0048-00-U; 1074-00-U Hotel & Restaurant Employee CAW Local 448 National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers’ Union of Canada (CAW-Canada, Applicant v. The Millcroft Inn Limited, Responding Party.
BEFORE: Christopher J. Albertyn, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; October 2, 2000
1These applications concern an unfair labour practice complaint alleging a violation of section 70 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, S.O. 1995, c.1 (“the Act”) and a request for a consent to prosecute.
2A decision was issued on August 25, 2000. The unfair labour practice application was granted; the consent to prosecute application was denied.
3The responding party has brought to the Board’s attention an aspect of the decision which requires clarification. The decision, as written, creates the impression that the employer not only refused to give the addresses and telephone numbers of its employees to the union, but also their names. That is not the case. The employer provided, on a monthly basis, a list of the names of employees to the union. That list accompanied the dues payments made each month by the employees to the union. The employer’s refusal was in respect of the addresses and telephone numbers of the employees.
4The Board was aware of this distinction at the time the decision was made, and the decision ought to have reflected it better than it did. Other than to make this point, the original decision stands.
“Christopher J. Albertyn”
for the Board