Doug Lilly v. CUPE Local 3252 Credit Valley Hospital
1942-98-U Doug Lilly, Applicant v. CUPE Local 3252 Credit Valley Hospital, Responding Party.
BEFORE: Anthony Brown, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; January 19, 2000
1This is an application pursuant to section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the "Act") alleging violation of several sections of the Act.
2The matter was scheduled for a consultation before the Board on January 6, 2000. The consultation was cancelled because the responding party, Credit Valley Hospital, advised the Board that the applicant had signed minutes of settlement on November 29, 1999, in which he agreed to withdraw his termination grievance and “any other action” to which the Credit Valley Hospital is a party.
3On January 10, 2000, the Board issued an endorsement advising the applicant that the matter would be deemed withdrawn unless the applicant provided the Board with sufficient reason for not doing so, by no later than January 17, 2000.
4In his response, filed on January 14, 2000, the applicant does not resile from the settlement and, although he expresses some regret about having signed it, he states: “I suppose, though, I will have to live with that decision even though it was totally against my better judgement.” It appears to the Board that the present application is covered by the terms of the settlement and the applicant has agreed to withdraw it.
5This application is withdrawn with leave of the Board.
“Anthony Brown”
for the Board