January 7, 2000, the certification application filing date, are eligible to vote. Employees having an employment relationship on January 7, 2000, the certification application filing date, include employees who were not at work on that date, so long as there is a reasonable expectation of their return to employment.
8. Voters will be asked to indicate whether or not they wish to be represented by the applicant in their employment relations with the responding party.
9. The responding party is directed to post copies of this decision and of the "Notice of Vote and of Hearing" adjacent to the "Notice to Employees of Application for Certification". These copies must remain posted for 30 days.
10. Any party or person who wishes to make representations to the Board about any issue remaining in dispute which relates to the application for certification, other than status disputes, must file a detailed statement of representations with the Board and deliver it to the other parties, so that it is received by the Board within five days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays on which the Board is closed) of the date on which the vote is taken. Representations with respect to any status dispute must be made in accordance with the directions provided in Information Bulletin No. 4: Status Disputes in Certification Applications (Non-Construction).
11. The matter is referred to the Registrar.
“Russell Goodfellow”
for the Board