Ontario Labour Relations Board
1530-00-U National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada), Applicant v. SEIU Local 220, Responding Party.
BEFORE: Anthony Brown, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; September 1, 2000
1This is an application pursuant to section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the "Act") alleging unfair labour practices under various sections of the Act.
2It appears that the applicant has now served the Appendices that were apparently not originally served with the body of the application. It also appears that the responding party and all of the affected parties will receive the Appendices by September 5, 2000, at the latest.
3The Board hereby extends the time for filing a response or intervention to September 19, 2000.
4The applicant objects to an extension of time being granted to the responding party, which it alleges is well aware of the pressing matters that form the basis of this application. In the circumstances, however, the Board considers that there will be no serious prejudice to the applicant if the responding party is provided with the same period of time to respond as that given to the affected parties.
5By letter to the Board dated August 30, 2000, the applicant indicated that it “no longer seeks any remedy or order of any kind as against the following employers in the course of this proceeding:
Chelsey Park Retirement Community (Nursing Home)
Country Terrace Nursing Home
Craigholme Nursing Home
Delhi Nursing Home
Grand River Hospital Corporation
Maple Manor Nursing Home
Middlesex Terrace
Mount Hope Centre for Long Term Care
Oxford Regional Nursing Home
St. Mary’s Hospital”
6It would appear that the applicant no longer considers these organizations to be “affected parties”. Accordingly, their names are hereby deleted from the style of cause as affected parties.
7The matter is referred to the Registrar.
8I am not seized.
“Anthony Brown”
for the Board