3229-99-R Bill Doekes, Applicant v. United Steelworkers of America, Responding Party v. Alcast Technologies Ltd., Intervenor.
BEFORE: Russell Goodfellow, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members J. A. Rundle and
D. A. Patterson.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; February 7, 2000
The applicant has applied to the Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit for which it is the bargaining agent.
This application was filed on February 2, 2000. The employees who are affected by this application are covered by a collective agreement between the responding party and Alcast Technologies Ltd., with an effective date of March 30, 1999, until March 31, 2000. The bargaining unit description in that collective agreement is as follows:
all employees of Alcast Technologies Ltd. in the Regional Municipality of Hamilton Wentworth, save and except supervisors, persons above the rank of supervisor, office, sales and clerical staff, and students employed during the school vacation period and persons regularly employed for not more than twenty four hours per week.
Having regard to the provisions of section 63(2) of the Act, the Board finds that this application is timely.
It appears to the Board on an examination of the evidence before it, that not less than forty per cent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union at the time the application was filed.
The Board directs that a representation vote be taken of the employees of Alcast Technologies Ltd. employed in the bargaining unit described in paragraph 2 above. All those employed in that bargaining unit on February 2, 2000, the application filing date, will be eligible to vote.
The vote will be held on February 9, 2000. Other vote arrangements will be as determined by the Registrar and set out on the attached Notice of Vote and of Hearing.
Voters will be asked to indicate whether or not they wish to be represented by the responding party in their employment relations with Alcast Technologies Ltd..
The employer is directed to post copies of this decision and of the "Notice of Vote and of Hearing" adjacent to all copies of the "Notice to Employees of Application for Termination of Bargaining Rights" posted previously. These copies must remain posted for 30 days.
Any party or person who wishes to make representations to the Board about any issue remaining in dispute which relates to the application for termination of bargaining rights, other than status disputes, must file a detailed statement of representations with the Board and deliver it to the other parties, so that it is received by the Board within five days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays on which the Board is closed) of the date on which the vote is taken. Representations with respect to any status dispute must be made in accordance with the directions provided in Information Bulletin No. 5: Status Disputes in Termination Applications (Non-Construction).
The matter is referred to the Registrar.
“Russsell Goodfellow”
for the Board