2239-99-U Marie L. Murchison, Applicant v. Ontario Nurses’ Association, Responding Party v. Hotel-Dieu Grace Hospital, Intervenor.
BEFORE: David A. McKee, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; October 27, 2000
[1]. The responding party has asked the Board to explain whether or not I am seized of this application. In a decision dated March 14, 2000 I issued a decision dealing with the request by ONA to dismiss the application on a prima facie basis. I found I was not able to do so as certain information was not contained in the application and directed the applicant (following delivery of certain materials from ONA) to provide the Board with particulars of certain factual issues. I remained seized of the application as these particulars were required to complete the analysis I had started in reviewing the file.
[2]. The applicant did provide the particulars required of her. I considered that the application could not be dismissed on a prima facie basis and set the matter down for hearing. There was no need to retain jurisdiction over the application as I was not in the middle of any process.
[3]. I remain not seized of this application. The Registrar is directed to schedule the matter for hearing in whatever manner he deems appropriate.
“David A. McKee”
for the Board